Best Practices for Remote Team Meetings

Your next 1-on-1 is either building trust or breaking it. Most managers treat them like status updates. Most employees see them as obligations. After years of leading teams through growth and crisis, I've learned the truth: The best 1-on-1s aren't meetings. They're investments in human potential. When done right, these 30 minutes can transform: • Disengaged employees into champions • Surface problems become solutions • Good performers into great leaders Here's how to make every 1-on-1 count: For Managers: 1/ Start human, not tactical "What's on your mind?" beats "What's your update?" every time. Let them drive the agenda first. 2/ Listen like your success depends on it Because it does. Their challenges are your early warning system. Their wins are your team's momentum. 3/ Ask the question that matters "What support do you need?" Then actually provide it. Trust compounds when promises are kept. For Employees: 1/ Come with intention This is your time. Own it. Bring your real challenges, not just safe updates. 2/ Share what's actually blocking you Your manager can't fix what they can't see. But come with potential solutions too. It shows you're thinking, not just venting. 3/ Talk about tomorrow, not just today Where do you want to grow? What skills are you building? Make your development their priority. Great 1-on-1s don't just review work. They build relationships. They surface insights. They prevent fires instead of fighting them. The game-changer most miss: End every 1-on-1 with absolute clarity: 📌 What are the next steps? 📌 Who owns what? 📌 When will we check progress? Vague endings create frustrated teams. Your people don't need another meeting. They need a moment where someone truly sees them, hears them, and helps them win. Give them that, and watch what happens. What's one thing that transformed your 1-on-1s? ♻️ Repost if this changes how you approach 1-on-1s Follow Desiree Gruber for more insights on storytelling, leadership, and brand building.

Most 1:1s fall apart because they slowly turn into weekly status updates…or low-key therapy…or a mix of both. And once that happens, they start feeling VERY skippable. If you want your 1:1s to do more than just fill time, actually help your team learn and make progress, this is a format that actually works. Think of this as a guide, not a script. You won’t hit every point every time. A 1:1 format you can actually use every fortnight: 1️⃣ What’s been on your mind since we last spoke? Sets the tone. Human, not performative. 2️⃣ Where has work felt a bit stuck or harder than it needs to be? Keeps the conversation practical, not venty. 3️⃣ What are you trying to get better at right now? Keeps learning alive without turning the meeting into a goal-setting exercise. 4️⃣ What progress have you noticed, even small? Builds momentum without turning it into a performance review. 5️⃣ What’s one thing you want to move forward before we meet again? Light accountability with one clear next step. 6️⃣ What support do you need? No guessing plus support can come from anywhere. This works because it’s not about covering everything. It’s about making the time useful. Some weeks you’ll spend most of the 1:1 on one question. And some weeks you might move quickly through a few. Either way, you're having a way better conversation about learning and progress, plus what you both want out of work. If your 1:1s have been feeling a bit *optional* lately, try this next week. And if you know a manager whose 1:1s have quietly turned into calendar clutter, share this with them. #microlearing #managertips #workadvice

I'm often the last to speak in a group meeting, even though I have a lot to say. It's because I wear hearing aids. Many meetings have "organic" conversations where participants jump in or unmute to speak. In these types of conversations, I don't know when there's a real opening to speak. When I take a chance and start speaking, sometimes someone else is speaking at the same time. I might not have heard them or I may have had a delayed interpretation of the sound. This creates a situation where I'm speaking over someone else, but I'm not doing it on purpose, and that's not something I would ever want to do. Rather than take a chance by jumping in, now I raise my hand (virtually or in person), type in the chat, or tell someone near me I have something to add. When speaking space is created for me, then I feel pressure to say everything I need to say in that moment and to make my moment count because it'll typically be a while before I get to speak again. This is stressful. Sometimes I even miss my moment to say what I want to say, and the meeting moves on. What works much better for me is when meetings and group conversations are truly *facilitated* and when equitable participation is prioritized. Want to be better at this? Here are some ideas you can try: - Ask everyone to use the raise hand button, call on people in order - Create space for speakers you haven't heard from yet. Ask: "Is there anyone who hasn't had a chance to speak yet who would like to add something?" - Check the chat and include chat contributions in the verbal conversation - Get comfortable with silence and don't move onto another topic too quickly What are your thoughts on this? Do you have any other suggestions? #Inclusion #Disability #Meetings

