Streamlining Internal Communications

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

  • View profile for Greg Coquillo
    Greg Coquillo Greg Coquillo is an Influencer

    AI Infrastructure Product Leader | Scaling GPU Clusters for Frontier Models | Microsoft Azure AI & HPC | Former AWS, Amazon | Startup Investor | Linkedin Top Voice | I build the infrastructure that allows AI to scale

    228,997 followers

    Software development is quietly undergoing its biggest shift in decades. Not because of new frameworks. Not because of faster cloud. But because agents are entering the SDLC. Traditional development follows a slow, sequential loop: requirements → design → coding → testing → reviews → deployment → monitoring → feedback. Each step depends on human handoffs, manual fixes, delayed feedback, and long iteration cycles—often stretching from weeks to months. Agentic coding changes this entirely. Instead of humans writing everything line-by-line, developers express intent. Agents understand requirements, implement features, generate tests and documentation, deploy changes, monitor production, and even propose fixes. The lifecycle compresses from weeks and months into hours or days. Here’s what actually changes: • Sequential handoffs become continuous agent-driven flows • Humans shift from coding to guiding and reviewing • Documentation is generated inline, not after delivery • Testing happens automatically alongside implementation • Incidents trigger agent-assisted remediation • Monitoring feeds directly back into learning loops • Iteration becomes constant, not episodic In the Agentic SDLC: You describe outcomes. Agents execute workflows. Humans validate critical decisions. Systems learn continuously. The result isn’t just faster delivery. It’s a fundamentally different operating model for engineering—where feedback is immediate, fixes are automated, and improvement never stops. This is how software teams move from manual development pipelines to self-improving delivery systems.

  • View profile for Daniel Anderson

    🧢 Microsoft MVP | SharePoint & Copilot Strategist | Empowering teams & orgs to work smarter with optimised processes

    22,830 followers

    Dealing with multiple document libraries in Teams? I've seen many IT professionals and team leads grapple with this, let's try and simplify things. SharePoint Views and Teams Tabs. Here's a straightforward method I've implemented with clients, with pretty good feedback and results. Here’s how it works. - Use SharePoint Views to organize documents (e.g., Approved, In Review) - Copy the URL of each view - Add a SharePoint tab in Teams, pasting the specific view link - Rename the tab (bonus: add an emoji for quick recognition) - One click, and you’re where you need to be. No endless searching. No frustration. This setup works even if your files live in different SharePoint sites! Plus, you can take it further by creating a file dashboard in SharePoint and embedding it into Teams for a seamless experience. I’ve implemented this approach with multiple clients—and the feedback has been amazing. More efficiency, less chaos. This simple adjustment can help bridge the gap between SharePoint and Teams, creating a seamless workflow. Try it out and let me know how it works for you! Question for you. What's your biggest challenge with file management in Teams and SharePoint? Have you found any hacks or solutions that made a difference? Share your experiences below—your insight might just help someone turn their workflow around. 👇

  • View profile for Dr Tauseef Mehrali

    VP Regulatory | GP | “Optimistic Optimiser”

    3,512 followers

    🤯 "Quality" means something completely different to a developer, clinician, and compliance manager. And that's just one word in the complex language puzzle of healthtech. This hit home when mentoring recently and a very specific request to help develop someone's communication skills, perfectly timing with my dive into Charles Duhigg's "Supercommunicators." TL;DR: Top communicators ask 10-20x more questions than average, and achieve "neural entrainment" - their brains actually sync during conversation. Perhaps most importantly, it's about recognising and mastering three distinct conversational layers: 🔍 Problem-solving ("What's this really about?") ❤️ Emotional sharing ("How do we feel?") 🧭 Perspective exploration ("Who are we?") In healthtech we're translating between technical, product, medical, and compliance languages daily. I've found an effective approach to communication mentoring focuses on: 1️⃣ Identifying context (Is this a technical deep-dive or a compliance checkpoint?) 2️⃣ Understanding patterns (Where do messages get lost in translation?) 3️⃣ Defining success together (What does "good" look like for all parties?) 4️⃣ Staying authentic while adapting (How do we flex without losing our voice and values?) 🎯 The key with any mentoring challenge? Start with "Why and why now?" before jumping into "What and how?" What's your biggest communication challenge in digital health? How do you bridge the professional language barriers in your organisation?

