Testing Ecommerce Site Usability

🚨Incoming: Key Insights from CISA's FY23 Risk and Vulnerability Assessment: Strengthening Critical Infrastructure Security🚨 As America's Cyber Defense Agency, CISA's FY23 Risk and Vulnerability Assessment (RVA) report, based on over 100 RVAs, provides essential insights into the cyber threats facing federal agencies and critical infrastructure. 🔑 Key Attack Vectors: 🔹Phishing & Default Credentials: "Assessors completed their most successful attacks via common methods, such as phishing, valid accounts, and default credentials," demonstrating the ongoing risk of fundamental cyber hygiene failures. 🔹Valid Accounts: "The number of valid accounts used in privilege escalation and lateral movement increased significantly," highlighting how attackers exploit identity mismanagement to gain deeper network access. 🔹Misconfigurations: "CISA assessment personnel used common vulnerabilities facilitated by shortcomings in secure-by-design and default principles and other misconfigurations to compromise systems." 🔐 Entities should implement mitigations-centered intrusion prevention, such as: 🔹Deploying a centralized cyber threat intelligence platform to monitor and log critical data and use the platform to detect and remediate abnormal behavior promptly. 🔹Implementing a secure network security architecture with multiple layers of protection—using next-generation firewalls, granular access controls, network segmentation, SIEM/SOAR, robust encryption, and secure communication. 🔹Enhanced protection mechanisms alongside strong credential policies, such as phishing-resistant MFA, to safeguard sensitive accounts. 📊 This report, based on over 100 assessments, closely aligns with NIST SP 800-207 on Zero Trust Architecture and CISA’s Zero Trust Maturity Model. The insights emphasize the importance of identity-centric security, segmentation, and least-privilege access—vital information for any cyber defender seeking to safeguard their environment against sophisticated threats. #cybersecurity #criticalInfrastructure #zerotrust #CISA #RiskManagement

Nobody Has Solved Vulnerability Management Let's face it - vulnerability management remains unsolved—not for lack of tools or effort, but because the problem is rooted in the reality of complex, ever-evolving IT environments and misaligned priorities. The Root Cause 🚨 Prioritisation Paralysis: Security teams commonly label “everything” as a priority, leading to an unsustainable situation where real threats get lost in the noise. When all vulnerabilities are urgent, none actually are, diluting focus and overloading remediation teams. 🚨 Lack of Standardisation: Without industry-standard ratings, organisations juggle different scoring systems (CVSS, vendor scores, managerial directives), making effective risk prioritisation nearly impossible. 🚨 Silos & Communication Gaps: Security and IT operate in isolation—security wants speed, IT wants stability. This results in missed patches, rushed deployments without proper testing, and unclear accountability. 🚨 Information Blind Spots: Organisations lack full visibility into their attack surface, shadow IT, and contextual risk data. This leads to decisions made in the dark, undermining any best efforts at prioritisation. Why Current Approaches Struggle ⚠️ Overwhelming Volume: Monthly maintenance, zero-day threats, and critical app updates all compete for attention. Most teams fall back on rigid cycles, missing the nuance needed for real-world threats. ⚠️ Manual & Reactive Processes: Reliance on spreadsheets or siloed tools results in a reactive, rather than proactive, approach to patching. Best Practices for Patch Prioritisation To break the cycle, leading practice is moving toward a risk-based approach: 💡 Track-Based Remediation: Assign vulnerabilities to distinct tracks—routine, critical application, or urgent zero-days—and manage each according to risk and business impact. 💡 Continuous Contextual Analysis: Integrate vulnerability intelligence, exploit likelihood, compliance requirements, and business exposure into prioritisation—not just severity scores. 💡 Automation & AI: Use AI for fast analysis of vast data sources, applying predictive models to score risk more accurately. Automate patch testing and deployment to close gaps and improve consistency. 💡 Unified Visibility: Invest in tools that give a comprehensive, context-rich view of your organisation’s true attack surface and current exposures. The Path Forward Nobody has solved vulnerability management because the challenge isn’t just technical—it’s operational, cultural, and contextual. Until organisations bridge silos, clarify ownership, embrace risk-based prioritisation, and utilise advanced automation, vulnerability management will continue to be a juggling act.