Neurodiversity 101: Making meetings more neuroinclusive Meetings are meant to bring people together to share ideas, make decisions, and build connection. Yet, for many neurodivergent colleagues and often for others too meetings can be overwhelming, confusing, or simply unproductive. Have you ever been to a meeting and wondered why you were there or what was expected of you? Whether online or in person, more inclusive meetings benefit everyone. They create clarity, structure, and safety for diverse thinkers to contribute meaningfully. Here’s how to make meetings more neuroinclusive: 1. Clarity before you start Share the purpose, agenda, timing, and who’s attending where possible in advance. Make clear if attendance is optional or essential and what preparation, if any, is expected. Sending materials early gives everyone time to process and plan. 2. Structure supports inclusion Outline how questions will be handled and what turn-taking looks like. Minute key actions and share them promptly. End by explaining what happens next. Predictability reduces anxiety and ensures accountability. Be aware of the 'quiet ones' in the room and ensure everyone can participate. 3. Inclusive communication Use clear, plain language avoid “acronym fests.” Pause regularly to check understanding and invite clarification. Remember, silence doesn’t mean disengagement; some people need more time to formulate ideas. Some people may need time after the meeting to come back with their responses too. 4. Online inclusivity Show participants how to use platform features like captions, transcripts, or chat. Encourage written contributions and offer the option to keep cameras off to reduce sensory load/allow movement/ or just not seeing your own face all the time! Provide recordings or transcripts afterwards so people can review at their own pace. 5. Make space for every voice Avoid putting people on the spot. Allow time after the meeting for those who prefer to reflect before responding. Remember: the “quiet ones” may hold the most valuable insights. **Small changes, big impact Microaggressions — such as dismissing someone’s idea or using “humour” that excludes can and do erode trust. Inclusion grows when meetings feel psychologically safe and respectful. Neuroinclusive meetings are not just a “nice to have.” This is a universal design concept in action. They are cost-effective, efficient, and fair improving engagement, retention, and creativity. When everyone can contribute in their own way, we get better decisions and stronger teams. 🟣 Inclusion isn’t about changing people. It’s about changing the conditions so people can thrive. Can you add any other ideas of what works too?

Hybrid Meetings ≠ Inclusive Meetings. I’ve lived it - and here’s 5 practical tips to ensure everyone has a voice, regardless of location. I spent more than 10,000 hours in hybrid meetings while as a remote leader for The Clorox Company. I was often the 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 remote attendee - while the rest of the group sat together in a conference room at HQ. Here’s what I learned the hard way: 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗱𝗼𝗻’𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱, 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲... ...by showing who gets heard, who feels seen, and who gets left out. If you're leading a distributed or hybrid team, how you structure your meetings sends a loud message about what (and who) matters. 𝟱 𝘁𝗶𝗽𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗵𝘆𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗱 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀: 1️⃣ 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 – who will actively combat distance bias and invite input from all meeting members 2️⃣ 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗮 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲𝗿 – to monitor the chat and the raised hands, to launch polls and to free up the facilitator to focus on the flow 3️⃣ 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗴 𝗶𝗻 - so that there is equal access to the chat, polls, and reactions 4️⃣ 𝗕𝘂𝗱𝗱𝘆 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 – pair remote team members with in-room allies to help make space in the conversation and ensure they can see and hear everything 5️⃣ 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗽 𝗮 𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸𝘂𝗽 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻 – be ready with a Plan B for audio, video, or connectivity issues in the room 𝘞𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘧𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳? 𝗧𝗿𝘆 𝗮 𝗗𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹-𝗙𝗶𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴. If even one person is remote, have everyone log in from their own device from their own workspace to create a level playing field. 🔗 𝗚𝗲𝘁 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗽𝘀 for creating location-inclusive distributed teams in this Nano Tool I wrote for Wharton Executive Education: https://lnkd.in/eUKdrDVn #LIPostingDayApril