  • View profile for Ruth Pearce Esq

    Breaking Lawyers Out of Burnout Culture | Speaker for Law Firms, Law Schools & Legal Organizations | Sustainable Success, Ethics & Leadership

    32,324 followers

    Communication is the glue that holds teams together, but even the smallest cracks can lead to major fractures if left unaddressed. Imagine trying to build a strong, sturdy wall without noticing the hairline cracks forming—those tiny issues eventually compromise the whole structure. The same is true for communication within teams. Here’s why communication cracks happen and how to address them before they break the team dynamic: 1️⃣ Clarity Over Assumptions One of the biggest causes of communication cracks is the assumption that everyone is on the same page. Leaders often believe their instructions are clear, while team members interpret them differently. The solution? Prioritize clarity. Spell things out, confirm understanding, ask for play backs from your audience and encourage team members to ask questions. It’s far better to over-communicate to get it wrong. 2️⃣ Build a Culture of Openness Fear of speaking up is a silent communication killer. If team members feel like they can’t ask questions, provide feedback, or share concerns, cracks start forming. Leaders must actively create an environment where openness is celebrated. Foster trust by inviting feedback regularly and responding with empathy and action. 3️⃣ Don’t Let Digital Overwhelm Human Connections In today’s workplace, we rely heavily on emails, chats, and virtual meetings. While these tools are convenient, they can dilute the human element of communication. Misinterpretations happen, and nuances are lost. Incorporate more face-to-face (or virtual face-to-face) conversations for clarity and connection. Sometimes, a 5-minute chat can fix what a dozen emails cannot. 4️⃣ Active Listening is Non-Negotiable Effective communication isn’t just about talking—it’s about listening. Leaders and team members alike need to practice active listening. This means not just hearing words but understanding intent, emotions, and the bigger picture. Active listening makes people feel valued and prevents misunderstandings from growing into bigger issues. 5️⃣ Address Conflict Early Unresolved conflict is one of the most visible cracks in team communication. When issues are ignored, they fester and grow, creating divides that are hard to repair. Address conflicts as soon as they arise. Create an environment where disagreements can be discussed constructively and lead to solutions, not resentment. Take Action Before It’s Too Late Communication cracks, if ignored, don’t just affect a single project or conversation—they compromise trust, productivity, and the overall health of the team. Proactively addressing them ensures your team remains aligned, resilient, and effective. What’s one step you’ll take this week to strengthen communication within your team? Let’s start the conversation below. 👇 #CommunicationMatters #TeamSuccess #ConflictResolution #Leadership #WorkplaceCulture #RuthOnLeadership

  • View profile for Vrinda Gupta

    2× TEDx Speaker | I help corporate teams communicate with authority | 4,500+ professionals trained across IT, FMCG, pharma, aviation | Top Voice 2025

    133,883 followers

    I’ve trained in rooms where people speak English, but think in Marathi, Hindi, Bengali, Tamil Same company, same goals, but completely different communication styles. We love patting ourselves on the back for being diverse. But when a South Indian team feels a North Indian manager is "too aggressive," or a Gen Z employee thinks their Gen X boss is "dismissive", we call it a "communication gap." When really it's India's invisible boardroom barrier. Because while communicating, you’re navigating: 🔹 Cultural nuances 🔹 Generational gaps 🔹 Language preferences 🔹 Urban vs regional perspectives And if you're not adapting, you’re alienating. Here's my 3A’s of Cross-cultural communication framework: 1. Awareness: Recognize that your communication style is shaped by region, generation, and upbringing. It's not universal. 2. Adaptation: Match your message to your audience. One style doesn't fit all rooms. 3. Ask: When in doubt, clarify: What does yes mean here? How do you prefer feedback? What's the protocol for disagreement? India's diversity is incredible. But if we are not actively learning to communicate across cultures, not just languages, we're wasting it. P.S. What's your biggest cross-cultural communication struggle? #CrossCulturalCommunication #AwarenessAdaptationAsk #3AsFramework #Awareness #Adaptation #Ask #CommunicationGaps

  • View profile for David Karp

    Customer Success + Growth Executive | Building Trusted, Scalable Post-Sales Teams | Fortune 500 Partner | AI Embracer

