Recovering from Service Failures

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Recovering from service failures means having systems and strategies in place to quickly fix issues when things go wrong, whether in technology, customer service, or hospitality. It’s about restoring normal operations and rebuilding trust so that setbacks don’t damage relationships or business reputation.

  • Act quickly: Respond to service failures right away so customers feel heard and problems are addressed before they escalate.
  • Communicate clearly: Explain what happened and what steps you’re taking to resolve the issue, giving customers reassurance and transparency.
  • Learn and improve: Use every failure as an opportunity to update processes, train your team, and prevent similar issues in the future.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Naveen Reddy

    Building Roundz.ai - Community Driven Platform | SDE3 at Amazon

    11,017 followers

    𝗡𝗼 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁'𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗼𝗼𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗔𝗪𝗦 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗮𝗴𝗲. Two days back, internet was full of memes and posts around AWS outage. Today, AWS published complete detailed analysis around what went wrong and how they tackle the issue. Hardly seeing any learning post that came out. 𝗦𝗼 𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗲. Because if we don't learn from the biggest cloud provider's mistakes, we're setting ourselves up to repeat them. 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗱? 11:48 PM, October 19. A DNS race condition in DynamoDB. Two automation processes fighting each other. One deleted the active DNS plan while another was still using it. Every IP address for DynamoDB's regional endpoint vanished instantly. 14 hours of chaos followed. Not because the bug was complex. But because recovery became harder than the failure itself. 𝗛𝗲𝗿𝗲'𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽𝘀 𝗺𝗲 𝘂𝗽 𝗮𝘁 𝗻𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁: 🔧 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗮𝘂𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗺𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗶𝗴𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗸 AWS had redundant DNS management across three availability zones. Retry logic. Health checks. Years of reliable operation. Then one unusual delay triggered a latent race condition. The automation that was supposed to protect them became the attack vector. Ask yourself, does your automation have guardrails against itself? ⚡ 𝗗𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗺𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 DynamoDB failed. EC2 couldn't launch instances without DynamoDB. Network Load Balancers failed without EC2 network configs. Lambda throttled without stable NLBs. Each team built resilient systems. But nobody mapped the full dependency chain. One service down, nine services impacted. Draw your dependency graph today, not during the outage. 🔄 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗶𝘀𝗻'𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘂𝗿𝗲 DynamoDB DNS was fixed in 3 hours. EC2 took 14 hours to recover. Why? Because 100,000+ servers needed new leases simultaneously. The recovery system collapsed under its own load. They called it "congestive collapse." Your rollback strategy needs to handle the thundering herd problem. Can your system recover gracefully or will it choke on its own restart process? 🛡️ 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗮𝗽 𝗯𝗲𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 It took 50 minutes just to identify DNS as the culprit. In a company with world class observability. They had metrics. They had alerts. But connecting the dots during chaos is hard. How long would it take you to identify a DNS issue? Do you have runbooks for the weird stuff? 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗔𝗪𝗦 𝗱𝗶𝗱 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁: They published a brutally honest postmortem. No corporate speak. No hiding behind vague language. They admitted the automation had a latent defect. They shared exact timelines. They listed every affected service. The next outage is coming. For AWS. For your systems. For mine. The only question is whether we'll be ready. What's your plan?

  • View profile for HamidReza Madani

    Engineering Manager @Snapp! Food | Leading Scalable & Critical Systems | Team Leadership & System Design

    4,100 followers

    Hi 👋 🚀 Resiliency Engineering: Why Top Tech Companies Never Fail Their Users In today’s software landscape, failures are inevitable. What separates the giants like Netflix, Google, and Amazon from the rest is not that they avoid failures, but that they anticipate, measure, and recover from them. ⭐ What is Resiliency Engineering? It’s the practice of designing systems that continue to operate correctly even when parts of the system fail, and can recover quickly. 🟢 Real-world Usage: In microservices, if one service goes down, the rest keep running. In cloud systems, even if an entire data center fails, uptime is preserved. In e-commerce and fintech, payment failures or network issues are handled gracefully to ensure a seamless user experience. 🟠Key Techniques & Tools: Retry with Backoff Circuit Breakers Timeouts & Fallbacks Bulkhead Isolation Rate Limiting 🟣 Monitoring Resiliency: Measure what matters: Availability / Uptime Error Rate Latency / P95 / P99 MTTR (Mean Time To Recovery) MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) 🔵 Case Study: Netflix uses Chaos Engineering with tools like Chaos Monkey to intentionally fail services and test system resilience. Result? 99.99% uptime for millions of users worldwide. ⭕ Practical Steps to Improve Resiliency: 🔸Define SLOs & SLIs for every service 🔸Implement retry, timeout, circuit breaker, and fallback mechanisms 🔸Set up monitoring and observability (Prometheus, Grafana, OpenTelemetry) 🔸Run Chaos Engineering experiments 🔸Conduct blameless postmortems to learn and improve continuously Resiliency isn’t optional. It’s a competitive advantage. The question is: How resilient is your system today? #ResilienceEngineering #SRE #ChaosEngineering #Microservices #CloudNative #Reliability #Observability #SiteReliabilityEngineering #TechLeadership #HighAvailability

