Group Training Sessions

Most meetings don’t fail in the room. They fail before they start… and after they end. A meeting is not a 60-minute calendar block. It’s a process with 3 stages: Before. During. After. If you fix these, meetings become productive instead of performative. 1. Start with a written purpose (Before) If the meeting objective cannot be written in one clear sentence, cancel it. Bad: “Let’s discuss the project.” Good: “By the end, we will decide X and assign ownership for Y.” No purpose = no meeting. 2. Invite only owners, not spectators (Before) Meetings are not webinars. If someone is not: Deciding Contributing critical input Owning an action They don’t need to be there. Fewer people = faster decisions. 3. Share material in advance (Before) Meetings are for discussion and decisions, not silent reading. If people are seeing slides for the first time in the meeting, you’ve already lost half the time. Send pre-reads. Expect people to come prepared. 4. Run the meeting like a decision factory (During) Every agenda item must end in one of three outcomes: Decision made Action assigned (with owner + deadline) Explicitly parked If conversation is interesting but going nowhere, park it. Meetings are not thinking-out-loud therapy sessions. 5. Close the loop fast (After) The real work starts when the meeting ends. Within 24 hours, share: Decisions taken Actions, owners, deadlines What was parked If follow-ups are not tracked, meetings are just expensive conversations. A good meeting starts before the meeting and ends long after it. Preparation creates clarity. Follow-up creates results. Everything in between is just facilitation. Are you running or ruining your meetings? Which one of these tips makes most sense to you? ++++ I try to share practical, direct, no “cute crap" work/career tips. Follow me at Anshuman Tiwari and press the bell icon twice on my profile to get notifications when I post.

As the new year gets underway, I’m reflecting on my goals—and one that stands out is making my meetings more efficient. I know I’m not alone in this challenge! As a technology leader overseeing Chase’s mission-critical data systems, my calendar fills up quickly. Here are a few strategies I’m focusing on to drive meeting efficiency in 2026: 1. Who’s Invited? I’m being more intentional about attendees. Before sending an invitation, I ask myself and my managers: Does everyone here need to be involved? Is the core group represented, or has it expanded over time to include outliers? I find it helpful to scrutinize those who aren’t typically part of the conversation, as they can identify gaps in other communication channels, team workflows or individual roles. 2. Is It the Right Forum? Not every topic needs a meeting. Can the issue be addressed through a quick message, shared document or asynchronous update? Meetings should be reserved for discussions that truly benefit from real-time collaboration. 3. Redefine Goals for Recurring Meetings To prevent recurring meetings from becoming routine, I’m taking the time to revisit the purpose and goals with my team leaders—are they still relevant? It’s amazing how quickly objectives get clarified when you go back to the basics, especially as priorities shift. This exercise has a unifying effect on teams who are now aligned under one banner to make meetings more focused and productive. 4. Can Anything Be Automated? I’m always driving for opportunities to automate routine updates and status reports. By leveraging technology to handle repetitive tasks, it frees up time for more meaningful conversations and decision-making. As a leader, I know my role isn’t to solve every problem myself, but to empower the right teams and individuals to do so. By making my meetings more purposeful and efficient, I hope to create more space for innovation, collaboration and growth. What are your strategies for making meetings work better for you and your teams? Let’s make 2026 the year of smarter collaboration!

For over 20 years, I’ve coached Fortune 500 CEOs. Along the way, I’ve sat in thousands of meetings, boardrooms, off-sites, and virtual calls that should have been emails. Here’s what I’ve learned: most meetings fail before they even start. Not because people aren’t smart or the agenda is wrong. Because the collaboration happens in the wrong place. Here are four shifts that will transform how your team meets. 1. Move the debate before the meeting. The best teams don’t show up to learn and debate for the first time. They show up having already been briefed and weighed in asynchronously, in shared documents, with real thinking on the table. The meeting becomes a decision room. 2. Shrink the room. Not everyone needs to be there. If someone’s contribution is already captured in the pre-work, free them. Smaller rooms move faster. They also talk more honestly. 3. Assign dissent. Consensus is comfortable, but it’s also dangerous. The highest-performing teams I’ve coached assign the team to provide challenges. Not to be difficult, but to make the final decision stronger. 4. End with commitments, not summaries. Most meetings end with a recap of what was said. That’s useless. End with who owns what and by when. Clarity beats closure. If you do these four things, your meetings won’t just feel better. They’ll actually produce results.

