You hit every KPI. But did anything actually get better? Solving the wrong problem perfectly is still failure. So is solving the right one - without knowing how you’ll measure it. Let’s say a digital health platform launches: 🔹Sleek interface 🔹User numbers climbing 🔹Dashboards full of green ticks But two months later... 🔹Patients are still confused 🔹Clinicians are frustrated 🔹Data isn’t flowing across systems 🔹Helpdesk tickets pile up The dashboard says success... but the outcomes show otherwise. In digital health, success is often defined too narrowly: 🔸The platform went live 🔸KPIs were ticked 🔸Stakeholders celebrated But if patients still struggle, providers still burn out, and workflows remain broken - was it really a success? The truth is, different players define success differently: 🔹Patients want clarity and trust 🔹Clinicians want support in context 🔹IT wants performance 🔹Leadership wants results 🔹Funders want scale And that misalignment is where failure often begins. We don’t just need SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound) goals. We need SMART goals for healthcare, ones that reflect complexity, context, and care. Because what gets measured, gets built. And if we define success in terms of speed and scale, we risk delivering fast but shallow. A better way would be to define success through multiple lenses Systems Thinking 🔸What ripple effects will this change create? 🔸Will it reinforce or undermine other parts of care delivery? Design Thinking 🔸Does this make life better for the people using it? 🔸Does it work in context, not just on paper? Interoperability Thinking 🔸Will it integrate across teams and platforms - or just add noise? How does SMART Goals for healthcare looks like? ✨S – Shared & Specific Is the goal clear and aligned across patients, providers, and implementers? ✨M – Meaningful & Measurable Does it tie to real improvement - not just activity? ✨A – Aligned & Achievable Is it grounded in actual clinical workflows and capacity? ✨R – Relevant & Responsible Is it equity-conscious, ethically sound, and system-aware? ✨T – Time-bound & Tracked Is it tracked across the care journey - with feedback loops, not just endpoints? What this looks like in action: 🔹30% reduction in medication errors across 3 facilities in 6 months 🔹15% improvement in post-discharge follow-up for elderly patients using an interoperable care platform 🔹Measurable reduction in care team workload without sacrificing continuity or quality Not: 🔸Number of logins 🔸Lines of code shipped 🔸How fast we deployed When goals are shared, meaningful, and grounded in real care, 🔸Teams stay focused 🔸Results are credible 🔸Patients feel the difference Define success. Measure what matters. That’s how we make digital health actually work. What’s one thing you believe we should start measuring - but rarely do in digital health today? #HumanCenteredDesign #SystemsThinking #Interoperability
Productivity Methods And Systems
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
Goals are static. They assume life will move in a straight line from A to B. But life is rarely linear. Priorities shift, energy changes, things break. Systems are different. A system adapts. It focuses on the small, repeatable inputs that create progress no matter what happens around you. For example, instead of chasing a goal like “get fit,” build a system of daily movement, proper rest and balanced meals. Instead of “grow the business,” create a rhythm for outreach, reviews and experiments that keep learning constant. The goal gives direction. The system builds the path. When things go wrong, goals make you feel behind. Systems keep you moving. If you’re stuck right now, stop trying to fix the goal. Start building the system that makes the goal inevitable.
-
Stop for a moment and think of the biggest problem in your business right now. This probably won’t take much as it’s likely top of mind for you anyway. What did you come up with? Not enough sales? Low profits? Bad company culture? Poor-quality leads? None of these are the actual problems. All of these are symptoms. They’re symptoms of a bad system. The problem is the system. Eating junk food for every meal is a system. It’s just not a very good one. Do this long enough, and illness will become a symptom. Only connecting with your audience when you want to promote something is also a system. Again, it's not a very good one. The symptom will be an unresponsive list, unsubscribes and spam complaints. And just as good systems compound over time, so do bad systems. While goals a great, the reality is everything you want is downstream of your systems. Just like you, over the years I’ve tried just about every goal-setting strategy out there—writing them down, visualizing them, sharing them with people to keep me accountable, blah, blah, blah. None of these worked beyond the honeymoon phase. The problem is they all mostly rely on willpower. Even if you happen to achieve them through sheer force, the gains are usually short-lived. Here’s what to do instead: Loose goals, tight systems. James Clear, the author of Atomic Habits, says, “The more disciplined your environment is, the less disciplined you need to be. Don’t swim upstream.” In my book, Lean Marketing (page 194), I define loose goals and tight systems as follows: “A loose goal sets the direction you want to go without being fixed on the final destination because there is no final destination. The goal is to keep playing the game and improving indefinitely. A tight system sets up your environment so it’s easy to keep improving.” Every time I’ve ever made serious progress on anything, whether it be writing, weight-lifting, or marketing, it has been a direct result of my tight systems. Every time I’ve stalled or gone backward, it has been because my system sucked. What systems do you need to tighten?
