Collaborating with Cross-Disciplinary Teams

Too many teams leave their best ideas in the hallway after the meeting. You’ve been there. So have I. The meeting ends, and suddenly two people peel off, finally saying what they really think because the room didn’t feel safe enough, or small enough, or structured enough to surface the real conversation. This is where one of our most effective and underutilized High Return Practices comes in, what we call the Power of Three. Here’s how it works: Next time you're in a group meeting, whether it’s 5 people or 50, pause before opening the floor to broad discussion. Instead, break the group into trios for 5–8 minutes. Give each group one key issue or prompt to wrestle with. The purpose of this is to create psychological safety in small pods, so that truth has a better shot at surfacing. Why it works: In smaller groups, people self-edit less and speak more honestly. The act of writing down insights reinforces accountability and commitment. When trios share back to the whole team, they’re less likely to dilute or dodge hard truths because their pod is counting on them to carry the message. Here’s your quick-start guide: Step 1: Choose one key issue that requires input or debate. Step 2: Break the full group into triads (in person or virtually). Step 3: Give 5–8 minutes for open discussion. Prompt candor. Step 4: Ask each group to share one key insight or unresolved tension. Step 5: Capture it in a shared doc so the truth isn’t lost. In Never Lead Alone, we call these HRPs, High Return Practices. Not because they sound smart, but because they help teams operate smarter, faster, and with more courage. Try it this week. One agenda item. Three people. Eight minutes. It could be the difference between alignment and assumption.

Research reveals that the average professional spends 31 hours per month in unproductive meetings, wasting both time and energy. Poor planning, unclear objectives, over-inviting attendees, and poor leadership are some of the main culprits. To make meetings fewer and more effective, consider the following strategies: "Do You Really Need This?": Before scheduling, ask: Can this be solved via email, shared document, or a quick one-on-one conversation instead? "The Two-Pizza Rule": Keep meetings small, ideally no more than 6-8 people. Smaller groups foster focus, engagement, and meaningful contributions. "Agenda or Bust": No agenda, no meeting. Define the purpose, objectives, and time for each topic—distribute it in advance so everyone is prepared. "Keep Regular Meetings Short": Regular meetings should last no longer than 30-60 minutes and focus solely on the most important topics. "Two-Hour Max Rule": Even larger meetings (exception!) with multiple topics should never exceed 2 hours. Limit them to 4-5 topics and involve only the necessary stakeholders. "Time-Bound Follow-Up": Close every meeting with clear action steps, assigned owners, and deadlines. Without this, discussions lack tangible outcomes. "No Flashy Slides": Ditch colorful, overloaded presentations. Use minimal slides, focused on crisp, actionable insights—not decoration. "Own the Room": Assign a meeting owner to manage time, enforce the agenda, and ensure progress. This person keeps the group on track and accountable. Summary: Meetings are tools, not a substitute for clarity or action. Regular meetings should be short, focused, and deliberate, while longer sessions should be rare and strictly managed. The true purpose of meetings is to enable progress, not to appear busy or consume time unnecessarily. How do you ensure effective meetings? #meetings #productivity #effectiveness #leader #leadership

𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐨 𝐰𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐚 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐡𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐭𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟? 𝐖𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐦𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐞, 𝐢𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐝𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞. During my stint as Group Medical Director with Dr Lal Path Labs, I was introduced to the concept of a pre-read. Anyone scheduled to speak should share the slide deck with relevant information as a pre-read with all the attendees. This allows for everyone to know the context in advance, giving time to review the details and build their point of view, allowing for a healthy discussion, rather than understanding the contents during the presentation. Taking into account this simple philosophy, here's how I suggest 𝐦𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐲 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞, 𝐛𝐮𝐭 𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐮𝐦𝐩𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐭. 1. 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞: Arriving 5 minutes before the start of the meeting allows the meeting to start on time and also time to address any tech glitches that could come up in making the presentation. 2. 𝐏𝐫𝐞-𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥: Consider sharing pre-read materials or literature related to the agenda which ensures that all participants have the chance to do their homework, and come prepared with thoughts, notes, & ideas, making the meeting more focused & effective. 3. 𝐁𝐞 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐞: Interactive meetings where all participants contribute makes for a healthier discussion. 𝐈 𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 "𝐧𝐨 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐚𝐬 𝐬𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐮𝐬!" 4. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐍𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐬: It's not about scribbling down every word like a court stenographer. It's about capturing the non-negotiables, action points, and responsibilities in the moment. Consider them as not just records; they're your treasure map to the 'Aha!' moments that will help you think better and collaborate effectively post the discussion. 5. 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐬 𝐔𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐧𝐠 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬: Meeting minutes aren't meant to gather dust in your inbox; they're strategic tools. Break down minutes into bite-sized, achievable steps to ensure that discussions lead to tangible results. 6. 𝐏𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 & 𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭: How often do we jump from one meeting to another in a day? It's crucial to pause and reflect. Take a few minutes after the meeting to ponder on the discussed topics. Immediate reflection eliminates confusion and clutter, providing clarity when circling back to the key points. How do you approach meetings to ensure maximum productivity and efficiency? I would love to hear and learn from your insights. #preread #productivemeetings #DrSanjayArora