🚨 Mastering IT Risk Assessment: A Strategic Framework for Information Security In cybersecurity, guesswork is not strategy. Effective risk management begins with a structured, evidence-based risk assessment process that connects technical threats to business impact. This framework — adapted from leading standards such as NIST SP 800-30 and ISO/IEC 27005 — breaks down how to transform raw threat data into actionable risk intelligence: 1️⃣ System Characterization – Establish clear system boundaries. Define the hardware, software, data, interfaces, people, and mission-critical functions within scope. 🔹 Output: System boundaries, criticality, and sensitivity profile. 2️⃣ Threat Identification – Identify credible threat sources — from external adversaries to insider risks and environmental hazards. 🔹 Output: Comprehensive threat statement. 3️⃣ Vulnerability Identification – Pinpoint systemic weaknesses that can be exploited by these threats. 🔹 Output: Catalog of potential vulnerabilities. 4️⃣ Control Analysis – Evaluate the design and operational effectiveness of current and planned controls. 🔹 Output: Control inventory with performance assessment. 5️⃣ Likelihood Determination – Assess the probability that a given threat will exploit a specific vulnerability, considering existing mitigations. 🔹 Output: Likelihood rating. 6️⃣ Impact Analysis – Quantify potential losses in terms of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets. 🔹 Output: Impact rating. 7️⃣ Risk Determination – Integrate likelihood and impact to determine inherent and residual risk levels. 🔹 Output: Ranked risk register. 8️⃣ Control Recommendations – Prioritize security enhancements to reduce risk to acceptable levels. 🔹 Output: Targeted control recommendations. 9️⃣ Results Documentation – Compile the process, findings, and mitigation actions in a formal risk assessment report for governance and audit traceability. 🔹 Output: Comprehensive risk assessment report. When executed properly, this process transforms IT threat data into strategic business intelligence, enabling leaders to make informed, risk-based decisions that safeguard the organization’s assets and reputation. 👉 Bottom line: An organization’s resilience isn’t built on tools — it’s built on a disciplined, repeatable approach to understanding and managing risk. #CyberSecurity #RiskManagement #GRC #InformationSecurity #ISO27001 #NIST #Infosec #RiskAssessment #Governance

From Vulnerability Management to CTEM: Why Security Must Shift from Lists to Outcomes Most vulnerability management programs are doing precisely what they were designed to do. Scan. Score. Ticket. Patch. The problem is that the environment has changed. Security teams are buried in thousands of “critical” findings while attackers exploit a very small number of real paths to impact. CVSS alone cannot tell you which vulnerability leads to customer data loss, financial fraud, or operational disruption. That gap is where breaches happen. Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) closes this gap by shifting the question from “What is vulnerable?” to “What can actually be exploited to harm the business?” The Shift Through a Practical Lens People: CTEM forces ownership. Every critical exposure has a named owner, escalation path, and risk decision. No owner means permanent exposure. Data: Prioritization becomes contextual. Threat intelligence, asset criticality, internet reachability, and compensating controls matter more than raw CVSS scores. Process: CTEM runs as a continuous cycle: scope, discover, prioritize, validate, mobilize. Security stops sending generic reports and starts delivering evidence-backed actions tied to business outcomes. Technology: Discovery expands beyond servers to identity, SaaS, cloud misconfigurations, OT, and AI systems. Validation tools prove exploitability before remediation is requested. Business: The output is reduced exposure to crown-jewel services, faster remediation of real attack paths, and defensible risk conversations at the board level. CTEM Operationalizes Leading Frameworks Scoping aligns to NIST CSF Identify and CIS Control 1, defining what matters most. Discovery maps to MITRE ATT&CK reconnaissance and CIS Control 2, revealing the complete attack surface. Prioritization leverages NIST CSF Protect and OWASP Risk Rating, focusing on exploitable paths to critical assets. Validation executes MITRE ATT&CK techniques in controlled environments, proving which attack paths succeed. Mobilization drives NIST CSF Respond and Recover through structured workflows, closing validated exposures within defined SLAs. This continuous cycle replaces point-in-time assessments with ongoing validation that frameworks work as intended. Why This Matters Now Adversaries move faster, often with AI-assisted automation. Monthly scans cannot keep up. CTEM enables preemptive defense by focusing resources on the small set of exposures that actually enable attacks. Start small. Pick one scope: external attack surface, identity, or your top revenue application. Prove value. Then expand. Security maturity is not about finding more issues. It is about closing the right ones. #CTEM #ExposureManagement #CybersecurityStrategy #RiskManagement #SecurityLeadership