Ok, raise your hand if you've ever been the "fuzzy meeting person." 🙋♀️ 🙋♀️ 🙋♀️ I’d schedule sessions with no clear agenda, no defined outcome, basically, “let's chat and figure it out.” I’d leave half-exhausted, half-confused, thinking: "Did anything just get decided? Who’s doing what? Could this have been an email?" Probably everyone else thought that too. Waste of time. It took me a while, but I realized: the problem wasn’t the team. It was me. My meetings lacked clarity + intent. So I decided to get scientific about it. I started analyzing my meeting transcriptions with CoPilot. I wanted to see: - How much time I spent talking vs listening - How often I stated an explicit decision - Where confusion or rambling crept in The results were… eye-opening. I wasn’t just scheduling fuzzy meetings, I was enabling them. Here’s the system I built to fix it: Step 1. Define the single purpose (SO IMPORTANT) Every meeting needs a north star: “By the end, what should people know, decide, or do?” Step 2. Structure the agenda around outcomes List topics → assign a single desired outcome + time limit. Step 3. Prep key points, lead with decisions Skip long-winded context. Deliver the decision first, context second. Step 4. Track your talk ratio Use AI to see if you’re dominating or clarifying. Adjust accordingly. Step 5. End with explicit next steps Who does what, by when. No assumptions. Step 6. Follow up in writing 1–2 bullets summarizing decisions + assigned owners (you can do this with AI). Send within 24 hours. I also send transcripts if necessary. The transformation? Meetings went from draining and fuzzy → purposeful, productive, and trust-building. My coworkers leave knowing exactly what to do, and I finally stopped wondering why work wasn’t getting done. People like me more (hopefully?). Also, generally reduced my meeting frequency by 20ish%. Effectiveness frees us time, who knew. Moral: meetings are time, money, and trust. If people feel like you schedule fuzzy meetings, they'll be less committed. Use those steps to focus more on your clarity and intent. How do you make meetings more effective?

Ever notice how some leaders seem to have a sixth sense for meeting dynamics while others plow through their agenda oblivious to glazed eyes, side conversations, or everyone needing several "bio breaks" over the course of an hour? Research tells us executives consider 67% of virtual meetings failures, and a staggering 92% of employees admit to multitasking during meetings. After facilitating hundreds of in-person, virtual, and hybrid sessions, I've developed my "6 E's Framework" to transform the abstract concept of "reading the room" into concrete skills anyone can master. (This is exactly what I teach leaders and teams who want to dramatically improve their meeting and presentation effectiveness.) Here's what to look for and what to do: 1. Eye Contact: Notice where people are looking (or not looking). Are they making eye contact with you or staring at their devices? Position yourself strategically, be inclusive with your gaze, and respectfully acknowledge what you observe: "I notice several people checking watches, so I'll pick up the pace." 2. Energy: Feel the vibe - is it friendly, tense, distracted? Conduct quick energy check-ins ("On a scale of 1-10, what's your energy right now?"), pivot to more engaging topics when needed, and don't hesitate to amplify your own energy through voice modulation and expressive gestures. 3. Expectations: Regularly check if you're delivering what people expected. Start with clear objectives, check in throughout ("Am I addressing what you hoped we'd cover?"), and make progress visible by acknowledging completed agenda items. 4. Extraneous Activities: What are people doing besides paying attention? Get curious about side conversations without defensiveness: "I see some of you discussing something - I'd love to address those thoughts." Break up presentations with interactive elements like polls or small group discussions. 5. Explicit Feedback: Listen when someone directly tells you "we're confused" or "this is exactly what we needed." Remember, one vocal participant often represents others' unspoken feelings. Thank people for honest feedback and actively solicit input from quieter participants. 6. Engagement: Monitor who's participating and how. Create varied opportunities for people to engage with you, the content, and each other. Proactively invite (but don't force) participation from those less likely to speak up. I've shared my complete framework in the article in the comments below. In my coaching and workshops with executives and teams worldwide, I've seen these skills transform even the most dysfunctional meeting cultures -- and I'd be thrilled to help your company's speakers and meeting leaders, too. What meeting dynamics challenge do you find most difficult to navigate? I'd love to hear your experiences in the comments! #presentationskills #virualmeetings #engagement