Want to know why most meetings are a complete waste of time? 🟢 Here are 7 best practices that actually work: 1. Set a clear agenda (24h before) → Share it with everyone → Include time slots for each topic 2. Keep it short (30min max) → Start on time → End on time → No exceptions 3. Invite only key players → Decision makers → Direct contributors → No "nice to have" attendees 4. Assign roles upfront → Meeting leader → Note taker → Timekeeper 5. No devices allowed → Phones away → Laptops closed → Full attention required 6. Follow the "2-minute rule" → If someone talks for more than 2 minutes → Politely interrupt → Keep discussions focused 7. End with clear action items → Who does what → Due dates → Follow-up schedule I've implemented these in my company for 3 years now. Result? • 85% higher team satisfaction • 100% better outcomes • 60% fewer meetings The secret? Consistency. You can't do this sometimes. You must do it EVERY single time. No shortcuts. No exceptions. Just results. Try these for a month. Watch your team's productivity surge. P.S. What's your biggest meeting pain point? Share below. 👇 #team #meetings #employees #productive

Too many meetings? A new study challenges many things we think we know about meeting overload. Here's what the researchers discovered. 1) Size matters For small teams (under 6 people), "meet when needed" works beautifully. But there's a tipping point: as teams grow larger, flexible scheduling becomes a disaster. With larger teams, someone will almost always want to meet (of course!), leading to constant interruptions. 2) Too few meetings Surprisingly, the study found that teams often suffer more from too few meetings than too many! Workers reported more frustration when they couldn't coordinate (missing crucial alignments) than when they had to attend "unnecessary" meetings. Example: A developer needing input on architecture decisions might waste days going in the wrong direction because they couldn't get timely coordination with colleagues. 3) Smart rules beat simple rules In diverse teams (different roles, productivity levels, schedules), basic rules like "meet every Monday" aren't enough. The research recommends these approaches instead: - Minimum gaps between meetings (e.g., 48 hours of focus time) - Maximum time without meetings (e.g., never go more than 5 days) - Multiple-person approval for new meetings Example: A software team might block off Tuesday/Thursday mornings as "no meeting zones" while requiring at least two developers to agree before scheduling additional meetings. 4) Fixed meetings For larger teams, standing meetings (e.g., every Friday at 3 PM) are remarkably effective. The data shows they never perform worse than 28% below optimal efficiency - making them a reliable choice, especially as teams scale. 5) The Hybrid Sweet Spot The most successful approaches combine: - Protected "quiet time" where meetings are prohibited - Designated "interaction time" when coordination is encouraged - This structured flexibility helps balance individual productivity with team alignment. Quick recap: As your team grows beyond 6-10 people, shift from ad-hoc scheduling to more structured approaches. But don't make them rigid - add smart safeguards to maintain flexibility while preventing both meeting overload and coordination drought. Source: Roels, G., & Corbett, C. J. (2024). Too Many Meetings? Scheduling Rules for Team Coordination. Management Science, 70(12), 8647–8667.