-
🚀 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗜𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗣𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 – 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 In a world captivated by time management hacks like Inbox Zero, the Pomodoro Technique, and the Eisenhower Matrix, it’s easy to miss a crucial reality: true productivity isn’t about individuals—it’s about systems. Even with the best hacks, organizations often struggle to manage time effectively. As legendary management consultant W. Edwards Deming noted in 'Out of the Crisis: “94% of problems stem from systems, not people.” 🔑 So, how can organizations elevate productivity at the system level? Daniel Markovitz’s January 2021 HBR article (shared herewith) offers four impactful strategies: 1️⃣ Tiered Huddles: Regular, structured meetings across all levels—from frontline teams to executives—enable faster decision-making and reduce email overload. Long email chains often breed miscommunication and procrastination. 2️⃣ Visibility: Utilize physical or virtual task boards to track workflows and downtime. Transparency not only highlights bottlenecks but also ensures equitable workload distribution, fostering better team productivity. 3️⃣ Clear Communication Protocols: Establish clear channels for signaling urgency (e.g.: Batman’s Bat Signal 🦇) to minimize unnecessary interruptions and confusion. 4️⃣ Align Responsibility with Authority: Empower employees to make decisions within their roles, eliminating bottlenecks and reducing frustration. Team productivity thrives when responsibilities are balanced with decision-making authority. 💡These strategies are more than operational tweaks—they create a culture where streamlined systems drive both efficiency and employee satisfaction. Remember, productivity isn’t a solo act - it’s a symphony orchestrated by effective systems.
-
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗳 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗴𝗼𝗮𝗹-𝘀𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘀 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴? As I thought about the goals I actually reached over the past year (I didn't hit them all), I realised most of them weren’t about hitting a specific outcome. They were grounded in regular, consistent practice — a system! Traditional goal-setting tells us that a goal needs to have an endpoint. It 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 be measurable, specific, and time-bound. But honestly? That approach can often lead to targets that feel arbitrary or disconnected from what really matters. For example, I could have said, "I want X new clients by June". But that number would’ve been plucked out of thin air and lacked meaning for me. Instead, I focused on showing up consistently, refining what I was doing, and building relationships. Here’s why I’m taking a system-focused approach to 2025 — and why it might work for you too: 1️⃣ Focus on inputs, not outputs. Instead of stressing about the result, concentrate on the actions that will get you there. For example, instead of "I want to read 20 books in 2025", try "I’ll read for 15 minutes before bed every night". Small, consistent inputs lead to big results. 2️⃣ Celebrate progress over perfection. Outcome-based goals are all-or-nothing — you either achieve them or you don’t. But with systems, you can celebrate the small wins along the way. Progress feels good, and it keeps you going. 3️⃣ Keep moving forward. What happens after you hit your goal? Often, progress stalls. But with a system, there’s no finish line. You just keep improving, one step at a time and you can adapt to new opportunities or challenges with ease. Here’s an example: 💡 Outcome-focused goal: "I want to be promoted to a Manager role by July 2025". 💡 System-focused goal: "I’ll complete one Learna topic on leadership, feedback, or coaching every Friday and put it into action during team WIPs.” The second approach builds a habit, not just a result. As James Clear said in Atomic Habits: "You do not rise to the level of your goals. You fall to the level of your systems". So, instead of setting rigid goals for 2025, think about the systems you can create to help you grow. It’s not about being perfect — it’s about showing up, staying consistent, and making progress. What systems are you thinking about for the year ahead? #GoalSetting #SystemsOverGoals #CareerDevelopment #NewYearGoals
-
People often ask: "How do you juggle so many things?" Here's the truth 👇 I'm not doing more. I'm doing it through systems. What you're seeing now ,multiple projects launching, speaking engagements across continents, courses going live, content flowing didn't start this month. These seeds were planted years ago. 