    32,524 followers

    💡 Every executive meeting comes down to trade-offs. Yesterday we found our tiebreaker💡 I sat with our Product team and two other members of our Executive team, going deep on one of our roadmap items and trying to determine where it fit in our Q4 priorities. If you’ve ever been in one of these meetings, you know how it goes: • Many points of view • Plenty of sharp ideas • A healthy dose of agreement and disagreement And rightly so, these conversations matter. They’re about trade-offs and risks. We had to weigh what would best help us grow as a company, what our teams needed to deliver and sell successfully, and what would best enable future product capabilities. So what won in the end? 👉 The promise we’ve made to our customers, rooted in quality and meaningful insights and outcomes. (That’s actually why DISQO is spelled with a “Q.” It stands for Quality.) That customer promise became the tiebreaker that aligned us across different perspectives. It was a small moment, but it made me proud. And it made me reflect: ❓ Of the thousands of decisions made every day across our company, how many are rooted in our value to "Champion the Customer"? That’s the real measure of whether our values are alive in practice, not just on the wall or in a slide deck. Here’s the action plan I’m challenging myself (and others) to follow every day: 1️⃣ Ask the customer question. When making a decision, pause: How does this help deliver better outcomes for our customers? 2️⃣ Use values as the tiebreaker. When trade-offs are hard, let company values decide, not convenience, politics, or ego. 3️⃣ Call it out. Celebrate when decisions reflect values, and respectfully challenge when they don’t. 4️⃣ Repeat daily. The small decisions add up. Every “yes” or “no” shapes whether customers feel our values or not. ✨ Values aren’t tested in easy decisions. They’re tested in the tough trade-offs. Yesterday reminded me: when in doubt, Champion the Customer. That’s how we keep our promises, and that’s how we continue to #CreateTheFuture. #Leadership #CustomerSuccess #ProductManagement #CustomerExperience #Culture #CreateTheFuture

  • View profile for Jesse Randall

    CEO @ Sweater | White Collar Life, Blue Collar Roots

    48,423 followers

    A ton of people have messaged me asking what system I use for sharing pitch decks. Here’s why I use Docsend and always will, despite the cons. 👉🏼 Ease of Sending👈🏼 Sharing a link is easier than sending a document. Embed in an email. Paste into a text or WhatsApp. The document can be any size. Some large institutions may not allow people to click on links, but this is a SMALL exception. 👉🏼Version Control👈🏼 You can upload new versions of your deck without changing the link. Meaning that anyone you’ve ever shared the link with will always have the most recent version of your story. Super smooth for both sides. 👉🏼Security👈🏼 There aren’t many bad actors, but there are some out there. It’s impossible to know who they are. DocSend puts up just enough resistance to stop indescriminate sharing of your deck with competitors or anyone else who shouldn’t have your deck. 👉🏼Interest Insights👈🏼 You can see how much time people are spending on your deck, and what slides capture their attention (or don’t). This is quite helpful as you refine your story, but it’s not as useful as you’d think in the long run. 👉🏼Other Considerations👈🏼 Some VCs and analysts are bugged when they see a link because they know they’re being tracked. Great analysts are fine with this because they know they’re doing their best to take a shot at understanding the business. Anyone spending 2-3 minutes on a 10-15 slide deck did it justice. Anyone who cuts through a deck in under 60 seconds doesn’t actually want to understand you, they want to check a box, and they probably have some superiority know-it-all syndrome anyway. Just my two cents. Just know that some people you encounter may silently not be happy about being tracked. Enjoy the tool. It’s cheap and worth it in my opinion. #founders #fundraising

  • View profile for Dr. Saleh ASHRM - iMBA Mini

    Ph.D. in Accounting | lecturer | TOT | Sustainability & ESG | Financial Risk & Data Analytics | Peer Reviewer @Elsevier & Virtus Interpress | LinkedIn Creator| 70×Featured LinkedIn News, Bizpreneurme ME, Daman, Al-Thawra

    10,119 followers

    How do you talk about sustainability and climate issues in your company? If you’ve ever found yourself struggling to make sustainability resonate with your team, you’re not alone. At Microsoft, for example, they’ve found that speaking the right "language" makes all the difference. Being a tech company, their conversations around sustainability are deeply rooted in a quantitative, data-driven approach after all, they’re engineers at heart. They use the same principles that drive their technology to frame sustainability risks and opportunities. But what if your company isn’t full of engineers? Every organization speaks its internal language, whether that’s the analytical mindset of finance, the creativity of marketing, or the operations-driven approach of manufacturing. Tailoring sustainability messaging to align with these unique perspectives can bridge the gap, making it easier for employees to see how it connects to what they do every day. One thing is clear across all industries though: the language of science is essential. Whether you're talking to your marketing team, engineers, or executives, scientific facts are the backbone of any meaningful conversation about sustainability. Data on carbon footprints, climate risks, and environmental impacts provide a foundation everyone can work with. According to the IPCC, we need to reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by 43% by 2030 to stay on track with climate goals numbers. Take Unilever, for example. They made sustainability a part of their company culture by translating climate goals into everyday actions for each department. Their marketing team talks about sustainable sourcing, while their R&D team focuses on lowering the carbon footprint of products. By embedding sustainability into every part of the business, Unilever is empowering all employees to contribute, leading to a 32% reduction in their environmental impact. Sustainability isn’t a one-size-fits-all conversation. But when you frame it in terms that make sense to your team, it becomes part of how your business thinks and operates every day. So, how will you start the conversation within your organization?