I am regularly asked this question: What are some practical ways you can help quieter people speak up in meetings, and draw out their valuable contributions? It’s an important question, because there are many reasons why people may not speak up. It is dangerous to assume that they have nothing to contribute. Some may feel that it’s rude to interrupt, feel anxious when under pressure to think on the spot, are unable to find a gap in a group of louder people, or have some other reason to not speak up. If you are a leader or chairing a discussion, there are things you can do to ensure quieter voices are heard. Here are three practical things that you can do at your next meeting: 1 Inform people of the discussion topic ahead of time. Quieter people can feel anxious and freeze up when put up on the spot. They may need time to think through things before sharing them. Providing background material beforehand allows them to be ready to share during the meeting. It is very likely their ideas will be well thought through and valuable. 2. Actively create space, especially if others are noisy. Quiet people can struggle to interrupt - they may feel it's impolite, need more time to interject, or their quieter voices may be drowned out. You can come up with a pre-arranged signal that people can use if they want to say something - such as a raised hand - and invite them to talk. You can also keep track of who has talked and who hasn’t, and invite anyone who hasn’t talked to do so. 3. Invite people to share things with you after the meeting. Just as quieter people may need time to assemble their thoughts before a meeting, they may think about things that were raised during the meeting, and have even more to contribute after reflecting. Invite people to talk to you some time afterwards. Then in the next meeting, bring up their contribution and invite them to share further. These three strategies are not overly time consuming, nor do they take much effort. However, they can have a significant impact on your quieter people feeling heard and included, and on how much value your organisation gains from their contribution. The ability to create space for quieter voices is an important inclusive leadership skill. Noticing and inviting quieter voices will likely add diverse perspectives to your discussions. How consciously do you create space for quieter people to be heard? #inclusion #listeningskills #management #inclusiveleadership #diversityandinclusion

Many early career professionals walk into 1:1s and wait for their manager to lead 🥸 Then, they leave wondering why nothing changes or why the conversations don't seem to take them anywhere. 1:1s are essential for providing momentum to your work, checking in on important topics and projects, and ensuring the development of a sound working relationship between you and your manager. Here are 3 things you can incorporate into your 1:1s to make them more effective ⬇️ ➡️ "Here's what I'm working on, and here's where I'm stuck." Reporting tasks is fine, but this doesn't necessarily show your accomplishments or outcomes. I like to share a specific challenge I've encountered since our last conversation and what I've already tried to navigate the challenge. This demonstrates initiative, problem-solving skills, and gives your manager something tangible to support you with. ➡️ "I'd like feedback on [specific thing]." Vague requests get vague answers. Dancing around a problem or a topic that you need straightforward insight on is worth asking about directly. Talk with your supervisor about a particular project, presentation, or skill. "How did I do on the report I shared with you on Tuesday?" is better than "Do you have any feedback for me?" ➡️ "I'm interested in [opportunity/skill/project]. What would help me get there?" Your supervisor may have some ideas about what you can work on and what you might be interested in, but they can't read your mind. If you want to grow in a certain direction or learn a new skill, speak up about it. Ask your supervisor what steps, people, or visibility would support your professional goals.

As a leader, holding regular one-to-one meetings with your direct reports is not optional. It is fundamental to strong leadership and effective business operations. These conversations are invaluable for sharing updates, understanding workload pressures, and addressing the issues that matter most to each individual. In hybrid or remote settings, their importance becomes even more pronounced. Without these touchpoints, trust weakens and engagement declines. Skilled leaders understand that their role in these meetings is not to dominate, but to listen. A useful benchmark is to spend 70% to 80% of the time listening, and no more than 20% to 30% speaking. This creates space for your team member to think aloud, feel heard, and build confidence. Consider these three principles to strengthen the impact of your one-to-ones: Rescheduling may sometimes be necessary, but avoid cancelling altogether. It sends an unspoken message that your team member’s time or concerns are not a priority. Consistency builds trust, while disruption can undermine it. These meetings are primarily for them. Encourage your team member to set the agenda, raise questions, and surface challenges. Your role is to listen actively, ask thoughtful questions, and support their problem-solving. There is no need to steer the conversation unless asked. Allow enough time for meaningful dialogue and avoid ending the session abruptly. Rushing the conversation, especially when important or sensitive topics emerge, may discourage openness and reduce future engagement. To help manage my own speaking-to-listening ratio, I use Microsoft Teams' Speaker Coach. It provides a simple breakdown of my speaking time, highlights when I am dominating the discussion, and offers feedback on tone, pace, and inclusivity. The real-time prompts help me pause, ask more intentional questions, and ensure others have the space to express themselves fully. Why not try it today with your Friday catch-ups? #Business #Leadership #Engagement