🌱 They're simply maturing at the same time. This isn't luck. It's intentional design. Over years of trial and refinement, I've distilled my approach into a framework I call MATURE™ 🔵 M — Map roles into projects with clear outcomes 🟣 A — Anchor key habits to specific cues 🔴 T — Time-block for deep work and protect it fiercely 🟠 U — Use templates and automation 🟢 R — Review weekly with a small wins log 🔵 E — Enlist vertical and horizontal support The science backs this up: 🧠 Implementation intentions significantly boost goal attainment ; difficult goals completed up to 3x more often ⚡ 43% of daily behaviour is automatic and context-driven ; design your environment, not your willpower 🎯 Task-switching costs up to 40% of productive time , protect your focus like you protect your calendar 📈 Progress in meaningful work is the single most powerful day-to-day motivator , track your small wins And perhaps most importantly: No one succeeds alone. ⬆️ Vertical support — mentors, accountability, strategic guidance ➡️ Horizontal support — peers, teams, family I rely on both. Every single day. Here's what I've learned after years of managing multiple missions: ❌ Performance without a system is fragile ✅ Performance with a system is repeatable If you're juggling multiple roles and feeling stretched , you don't need more motivation. You don't need another productivity hack. You need a system that matures with you. In my latest Thrive by Design™ newsletter, I break down: ✔️ The full MATURE™ framework ✔️ The science behind each principle ✔️ Reflection questions for each step ✔️ A 7-day implementation plan 💬 What systems help YOU manage competing priorities without burning out? I'd love to learn from you. ♻️ If this resonates, share it with someone who's juggling multiple roles. We rise by lifting others. #ThriveByDesign #LifestyleMedicine #SystemsThinking #Leadership #BurnoutPrevention #Productivity #MATURE #TimeManagement #HighPerformance #DoctorWellbeing
-
Successful people don’t rise on ambition alone. They rise on #structure. A #goal gives you direction. It tells you where you want to go. But a #system decides whether you actually get there. I was reflecting on this through a simple visual: One path climbs in steps—steady, repeatable, almost predictable. The other leans on a single steep rise—impressive at first glance, but hard to sustain. That contrast says everything about how progress really works. When we chase goals alone: • We depend on motivation, which comes and goes • We celebrate the finish line, then feel a strange emptiness • We start strong, but struggle to stay consistent It becomes a cycle—start, push, pause, restart. But when we build systems: • We show up daily, regardless of mood • We reduce friction in doing the right things • We make progress part of routine, not effort • We continue even on days when motivation is missing And over time, something subtle but powerful happens. Effort turns into rhythm. Rhythm turns into momentum. Momentum turns into outcomes. In leadership, this distinction matters even more. Teams that are driven only by targets often swing between highs and lows. Teams that operate on clear systems—cadence, feedback loops, shared habits—deliver with stability. The same applies to personal growth. Fitness is not built in bursts of inspiration. Learning is not built in last-minute sprints. Relationships are not built in occasional gestures. They are built in small, repeated actions. There is also a deeper truth here. Goals are finite. Systems are continuous. Once a goal is achieved, the mind asks, “What next?” But a system never asks that question. It simply continues to move forward. That is why some people sustain excellence for decades, while others peak briefly. It is not about intensity. It is about consistency. So the real question is not: “What is your next goal?” It is: “What is the system you trust enough to follow every day?” Because in the end, goals may give you a moment of success. But systems shape who you become. And that is a far more enduring outcome. DC*
-
High achievers don't need more motivation... They need better systems: Motivation is a mood. Systems are infrastructure. A well-built system works whether you feel like it or not. It gives you a repeatable way of doing the boring parts - And saves your energy for the work that actually matters. Here are 12 you can install today: 1. Batch Tasks ↳Handle email, admin, and messages in fixed blocks ↳Action: Pick two daily slots (AM + PM) and close inboxes the rest of the day 2. Two-Minute Rule ↳Tiny tasks create momentum if handled right away ↳Action: When a quick task pops up today, finish it instantly 3. Time-Block ↳Put deep work on the calendar first ↳Action: Reserve your peak 2-hour window tomorrow for one priority project 4. Build Templates ↳Outlines for agendas, reports, and replies save time and energy ↳Action: Create one template today for a task you repeat weekly 5. Automate Resets ↳Weekly and daily checkpoints prevent drift ↳Action: Block 30 minutes Friday for review + 5 minutes each morning to plan 6. Daily Shutdown ↳A shutdown routine marks work as "done" ↳Action: Write tomorrow's top 3 tasks, then close your laptop and leave the workspace 7. Environment Design ↳Make bad habits harder, good ones easier ↳Action: Put your phone in another room at night and set out what you need for the morning 8. Single-Tasking ↳Focus beats juggling ↳Action: Close extra tabs and set a 25-minute timer for one task only 9. Parking Lot ↳Capture stray ideas and tasks so your brain can stay clear ↳Action: Open a "Parking Lot" note on your phone and drop distractions there 10. Finish Lines ↳Define "done" to stop endless tweaking ↳Action: For your next task, write down what 'good enough' looks like before starting 11. Pre-Decide ↳Fewer daily choices = more bandwidth ↳Action: Decide tonight what you'll eat and when you'll exercise tomorrow 12. Daily Cleanup ↳Tiny resets keep clutter from building up ↳Action: End each day with 5 minutes clearing desk, files, and notes Which of these would make the biggest difference for you this week? --- ♻️ Share this to inspire others to build systems. And follow me George Stern for more.