Vulnerability severity has become a proxy for risk, even where it no longer reflects reality. For years, security teams have treated vulnerability management (VM) as the backbone of risk reduction. Traditional VM was built for IT environments, predictable devices, patchable systems, and repeatable workflows. Cyber-physical systems don’t work that way. Their risk profile is defined by what’s reachable, exploitable, and operationally consequential. This is where most organizations get blindsided. Three things break the model: 1. Exploitability ≠ Severity A CVSS “medium” can be the most actively exploited vulnerability in the wild. A “critical” can be effectively harmless if the device is isolated, segmented, or has compensating controls in place. Static scoring doesn’t reflect attacker intent, capability, or speed of weaponization. 2. Blast Radius Matters More Than the CVE In CPS environments, a single exploited device can: Halt production, shut down clinical workflows, disrupt logistics, and disable safety systems Two vulnerabilities with identical severity can have completely different downstream effects depending on where they sit in the topology and how other assets depend on them. 3. “Patch It” Isn’t an Option Most CPS assets: → cannot be patched during production → run OS versions that are no longer supported → require vendor approval for updates → have uptime requirements that make maintenance windows impossible VM programs built around patch cycles will always fail here. A meaningful model must integrate: ↳ Exploitability Is the vulnerability being weaponized? Is it known-exploited? How quickly is it spreading? ↳ Reachability Can an attacker actually get to the asset? How many attack paths lead to it? Which compensating controls exist (or don’t)? ↳ Operational Impact If compromised, does it impact safety? Clinical care, production, or critical infrastructure? ↳ Business Criticality A vulnerability on a lab test system ≠ , the same vulnerability on a surgical robot, or a tier-1 manufacturing line. ↳ Blast Radius What happens after a compromise? Does it cascade? Does it pivot into IT, cloud, identity systems, or other operational networks? This is why analysts across all three reports converge on the same conclusion: Risk lives at the intersection of assets, findings, environment, and operational workflows. CPS environments can’t be defended with linear IT-driven VM programs. And they can’t be secured by looking at vulnerabilities in isolation. The organizations gaining an advantage are the ones shifting to models that: → combine asset intelligence with context → correlate vulnerabilities with real attack paths → evaluate impact through operational and physical consequences → prioritize based on business outcomes, not lists → drive remediation through workflows, not spreadsheets Because in CPS security, what matters is which vulnerabilities can hurt you, and why.

Smart vulnerability prioritization is key for managing security risks effectively. It's not just about high, medium, or low severity - there's more to consider: 1. Asset context: How is the vulnerable asset used? Is it exposed to the internet? Running with high-level privileges? 2. Threat intel: Is there an active exploit out there? Are bad actors targeting this vulnerability? 3. Business impact: How important is this asset to keeping things running? 4. Ease of exploit: How simple is it to take advantage of? Are we talking remote code execution or just service disruption? 5. Existing safeguards: Are there already protections in place? By looking at these factors and others, companies can focus on fixing the truly risky vulnerabilities first. This helps security teams work smarter, not harder, tackling the most pressing issues. Many modern vulnerability management tools are now baking these contextual factors into how they prioritize risks. When shopping for solutions, keep an eye out for those that go beyond basic CVSS scores to give you a more detailed risk picture.