  • View profile for Aarushi Singh
    Aarushi Singh Aarushi Singh is an Influencer

    Product Marketer in Tech

    34,462 followers

    That’s the thing about feedback—you can’t just ask for it once and call it a day. I learned this the hard way. Early on, I’d send out surveys after product launches, thinking I was doing enough. But here’s what happened: responses trickled in, and the insights felt either outdated or too general by the time we acted on them. It hit me: feedback isn’t a one-time event—it’s an ongoing process, and that’s where feedback loops come into play. A feedback loop is a system where you consistently collect, analyze, and act on customer insights. It’s not just about gathering input but creating an ongoing dialogue that shapes your product, service, or messaging architecture in real-time. When done right, feedback loops build emotional resonance with your audience. They show customers you’re not just listening—you’re evolving based on what they need. How can you build effective feedback loops? → Embed feedback opportunities into the customer journey: Don’t wait until the end of a cycle to ask for input. Include feedback points within key moments—like after onboarding, post-purchase, or following customer support interactions. These micro-moments keep the loop alive and relevant. → Leverage multiple channels for input: People share feedback differently. Use a mix of surveys, live chat, community polls, and social media listening to capture diverse perspectives. This enriches your feedback loop with varied insights. → Automate small, actionable nudges: Implement automated follow-ups asking users to rate their experience or suggest improvements. This not only gathers real-time data but also fosters a culture of continuous improvement. But here’s the challenge—feedback loops can easily become overwhelming. When you’re swimming in data, it’s tough to decide what to act on, and there’s always the risk of analysis paralysis. Here’s how you manage it: → Define the building blocks of useful feedback: Prioritize feedback that aligns with your brand’s goals or messaging architecture. Not every suggestion needs action—focus on trends that impact customer experience or growth. → Close the loop publicly: When customers see their input being acted upon, they feel heard. Announce product improvements or service changes driven by customer feedback. It builds trust and strengthens emotional resonance. → Involve your team in the loop: Feedback isn’t just for customer support or marketing—it’s a company-wide asset. Use feedback loops to align cross-functional teams, ensuring insights flow seamlessly between product, marketing, and operations. When feedback becomes a living system, it shifts from being a reactive task to a proactive strategy. It’s not just about gathering opinions—it’s about creating a continuous conversation that shapes your brand in real-time. And as we’ve learned, that’s where real value lies—building something dynamic, adaptive, and truly connected to your audience. #storytelling #marketing #customermarketing

  • View profile for Dana DiTomaso

    I help you level up your analytics and digital marketing skills linktr.ee/danaditomaso

    17,183 followers

    Internal newsletters get a bad rap because most of them are terrible. I'm talking about those corporate updates that everyone immediately deletes. The ones that feel like someone's checking a box rather than actually trying to connect with their team. But here's the thing: when done right, internal newsletters can transform your company culture, especially for remote teams. Brittany Zerr breaks this down perfectly in her latest article about how we started The Hundy P Gazette at Kick Point Inc. two years ago, and it's genuinely become something our team looks forward to reading. The secret? Make it 80% fun and 20% important updates. Include recipe recommendations, pet photos, Taylor Swift fan theories (thanks Liz!), and yes, even silly polls. When people actually want to read your newsletter, they'll stick around for the boring but necessary stuff too. What I love most is how it humanizes everyone. These small connections make such a difference when you're all working from different screens. Brittany makes a great point about using Notion instead of fancy email templates because it keeps things casual and lets people comment directly. It feels more like a conversation than a corporate broadcast. The best advice from her article? Start small, make it easy for people to contribute, and don't overthink it. Your first edition will probably suck, but that's okay. Focus on getting your team's personality to shine through. #RemoteWork #CompanyCulture #InternalCommunication

Explore categories