I’ve been thinking a lot about the 90 minute virtual meeting paradox. We spend the first 30 minutes on welcoming everyone and introductions, the next 15 on framing, and then a few people share thoughts. Then, just when the conversation gets meaningful, the host abruptly announces "We're out of time!” and throws a few rushed closing thoughts and announcements together. Sound familiar? We crave deep, meaningful, trust-based exchanges in virtual meeting environments that feel both tiring and rushed. It seems like as soon as momentum builds and insights emerge, it’s time to wrap up. Share-outs become a regurgitation of top-level ideas—usually focused on the most soundbite-ready insights and omitting those seeds of ideas that didn’t have time to be explored further. And sometimes, we even cite these meetings as examples of participation in a process, even when that participation is only surface level to check the participation box.  After facilitating and attending hundreds (thousands?) of virtual meetings, I've found four practices that create space for more engagement and depth: 1. Send a thoughtful and focused pre-work prompt at least a few days ahead of time that invites reflection before gathering. When participants arrive having already engaged with the core question(s), it’s much easier to jump right into conversation. Consider who designs these prompts and whose perspectives they center. 2. Replace round-robin introductions with a focused check-in question that directly connects to the meeting's purpose. "What's one tension you're navigating in this work?" for example yields more insight than sharing organizational affiliations. Be mindful of who speaks first and how difference cultural communication styles may influence participation.  3. Structure the agenda with intentionally expanding time blocks—start tight (and facilitate accordingly), and then create more spaciousness as the meeting progresses. This honors the natural rhythm of how trust and dialogue develop, and allows for varying approaches to processing and sharing.  4. Prioritize accessibility and inclusion in every aspect of the meeting. Anticipating and designing for participants needs means you’re thinking about language justice, technology and materials accessibility, neurodivergence, power dynamics, and content framing. Asking “What do you need to fully participate in this meeting?” ahead of time invites participants to share their needs. These meeting suggestions aren’t just about efficiency—they’re about creating spaces where authentic relationships and useful conversations can actually develop. Especially at times when people are exhausted and working hard to manage their own energy, a well-designed meeting can be a welcome space to engage. I’m curious to hear from others: What's your most effective strategy for holding substantive meetings in time-constrained virtual spaces? What meeting structures have you seen that actually work?

How I Lead Effective Meetings as a Program Manager at Amazon. Meetings can either be a powerful tool for decision-making or a frustrating time sink. Early in my career, I struggled with unstructured meetings—great discussions but no clear outcomes. One chaotic project, where we held frequent but ineffective syncs, taught me that meetings aren’t just for talking; they should drive action. Here’s how I lead meetings now: 1️⃣ Set a Clear Agenda (and Share It in Advance) Every meeting starts with a structured agenda that includes: ✔️ Objective: What we need to achieve ✔️ Discussion topics: Prioritized for focus ✔️ Attendees: Only those necessary 📌 If an agenda isn’t clear, I challenge whether the meeting is even needed. 2️⃣ Keep Meetings Decision-Oriented Before starting, I clarify: ✔️ What decisions need to be made? ✔️ Who is responsible for next steps? If discussions drift, I refocus: “This is important but let’s table it for a separate deep dive.” This keeps meetings productive instead of open-ended. 3️⃣ Ensure Follow-Through with Clear Recaps A great meeting means nothing if action items aren’t tracked. After the meeting, I send a quick recap with: ✔️ Decisions made ✔️ Action items + owners ✔️ Next steps 📌 I also log action items in a shared tracker to ensure accountability. Bonus: Reduce Unnecessary Meetings Before scheduling, I ask: Can this be solved via Slack, email, or a written update? At Amazon, concise narratives often replace meetings—allowing for more deep work. Final Thoughts A well-run meeting aligns teams, drives decisions, and prevents wasted time. The best compliment I get? “That was one of the most productive meetings I’ve been in.” How do you keep your meetings effective? #Meetings #Productivity #Leadership #ProgramManagement #Amazon