Dear Cloud Auditors, Auditing Cloud Vulnerability Management and Threat Detection In cloud environments, speed is both a superpower and a security liability. Every new deployment, API, or configuration change introduces potential weaknesses faster than traditional controls can adapt. That’s why a mature vulnerability management and threat detection framework is the foundation of resilience in the cloud. As cloud auditors, our goal is to determine whether an organization truly understands its exposure, prioritizes intelligently, and responds decisively. 📌 Map what you’re protecting You can’t defend what you don’t see. A strong audit begins by confirming whether the organization maintains a complete and current asset inventory across all cloud environments. Virtual machines, containers, and serverless workloads each demand visibility. Without it, vulnerability scans are guesswork, not governance. 📌 Assess scanning and remediation discipline Speed without structure invites chaos. Review whether vulnerability scanning is continuous, automated, and integrated into CI/CD pipelines. Are findings triaged and tracked through closure, or do they linger in forgotten dashboards? A mature program treats remediation timelines as measurable performance indicators, not “best efforts.” 📌 Evaluate how risk is prioritized Not all vulnerabilities deserve equal attention. An effective process ties vulnerability data to business impact, leveraging risk scoring models that consider exploitability, exposure, and asset criticality. The audit should verify that decision-making is risk-driven, not reactionary. 📌 Probe the threat detection ecosystem Threat detection is where prevention meets reality. Review how the organization fuses automation and intelligence: cloud-native tools, SIEM integrations, anomaly detection, and behavioral analytics. The best programs pair these technologies with human context, analysts who can separate signal from noise. 📌 Ensure response is connected and continuous Detection is meaningless without action. Confirm that alerts flow into incident response playbooks, and that lessons learned loop back into vulnerability management for continuous improvement. When auditors evaluate vulnerability and threat programs through this lens, they move from checking compliance to validating resilience. Because in the cloud, the question isn’t if you’ll be targeted, it’s how prepared you’ll be when you are. #CloudAudit #VulnerabilityManagement #ThreatDetection #CyberResilience #CloudSecurity #ITAudit #CyberRisk #SecurityOperations #CloudGovernance #AuditLeadership #CyberVerge #CyberYard

Yesterday I ran OWASP's new AIVSS framework on our enterprise AI agents. 7 out of 10 scored "Critical." My hands were shaking when I saw the results. Not from fear. From validation. We've been securing AI like it's 2010 software. It's not. It's a loaded weapon with admin access. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💀 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗜𝗩𝗦𝗦 𝗦𝗖𝗢𝗥𝗘𝗦 𝗧𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗞𝗜𝗟𝗟𝗘𝗗 𝗠𝗘: • 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗔𝗜 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗠𝗶𝘀𝘂𝘀𝗲: 8.7/10 (CRITICAL) Your agent's code interpreter is a backdoor waiting to happen. • 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝗩𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: 7.6/10 (HIGH) Agents inherit permissions for 30 minutes after tasks. Attackers need 5. • 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗖𝗮𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗙𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀: 7.1/10 (HIGH) One compromised agent → entire payment system down in 11 minutes. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚨 𝗪𝗛𝗬 𝗬𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗔𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗦 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗘 𝗕𝗢𝗠𝗕𝗦: 𝗔𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗻𝗼𝗺𝘆 + 𝗧𝗼𝗼𝗹 𝗔𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 = 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗵𝗲 Your agents can: • Execute code autonomously • Retain elevated permissions • Communicate with other agents • Access production databases • Modify their own goals And you're protecting them with... WAF rules? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✅ 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝟱-𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗣 𝗔𝗜𝗩𝗦𝗦 𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗠𝗘𝗡𝗧 (𝗗𝗢 𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗧𝗢𝗗𝗔𝗬): 1️⃣ 𝗠𝗮𝗽 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗸 𝗙𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 Rate each factor 0-1: Autonomy, Tool Use, Memory, Dynamic Identity 2️⃣ 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗔𝗔𝗥𝗦 𝗦𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲 Sum your 10 risk factors. Above 6.5? You're in the danger zone. 3️⃣ 𝗥𝘂𝗻 𝗖𝗩𝗦𝗦 𝘃𝟰 𝗕𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗦𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲𝘀 Standard vulnerability scoring still applies. Don't skip it. 4️⃣ 𝗨𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗜𝗩𝗦𝗦 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 Run your agents through the official OWASP AIVSS Calculator Combines CVSS v4.0 + Agentic Risk Amplification Factors in real-time Get your final score + radar visualization + PDF report 🔥 𝗧𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀: https://lnkd.in/etRmuJKA 5️⃣ 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 Start with Tool Misuse. Always. It's your biggest attack surface. 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻: Disable code execution on customer-facing agents. Takes 5 minutes. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📊 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗥𝗨𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗧𝗛: 33% of enterprise apps will have agentic AI by 2028. Most organizations lack formalized agentic AI security assessments today. That gap? It's where breaches live. Your "GPT wrapper with admin access" isn't innovation. It's negligence with a chatbot interface. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔴 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗛𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗦 𝗡𝗘𝗫𝗧: 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗱: Score their agents weekly. Fix critical gaps NOW. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗼𝘂𝘀: "Our agents are behind a VPN, we're fine." 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗩𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗺𝘀: Next quarter's breach headlines. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ You have agents in production right now. Which one would kill your business first? ___________ ♻️ Repost if your agents have more permissions than your junior devs ➕ Follow Mohammad Syed for AI & Cybersecurity insights