We don't prepare for effective meetings. But we can save time and boost outcomes with one rule. Here's how: Early in my career, I noticed meetings were often unproductive. 50% of the time was wasted without a clear agenda. So, I started using a 6-step formula to run meetings. 1. Prepare a Clear Agenda ↳ Create and distribute it in advance ↳ Include key topics: progress updates, challenges, tasks, decisions ↳ Set clear objectives for the meeting 2. Focus on Key Updates and Issues ↳ Start by reviewing action items from the previous meeting ↳ Have team members provide brief updates on their tasks and progress ↳ Discuss any roadblocks, challenges, or risks ↳ Prioritize the most important items for discussion 3. Encourage Participation ↳ Actively engage all team members to share updates and insights ↳ Allow time for problem-solving and brainstorming solutions 4. Manage Time Effectively ↳ Stick to the scheduled time for each agenda item ↳ Keep the meeting focused and on-track ↳ Consider setting a time limit for individual updates 5. Document Outcomes and Next Steps ↳ Assign clear action items and owners for follow-up tasks ↳ Summarize key decisions made and next steps ↳ Share meeting minutes/notes with all attendees afterward 6. Follow Up on Action Items ↳ Track commitments and hold people accountable. ↳ Ensure decisions are acted upon to maintain momentum Save this meeting rule: clear agenda → effective outcomes. Implement like a pro → Run meetings like a boss

Creating a next-generation OT SOC is less about chasing the latest tools and more about reshaping security teams so that IT and #OTsystems are no longer islands. As OT systems increasingly connect to the corporate IT environment and other IIoT systems, cyber defenders will need integrated visibility and a shared data set to recognize patterns and complexities in threat intelligence and correlation. To do this, top #industrial companies are shifting away from integrated teams and toward a single cyber team with integrated skills and abilities through convergence, delivering real value when it enables real-time analysis and automation, rather than noise and unnecessary information. Industrial Cyber spoke with industry experts to understand how the convergence of IT, #OT, and increasingly interconnected systems is reconfiguring #cybersecurity team structures, decision-making, and day-to-day operations across #criticalinfrastructure. They also explore where convergence has moved beyond theory to deliver tangible improvements in OT security, operational reliability, and system resilience. “IT risks are now OT risks and vice versa. Leveraging operational data inevitably demands the convergence of IT and OT, meaning corporate IT threats (malware, etc.) can directly affect OT systems,” Mark Ryan, team lead of DNV Cyber, said. “The line between what is OT and what is IT is blurred. Each customer, scenario, and request proposal shows a unique fingerprint of architectural, process, and industry-related concerns. Our OT SOC development program integrated industrial network sensors with enterprise SOC, enabling holistic monitoring of plants and offices together.” Saltanat Mashirova, senior manager for OT cybersecurity at CPX, sees IT/OT convergence fundamentally reshaping cybersecurity teams from siloed IT and OT functions into a more collaborative, risk-driven operating model. “In day-to-day operations, this means shared visibility, shared workflows, and much tighter collaboration between IT, OT engineers, and operations." “It’s more important than ever that teams are cross-functional, made up of ‘T-shaped’ members who are deeply skilled in their area of expertise, but also broad enough to understand and communicate with the ‘other side,’” David Formby, co-founder and CEO/CTO of Fortiphyd Logic, said. “Teams where IT has cross-trained on OT and OT cross-trained on IT are able to make more intelligent, consequence-driven decisions on triage and escalation of events.” Zakhar Bernhardt, an OT/ICS cybersecurity consultant at German automation company anapur AG, said that #OTenvironments are becoming more connected to IT systems and day-to-day business operations. “As a result, IT teams are increasingly involved in OT security and processes. For many organizations, OT directly supports core revenue, so protecting these environments is no longer optional.” 

🏆Cybersecurity is a team sport, and just like any team effort, success comes from true collaboration. Not just talking about what needs to be done but stepping up and taking action.   🤝 I’ve seen this firsthand. Whether it be joint threat hunts, rapid sharing of vulnerability intel, or coordinated incident responses, these partnerships deliver tangible results. Together, we’ve helped secure critical infrastructure against complex attacks and taken down cybercriminals.   At Forescout Technologies Inc., we collaborate with organizations like Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to share threat intelligence, standardize guidance, and protect #IT, #OT, #IoT, and #IoMT environments.   But we need more of this.   It’s like a relay race. If any teammate stumbles, we all fall behind. Governments, private industry, and researchers must keep passing the baton, but with an urgency for action. We need to see:   🔒 Faster deployment of Zero Trust and secure-by-design principles. 🔍 Accountability and transparency from manufacturers to design security into devices from day one. ⚙️ Scalable solutions that allow resource-constrained organizations to secure aging infrastructure.   Partnerships and information sharing are critical, but action is what keeps the lights on, the water running, and one another safe.   Is this the year we turn collaboration into real action? https://lnkd.in/gyxDBcS3   #Cybersecurity #SecureTogether #CriticalInfrastructure

