🔎 How To Redesign Complex Navigation: How We Restructured Intercom’s IA (https://lnkd.in/ezbHUYyU), a practical case study on how the Intercom team fixed the maze of features, settings, workflows and navigation labels. Neatly put together by Pranava Tandra. 🚫 Customers can’t use features they can’t discover. ✅ Simplifying is about bringing order to complexity. ✅ First, map out the flow of customers and their needs. ✅ Study how people navigate and where they get stuck. ✅ Spot recurring friction points that resonate across tasks. 🚫 Don’t group features based on how they are built. ✅ Group features based on how users think and work. ✅ Bring similar things together (e.g. Help, Knowledge). ✅ Establish dedicated hubs for key parts of the product. ✅ Relocate low-priority features to workflows/settings. 🤔 People don’t use products in predictable ways. 🤔 Users often struggle with cryptic icons and labels. ✅ Show labels in a collapsible nav drawer, not on hover. ✅ Use content testing to track if users understand icons. ✅ Allow users to pin/unpin items in their navigation drawer. One of the helpful ways to prioritize sections in navigation is by layering customer journeys on top of each other to identify most frequent areas of use. The busy “hubs” of user interactions typically require faster and easier access across the product. Instead of using AI or designer’s mental model to reorganize navigation, invite users and run a card sorting session with them. People are usually not very good at naming things, but very good at grouping and organizing them. And once you have a new navigation, test and refine it with tree testing. As Pranava writes, real people don’t use products in perfectly predictable ways. They come in with an infinite variety of needs, assumptions, and goals. Our job is to address friction points for their realities — by reducing confusion and maximizing clarity. Good IA work and UX research can do just that. [Useful resources in the comments ↓] #ux #IA
Reducing User Effort in Navigation
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Reducing user effort in navigation means designing websites and apps so people can find what they need quickly and easily, without getting overwhelmed or confused. The goal is to make navigation so clear and intuitive that users hardly notice it, allowing them to focus on their tasks instead of figuring out where to go.
- Organize by user needs: Group features and menu items based on how people naturally think and work, not how the company structures its products.
- Make important actions obvious: Place key features at the beginning and end of menus, and limit choices to avoid overwhelming visitors.
- Reduce mental steps: Provide clear cues and group related actions so users don’t have to pause and wonder what to do next.
-
-
I found a client's bestseller buried in a 47 item dropdown. But it drove 90% of their sales. This is choice overload in action. Psychologist Barry Schwartz proved that too many options paralyze decisions. When faced with overwhelming choices, customers don't choose better. They choose nothing. Our client had exactly this problem. Their "Shop" dropdown listed dozens of products with no hierarchy. Just an alphabetical wall of text. Their flagship product sat somewhere in the middle. Invisible. The serial positioning effect explains why this matters. We remember the first and last items in any list. Everything in the middle blurs together. So we restructured their navigation. Core products moved to the first and last positions. Secondary items organized by customer intent, not internal categories. Result: $1.4 million in additional annual revenue. Same products, same traffic, and same checkout. The only change was removing a psychological barrier customers couldn't articulate. Your customers make 35,000 decisions daily. By the time they reach your site, they're already exhausted. The fix is simpler than you think: Limit top-level nav to 7 items (the brain's processing limit). Put your most important items first and last. Structure around customer goals, not internal departments. Don't ask them to work harder. Guide them to what they need.
-
6 clicks to find the "𝐒𝐚𝐯𝐞" button. I watched a user navigate a fintech dashboard. They were lost in their own product. The product manager sitting next to me whispered: "This happens every user test." Here's what went wrong. Every time they added a feature, they added a new menu. Payment reports? ➞ New sidebar. User settings? ➞ Different dropdown. Export data? ➞ Hidden somewhere else. Year 1: Clean and simple. Year 3: A maze. One developer told me: "I add shortcuts every sprint just so users can find stuff." Band-aid after band-aid. The dashboard became a puzzle even the team couldn't solve. We didn't add more menus. We built one navigation system for everything. Global Nav Module: → Every feature lives in one clear place → Same logic, every time → New features plug in without breaking old paths Think of it like organizing a house. Instead of hiding things in random rooms, everything has its spot. Users learn once. Find anything forever. Results: ✓ 40% fewer clicks to reach any action ✓ Zero nav patches needed ✓ New features added in hours, not days Best feedback? A user messaged support: "Did you make the app faster? Everything feels quicker." We didn't touch speed. We just made things findable. After fixing 50+ dashboards, I see the same mistake: Teams treat navigation like decoration. It's not. Navigation is your product's skeleton. Mess it up early, and every new feature makes it worse. Good navigation? Users don't even notice it. They just... get things done. Open your product. Try to find your most-used feature. Count the clicks. More than 3? You're losing users every day. What's the hardest thing to find in YOUR product?