-
Soil Testing and Monitoring: Key to Healthy Soils and Sustainable Agriculture 🔬🌱 Soil testing and monitoring are essential practices for ensuring soil health, optimizing crop production, and promoting sustainable land use. By understanding the characteristics and conditions of soil, farmers and land managers can make informed decisions that enhance soil fertility and minimize environmental impacts. In this post, we’ll explore the importance of soil testing, key parameters to assess, and best practices for effective soil monitoring. What is Soil Testing❓ Soil testing involves collecting soil samples and analyzing them in a laboratory to determine various properties, including nutrient levels, pH, organic matter content, and texture. This information helps land managers understand the nutrient status of their soils and make necessary amendments to support crop growth. Importance of Soil Testing and Monitoring 1. Nutrient Management: Soil testing provides valuable data about nutrient availability, allowing for precise fertilizer applications that match crop needs and reduce excess inputs. 2. Soil Health Assessment: Regular monitoring can reveal changes in soil health over time, helping to identify potential issues such as nutrient depletion, compaction, or erosion. 3. Cost Efficiency: By tailoring inputs based on soil tests, farmers can avoid over-fertilization and save on costs associated with unnecessary chemical applications. 4. Environmental Protection: Accurate soil management reduces nutrient runoff into waterways, minimizing the risk of pollution and helping to maintain local ecosystems. 5. Improved Crop Yields: Understanding soil nutrient dynamics enables farmers to optimize crop production and improve overall yields. Key Parameters to Assess in Soil Testing 1. pH Level: Soil pH affects nutrient availability and microbial activity. Most crops thrive in a pH range of 6.0 to 7.5. 2. Nutrient Levels: Assess macronutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium) and micronutrients (iron, magnesium, zinc) to understand what is available for plant uptake. 3. Organic Matter Content: Measuring organic matter helps gauge soil fertility and health, as it is essential for nutrient retention and microbial activity. 4. Soil Texture: Understanding the proportions of sand, silt, and clay in the soil influences water retention, drainage, and nutrient availability. 5. Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC): CEC indicates the soil's ability to hold and exchange nutrients, providing insight into soil fertility. Conclusion Soil testing and monitoring play a crucial role in sustainable agriculture by providing vital information on soil health and fertility. By implementing regular soil assessments, farmers can make informed decisions that enhance crop production, protect the environment, and promote long-term soil sustainability. Investing in good soil management practices today ensures healthier soils for future generations.
-
SPC – The Language of Process Stability We often hear: “The machine is running fine.” But how do we prove it? That’s where SPC (Statistical Process Control) steps in. SPC uses data + statistics to check whether a process is: Stable (predictable, under control) Capable (meeting customer requirements) Step 1: Define the Specification Suppose we are making a motorcycle frame tube joint. Required specification = Diameter = 50.00 mm ± 0.20 mm That means: LSL (Lower Spec Limit) = 49.80 mm USL (Upper Spec Limit) = 50.20 mm --- Step 2: Collect Data from Production We take 5 samples every shift. Example readings: 50.05, 50.02, 49.98, 50.07, 50.01 --- Step 3: Calculate the Average (X̄) and Range (R) Average (X̄) = (50.05 + 50.02 + 49.98 + 50.07 + 50.01) ÷ 5 = 250.13 ÷ 5 = 50.026 mm Range (R) = Highest – Lowest = 50.07 – 49.98 = 0.09 mm This tells us the process is not fluctuating wildly. --- Step 4: Estimate Variation (σ) For simplicity, assume σ = R ÷ d2 (where d2 is a statistical factor). For sample size 5, d2 = 2.326. σ = 0.09 ÷ 2.326 ≈ 0.039 mm --- Step 5: Check Process Capability (Cp & Cpk) 1. Cp (Potential Capability): Formula = (USL – LSL) ÷ (6σ) = (50.20 – 49.80) ÷ (6 × 0.039) = 0.40 ÷ 0.234 = 1.71 Means the process has the potential to meet specs. --- 2. Cpk (Actual Capability): Formula = min[(X̄ – LSL) ÷ (3σ), (USL – X̄) ÷ (3σ)] = min[(50.026 – 49.80) ÷ (0.117), (50.20 – 50.026) ÷ (0.117)] = min[(0.226 ÷ 0.117), (0.174 ÷ 0.117)] = min[1.93, 1.49] = 1.49 Means the process is well within limits, slightly shifted but safe. --- Step 6: Interpret with a Table Cp / Cpk Value Meaning < 1.00 Not capable – high risk of defects 1.00 – 1.33 Marginal – needs improvement 1.33 – 1.67 Capable – industry acceptable > 1.67 World class, highly capable --- Final Takeaway Cp = What the process could achieve Cpk = What the process is actually delivering For our motorcycle frame: Cp = 1.71 → Machine/process is excellent. Cpk = 1.49 → Process is stable, safe, and customer won’t see defects. SPC is not just math – it’s an early warning system to avoid costly rework or recalls. In short: SPC = Early warning system before customers complain. #Quality #SPC #Manufacturing #LeanSixSigma #VIPtalks
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Healthcare
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development