A few weeks ago, after setting up the room for a workshop, I stepped out to make a quick phone call. By the time I returned, a bunch of participants had  arrived, found their seats, and pulled out their laptops—ready to watch something happen. Then, one participant approached me. “Where’s the screen?” she asked. “There aren’t any slides today,” I replied. She frowned slightly, as if to say, 'Then what am I here for?' It’s a familiar script: ✅ Someone calls the meeting. ✅ Someone holds the space. ✅ Everyone else sits back, listens, and waits to be led. I reckon the best leaders 'flip the room'. They break the passive, hierarchical default and generate real engagement. For as long as people are sitting back, waiting to be led, their true genius will never emerge. Flipping the room isn’t about taking control. It’s about giving it back. Here are 3 things to think about... 1. Don’t Command Attention—Create Shared Tension If you start by talking, you reinforce the ‘audience’ mindset. Instead, spark curiosity and involvement from the start: ❓ Ask: “What’s the biggest challenge on your mind today?” 💬 Start a conversation: “How are we feeling about X?” 🧩 Present a puzzle: “If something was missing from our strategy, what would it be?” 2. Pass the Mic How do you decide who speaks? Rank, charisma and forthrightness are dangerous reasons. In thriving teams, leaders build teams that generate the best ideas. So break the pattern: 🔄 Instead of answering a question, throw it back: “What do you think?” 🛠️ Instead of presenting a plan, ask them to build one: “How could we tackle this?” 🤔 Instead of being the one to pass the microphone, invite others to invite people to speak: “Who else do you want to hear from?” 3️⃣Perhaps try the 'rule of 3 passes' - something I shared in this LinkedIn post. 3. Set Shared Expectations Early If people assume they’re supposed to be in ‘receive mode,’ they’ll act like it. Change the expectation from the start: 🚫 Remove slides and tables—design a space for co-creation. 🔄 Frame the session differently: “This isn’t a presentation from me—it’s a session to co-create X.” ❓Ask: “By the end of this, what does each of us need to move forward?” Flipping the Room = Flipping Your Mindset To flip the room, you need to check your own expectations. Leadership isn’t about commanding attention—it’s about energising people to think, contribute, and make great progress. So next time you step into a room, don’t ask: How do I lead this meeting? Ask: How do I flip it? Over to you: What are the best ways to flip the room? (This photo is from a different room I worked in last week, with an executive leadership team. As you can see, flipping a room starts with the space you create. It was a very cool spot for meaningful conversation.) PS. If we haven't met before and you'd like to stay in touch, I welcome your connection request. #Leadership #Facilitation #Teamwork #Meetings

Over the past few months, our group made one small change that has had a surprisingly big impact: we switched our weekly group meetings to a memo-based format. It’s been transformative. Instead of spending group meetings clicking through slides, we now begin with 30 minutes of silent, focused reading and annotating a memo that lays out one member’s key results, open questions, and decisions needed. We then spend an hour unpacking those comments together. What used to be an “update session” has become a genuine problem-solving forum: deeper conversations, sharper hypotheses, and a far better use of everyone’s time. What I’ve appreciated the most: ➡️ Writing clarifies thinking. Students realize gaps and alternative explanations before the meeting even starts. 🧠 ➡️ Discussions now bring more group members in. Thoughtful written summaries create space for quieter voices to be heard. 🙋♀️ ➡️ We get a durable scientific record - something we can search, reference, and build on. 📕 ➡️ The overall pace of insight is faster, not because we meet more, but because we prepare better. 💡 It’s a reminder that sometimes the biggest advances come from rethinking the process, not adding more meetings. If you’ve experimented with similar formats in your groups or teams, I’d love to learn more about what has worked for you in the comments.