-
Most designers don’t struggle with what patterns exist… They struggle with when to use which one. That’s where real UX maturity shows. Here’s how top designers actually think about navigation 👇 🔹 It’s not about UI patterns — it’s about user intent density → High frequency actions = always visible → Secondary actions = progressive reveal 🔹 Every navigation choice is a trade-off → Visibility vs. screen space → Speed vs. cognitive load → Flexibility vs. clarity 🔹 Great UX reduces decisions, not adds options → If users have to “figure out where to go,” you’ve already lost 🔹 Context > consistency → The same app can use different navigation patterns across flows → Because user goals change, not just screens 🔹 Thumb zone is not a guideline — it’s a constraint → If it’s hard to reach, it won’t be used (no matter how pretty it is) 🔹 The best navigation is often invisible → Users don’t notice it… because everything just works Most portfolios show components. Top 1% designers show decision-making. That’s the difference between designing screens… and designing experiences. What’s one navigation decision you changed that improved UX massively? 👇
-
Smart UX doesn’t make users work less. It makes them think less. Good design isn’t about removing steps for the sake of speed. It’s about removing mental effort—the hesitation, the second-guessing, the “wait… what now?” A client once told me: “Can we remove a few steps? Users are dropping.” When we dug in, the problem wasn’t the number of steps. It was that each step asked users to make a decision they weren’t ready for. We didn’t delete essentials. We clarified intent. We grouped related actions. We added cues so users didn’t have to interpret what came next. Same steps. Half the confusion. Much better completion. That’s when it clicked for the team: Removing steps can break trust. Removing mental load builds it. When the experience is clear: • Decisions feel obvious • Actions feel natural • Progress feels effortless If users have to pause and figure things out, the problem isn’t them. It’s the design. Less confusion. More momentum. That’s Smart UX.
-
Here's a story highlighting how you can improve a community without any significant changes. 👇 In one client project, members complained about the community's navigation. They said it was impossible to find what they were looking for. They often felt lost. They struggled to follow and find the discussions they had participated in. The community team had been trying everything to fix the problem. They had redesigned and simplified the homepage, created onboarding journeys, and used every feature their platform offered to help members find what they wanted. This had helped a little, but it was still the number one problem members complained about. We took a different approach. Instead of making it easier to find each feature in the community, we simply removed the majority of them. → Every feature not used by at least 30% of active members was removed. → Any category which wasn’t attracting several hundred posts per month was archived/merged with other categories. → Any page not visited by at least 1k people per month was deleted (except for terms and conditions). → Any member who hadn’t visited within the past two years was notified and removed. → Only two of the 20+ groups had any meaningful activity level, so we created a discussion category for this and removed groups as a feature. → Any discussion which 50+ people hadn’t visited within the past year was archived. → We even removed the majority of options from member profiles too. → We reduced the navigation menu from 8 options (with drop-down sub-menus) to just 3 (without sub-menus). Three things immediately happened. 1️⃣ Navigation dropped from the number one cited problem in the community to the 4th. 2️⃣ The level of participation increased by an average of 22% year on year. 3️⃣ Search traffic increased by 17% year on year. The key to improving navigation (and the entire member experience) in most mature communities is not improving the quality of maps but reducing the number of roads. It’s harder to get lost when there are fewer places to go.