𝐌𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬: 𝐓𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐚 𝐍𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐄𝐯𝐢𝐥 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐂𝐚𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐲𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐈𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 For many startup leaders, especially introverts, meetings can feel like one of the worst parts of the role (and a good reason they left corporate life). However, well-designed and skillfully facilitated meetings encourage brainstorming, spark insights, and foster innovation. Here's how to set expectations: 𝗕𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 “𝑌𝑜𝑢 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.” — Bill Gates · Define a clear purpose: what exactly will get done in your time together? · Share materials and the agenda at least one day before. · Make everyone contribute, either by submitting questions and ideas before, offering ideas during the meeting, or sharing recommendations afterward. · If you're an introvert, plan time before/after meetings to recharge. 𝗗𝘂𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 “𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒’𝑠 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑘𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ℎ𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑎𝑠.” — Susan Cain · Set clear expectations: collaboration, contribution, and conciseness. · Ensure everyone participates with questions, thoughts, or ideas. · For recurring meetings, consider having a different team member each time share a success story or a challenge. · Assign someone to manage time (this is a tough job, so support them). · Keep comments under 60 seconds so everyone has a chance to speak. · Consider appointing a devil's advocate to challenge any unchallenged ideas. · Close by reviewing objectives and establishing next steps, with each action item assigned to a single owner. Set specific deadlines for progress updates. · If you're an introvert, explain that your quietness is for thinking, not because you are judging. However, aim to speak up at least once in each meeting. 𝗔𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 “𝑌𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑗𝑜𝑏 𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑏𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑑 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔, 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔.” – David M. Cote · Recognize publicly all participants who made meaningful contributions. · Assess if everyone contributed and gained value. If not, decide whether they should participate more actively next time or be excluded. · Seek feedback on effectiveness through quick surveys or direct questions, such as "What's one way our time could have been better used?" · Send notes and call out immediate action items. The main value of meetings lies in the follow-through afterward. · If you're an introvert, you can offer to send ideas or clarifications after the meeting, since writing may be more your style. Success depends on valuing everyone's time, with the dual objectives of business growth and personal respect. #leaders #founder #adapt #startups

“Let’s have a meeting to talk about meetings,” said no one ever. But maybe we should. A Microsoft global survey found the #1 workplace distraction is inefficient meetings. The #2? Too many of them. Sound familiar? Last week, I led a meeting effectiveness workshop for a team of 15 at the request of their practice leader—who happens to be my husband. His team’s meeting struggles? Rambling discussions, uneven engagement, unclear outcomes, and lack of follow-through. He thought a meeting AI tool might fix it. Nope. AI can help document meetings, but it can’t make people prepare better, participate more, or drive decisions. The fix? It’s not “Have an agenda”. It’s setting the right meeting norms. My husband was hesitant to put me in the late morning slot–worried the team would tune out before lunch. I told him, “Put me in, coach. I’ll show you engagement.” And I did. For 90 minutes, we tackled meeting norms head-on through interactive discussions and small group exercises. Here are 5 norms they worked through to transform their meetings: 1️⃣ 𝗦𝗲𝘁 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗮 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴. An agenda is a list of topics. A purpose answers: What critical decision needs to be made? What problem are we solving? Why does this require a discussion? If you can’t summarize the purpose in one sentence with an action verb, you don’t need a meeting. 2️⃣ 𝗕𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘄𝗵𝗼’𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗼𝗼𝗺. Some discussions only need two people; others require a small group or the full team. Match the participants and group size to the topic and purpose.  3️⃣ 𝗗𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲. Before the meeting, define the problem or goal. Identify potential solutions. Recommend one. Outline your criteria for selecting the solution(s). Back it up with data or other relevant information. Preparation = productivity. 4️⃣ 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗮 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗰𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻. A good facilitator keeps conversations on track, reins in tangents, and ensures all voices –not just the loudest–are heard. Facilitation matters more than the agenda. 5️⃣ 𝗘𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀. Summarize decisions. Assign action items. Set deadlines. Follow-up to ensure accountability and progress. A meeting without follow-through is just wasted time. The outcome of the workshop? 100% engagement. (One person even admitted she normally tunes out in these things but stayed engaged the entire time!) More importantly, the team aligned on meeting norms and left with actionable steps to improve. Want better meetings? Set better norms. Focus on facilitation. What’s one meeting tip that’s worked well for your team?

How to make your meetings 100x better: • Before each meeting, decide on the desired outcome. What needs to be happen by the end of this call? • The organizer should share an agenda at least 24h prior. Each item should have a clear purpose: – To discuss – To decide – To inform – To align • One person should always drive the meeting and be responsible for keeping everyone on time, on topic, and accountable. • If something can be achieved asynchronously (email, Loom, Google Docs), cancel the meeting, always. • Limit the number of participants in the meeting. If it's not clear whether someone should attend, leave them off and send them the Granola notes after. • Avoid recurring or standing meetings. Most of the time, "fake" work is created to fill time for the purpose of looking productive. • Default to 25-minute meetings. It instills focus and gives everyone a breather before the next one. • Disagreement is the most valuable thing that can happen in a meeting. When everyone agrees, no value is created. Instead, the person driving the meeting should nurture productive debate if it comes up. • Start the meeting by sharing data and insights, not anecdotes. This gives everyone a common starting point from which they can form their point of view. • Practice radical transparency by recording, transcribing, and documenting everything to be sent out over (easier than ever now!) • End every meeting with clear decisions and action items. No takeaways = wasted time. These are some of the things I've learned from my time at Google, Meta, and now Fibe. I hope it helps!