Tip for Instructional Designers: Design Learning Activities to Be Fully Operable by Keyboard. When creating digital content, quizzes, or interactive components, ensure that users can navigate and operate all functionality using only the keyboard. Many learners rely entirely on the keyboard due to motor disabilities or because they use assistive technologies like screen readers. If an activity can’t be completed without a mouse, it’s not accessible and needs revision. How to Test Basic Navigation: Tab: Move forward through interactive elements (links, buttons, form fields). Shift + Tab: Move backward through interactive elements. Enter: Activate a link or button. Spacebar: Activate a button or toggle a checkbox. How to Test Form Controls: Checkbox: Press the Spacebar to check or uncheck. Radio Buttons: Use Arrow keys (Up/Down or Left/Right) to move between options. Press Spacebar to select an option. Select Menus (Dropdowns): Use Arrow keys to navigate options. Press Spacebar to open the menu. Use Enter or Esc to select an option and close the menu. Dialogs and Modals: Press Esc to close the dialog. Focus should be trapped inside the modal while it’s open. When closed, focus should return to the element that triggered the modal. Important Notes: Always ensure that a visible focus indicator (like an outline or highlight) shows which element is currently active. Make sure all interactive elements are operable with the keyboard alone. If a learner can’t complete the task using just the keyboard, the activity needs to be revised to meet accessibility requirements. Learn more in the comments.

I recently spoke about the unique challenges of vulnerability management within healthcare IT. Managing vulnerabilities in this sector isn't just about identifying and patching weaknesses; it's a comprehensive process that requires a detailed understanding of the assets and their associated risks. 🔍 Key Steps in Vulnerability Management: - Discovery: Identify all assets within the organization, assess their criticality and risk levels. This includes everything from data to the systems and machines that support operations. - Assessment: Perform scans and tests to uncover vulnerabilities. This could involve automated scans, penetration testing, and threat modeling. - Reporting: Communicate findings to relevant parties to initiate remediation. This ensures that the discovered vulnerabilities are addressed promptly. - Remediation: Fix the identified vulnerabilities, often requiring coordination with IT teams or third-party vendors. - Verification: Reassess the systems to ensure vulnerabilities are resolved, maintaining the integrity and security of the IT infrastructure. 🏥 In healthcare, vulnerability management often involves manual interventions due to the sensitive nature of the equipment, like MRI machines, which might need updates via a USB drive during scheduled downtimes. This demands a precise balance between maintaining operational availability and securing critical systems against potential threats. 🔄 This cycle of discovery, assessment, reporting, remediation, and verification is essential but complex, especially in environments where IT resources are limited and the stakes are high. Ensuring the security of healthcare IT systems is not just about protecting data but safeguarding the very tools and technologies that support patient care. #HealthcareIT #Cybersecurity #VulnerabilityManagement #HealthcareSecurity #ITSecurity