-
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗰𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗯 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁: 𝗔𝗻 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗨𝗜/𝗨𝗫 𝗚𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 Here’s a little UX anecdote to chew on: Back in the early 2000s, a major e-commerce website noticed something strange. Customers were abandoning their carts midway, not because of pricing or product issues but because they couldn’t remember how they got there. The solution? Breadcrumb navigation. A simple trail showing users their path—like “Home > Electronics > Smartphones > Accessories”—reduced drop-offs by 15%. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆? In the rush to design sleek, minimalist interfaces, many designers overlook breadcrumbs. But here’s the thing: breadcrumbs aren’t just for large websites. They’re essential for any interface where users move through multiple levels of content or steps. 🔑 The overlooked power of breadcrumbs: 1️⃣ 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁: They give users a sense of place, reducing cognitive load. 2️⃣ 𝗘𝘀𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝗥𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗲: Users can jump back without hunting for the menu, improving navigation. 3️⃣ 𝗦𝗘𝗢 𝗕𝗼𝗼𝘀𝘁: On websites, they improve crawlability and search rankings. 𝗣𝗿𝗼 𝗧𝗶𝗽: Design breadcrumbs that are clean and clickable. For mobile, consider collapsible breadcrumbs to save screen space while retaining functionality. Remember, even the most experienced designers sometimes undervalue simple tools. But in UX, it’s often the simplest solutions that create the biggest impact. 💬 Have you used breadcrumbs in a unique way recently? Or maybe you’ve encountered a design where they saved the day? Share your thoughts below! 🖍✨ #UXDesign #BreadcrumbNavigation #UIUXTips #WebDesign #UserExperience #MinimalistUI #NavigationDesign #CognitiveLoad #SEOBoost #UXStrategy #DesignInnovation #UserJourney #UXInspiration #WebsiteDesign #DesignForMobile #EcommerceDesign
-
We removed big, colorful tiles, and customers bought more. Minimalist navigation is undefeated. We tested 2 variations of subcategory layouts on our category pages: Control: Large, colorful subcategory tiles (standard setup) Variation 1: Smaller tiles with images retained Variation 2: Minimal text-only tiles with no background images The results: Variation 2 (text-only, minimal design): - Revenue per user: +2.87% (statistically significant) - Average order value: +1.70% - Conversion rate: +1.15% The psychology: By reducing visual complexity and choice paralysis, we helped users focus on what they actually came for: The products. Our heatmaps showed that users were spending less time deciding between subcategories and more time engaging with actual products - exactly the behavior we want! What's your experience with category navigation?
-
Our 9-figure supplement client was bleeding revenue through their navigation. So we took a different approach. We design navigation solely for profit. Here's what we did: 1️⃣ Strategic Separation: - Split shoppable links (Shop by Benefit, Shop by Product, Bestsellers) from non-shoppable links (About, Reviews, Shipping Info, FAQs) - Made shoppable sections visually prominent on the first level - Moved secondary links to clearly marked secondary sections 2️⃣ Dynamic Bestsellers Section: - Added top 4 products with images, reviews, and benefit-driven copy - Made it dynamic so it automatically adjusts based on sales data 3️⃣ Data-Driven Category Optimization: - Used Clarity heatmap data instead of guesswork to reorder categories - Identified low-performing categories like "anti-aging" and "mood" - Added missing "weight loss" category for their growing product line 4️⃣ Mobile-First Strategy: - Optimized mobile menu structure (their primary traffic source) - Created clear visual hierarchy for purchase-focused navigation - Reduced cognitive load for their older, less tech-savvy audience The psychology here is simple. Shoppers shouldn't have to hunt for the buy button. Your menu should push them straight into high-intent buying paths. The results were significant: ✅ Visitors clicked into buying journeys faster ✅ Fewer distractions from non-revenue pages ✅ Stronger focus on top-converting products ✅ Better user experience for their specific demographic No new traffic. No ad spend. Just a navigation that sells.
-
Last year a B2B client asked us why their beautiful, award‑winning site wasn’t converting. When we audited the analytics, we found users bouncing after 15 seconds and form fills at 0.7%. Their navigation mirrored their org chart, not their buyer’s path. So we did something radical: we cut their navigation from 50 pages down to 7. We rewrote the CTA like a real person would ask, and we removed three internal jargon pages entirely. The result? Form fills jumped to 1.4% (a 100% lift) within six weeks. More importantly, prospects told the sales team, “Your site actually speaks to us.” Here’s what I learned: clarity converts. A “comprehensive” website isn’t customer‑centric if it forces your buyers to play hide‑and‑seek. 🔹 Would you feel confident leaving your 70‑page PowerPoint on the table for a buyer to sift through? 🔹 Which page on your site causes the most friction, and why is it still there? Has anyone else has seen similar results from ruthless simplification? #UXDesign #DigitalStrategy #B2BMarketing #ConversionRate #WebExperience
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Healthcare
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development