When we talk about inclusive cultures we often forget that the way we run meetings can make others feel excluded. Most of us have experienced this at some point. You walk into a meeting ready to contribute... and you’re asked to take the notes instead. You start to make a point... and you’re interrupted before you finish the sentence. No one means to upset you. But when taking up airtime becomes a power game, studies show certain voices are consistently sidelined. (Women are 33% more likely to be interrupted in a meeting according to McKinsey & Company) Research has shown that in group discussions, interruptions are overwhelmingly directed at women, not because of competence, but because of deeply ingrained norms around who is “meant” to speak, lead, and conclude conversations. Deborah Tannen, Professor of Linguistics at Georgetown University, says: “Men tend to speak to determine status. Women tend to speak to build connection.” When meetings reward only one style, we quietly lose insight, creativity, and trust. Over time, some of us may disengage... not because we have nothing to say, but because the room hasn’t made space to hear us. So what can help? A few small design choices can change the entire dynamic of a meeting: 1 - Read the room before you speak. Pause and ask yourself: Am I interrupting for clarity, or just to get airtime? A thought that can wait often lands better when it’s invited. 2 - Remove unnecessary hierarchy. The person at the “head” of the table often sets who feels allowed to speak. Different seating, shared facilitation, or even a change of environment can flatten this without a single rule being announced. 3 - Offer more than one way to contribute. Not everyone processes out loud. Shared docs, chat threads, or follow‑up notes give people space to contribute on their own terms and often surface the most thoughtful ideas. 4 - Always have a host. A clear host is not about control, it’s about care for participants. They hold the agenda, protect the flow, and gently intervene when interruptions happen. This matters even more online. In virtual meetings, one simple tactic helps: wait three seconds after someone stops speaking before you jump in. It feels awkward at first, but that pause often invites in the person who was about to speak and decided not to. A slightly uncomfortable silence is far more productive than a room where only the fastest voices win. Inclusive meetings aren’t about being “nice”. They’re about designing conversations where the best thinking has space to emerge. Tell me, what’s the smallest change you’ve seen make the biggest difference in meetings?

🎯 Inclusive Meetings Don’t Just Happen — They’re Designed with Intention 📌 The loudest voices shouldn’t be the only ones heard. 📌 Have you ever left a company meeting feeling unseen or unheard? Maybe you couldn’t follow along without captions. Maybe your input was never invited. Or maybe the conversation felt centered around one culture, one time zone, one perspective. Here’s the truth: inclusion doesn’t happen by accident—it’s designed through intention and awareness. 🧩 Four Steps to More Inclusive Meetings and Events 1️⃣ Create Multiple Ways to Engage → Share agendas and questions in advance. → Use polls, chat, or collaborative docs for input before, during, and after. → Allow asynchronous participation across time zones. 2️⃣ Integrate Accessibility as a Standard, Not a Request → Use auto-captioning and transcripts by default. → Provide visual, audio, and written formats. → Ensure physical and sensory accessibility. 3️⃣ Rethink “Participation” Norms → Rotate facilitation styles. → Normalize “pass” as a valid response. → Create conditions where quieter voices feel safe to contribute. 4️⃣ Review Timing, Language, and Cultural Awareness → Check for time zone equity and cultural observances. → Avoid slang and Western idioms. → Use visuals or multilingual support for clarity. 👉 When inclusion becomes part of how you meet—not an afterthought—engagement, trust, and collaboration rise naturally. 🌍 Ready to build meetings that unite rather than divide? Let’s talk about how your organization can design for equity and belonging from the inside out. 👉 Schedule your FREE Clarity Call today. #InclusiveLeadership #CulturalCompetence #InclusiveMeetings #Neurodiversity #LeadershipDevelopment #WorkplaceCulture