  • View profile for Shashidhar Reddy Erri

    Software Engineer @ JPMorgan Chase & Co. | AI, Copilot, Claude Code, Java,Spring Boot, React js, Redux,Javascript,Microservices, Cypress, Angular 12,Web-components,Typescript,

    4,737 followers

    I took down our Payment Service. Not with a bug, but with a Retry. I used to think "Resilience" meant "Trying again." If a service call fails, you catch the exception and retry. Simple. I had a Payment API that was acting slow. So, I wrapped it in a loop: Retry 3 times. Wait 1 second. I pushed the code. An hour later, the Payment Service didn't just slow down—it crashed completely. I had created a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack on my own system. The math is brutal. If the Payment Service is struggling (it's sick), and my API sees a timeout, it retries immediately. Now the service is handling the original traffic PLUS the retry traffic. It gets even sicker. So my API retries again. I was kicking a system that was already down. Imagine a cashier named Bob. Bob is overwhelmed. He is sweating, moving slow, and 50 people are yelling at him. My "Retry" logic was like a manager standing behind Bob yelling: "Hurry up! Do it again! Faster!" Does that help Bob? No. It stresses him out more. Eventually, Bob faints. I killed the worker by asking for too much. To fix it, I didn't need better retries. I needed a Circuit Breaker. In the physical world, if you plug too many heaters into one outlet, the fuse blows. It cuts the power instantly to prevent a fire. In software, we need the exact same switch. A Circuit Breaker has 3 simple modes (think of a Traffic Light): 1. Green Light (Closed) Traffic flows freely. We count the errors. As long as Bob is working fine, we keep sending customers. 2. Red Light (Open) If Bob starts failing (e.g., 50% errors), the breaker "Trips." It blocks all outgoing requests instantly. It tells the user "Service Down" without even bothering Bob. This gives him time to breathe and recover. 3. Yellow Light (Half-Open) This is the genius part. After waiting 30 seconds, the breaker lets ONE customer go to Bob. • If Bob serves them successfully? Switch to Green. (We are back in business!) • If Bob fails again? Switch back to Red. (He needs more rest). Retries are selfish. They say, "I want my data now." Circuit Breakers are empathetic. They say, "You are struggling. I will give you a break." Resilience isn't about never failing. It's about failing fast so you don't kill the system. #SystemDesign #Microservices #CircuitBreaker #Resilience #Architecture #Engineering

  • View profile for Jonathan Shroyer

    Gaming at iQor | Foresite Inventor | 3X Exit Founder, 20X Investor Return | Keynote Speaker, 100+ stages

    22,076 followers

    At some point, your CX will break. No matter how good your setup is, something will go wrong. What matters more is what happens next. Because recovery is where most companies either rebuild trust or lose it completely. Here’s what strong CX recovery looks like: 1. 𝐎𝐰𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐲.   Don’t wait for the customer to explain it 3 times. Acknowledge it first.     2. 𝐁𝐞 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐯𝐚𝐠𝐮𝐞.    “We’re sorry” is not a resolution. Tell them 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 happened and 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 you’re doing about it.     3. 𝐌𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲   Even a 24-hour delay feels like a lifetime when something’s broken. Let customers feel the speed.     4. 𝐆𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭.    This isn’t about throwing money at a problem. It’s about showing care. A well-timed gesture goes further than a coupon ever will.     5. 𝐅𝐢𝐱 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐭, 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭.    Use the failure to improve the system. Not just for one customer, but for every future one.     We’ve seen it over and over again at Quimbi: Clients don’t lose players because of one bad moment. They lose them when they handle that moment poorly. But if you get the recovery right? That one failure becomes the reason a customer stays.

  • View profile for Adam Knight

    Founder, Recreation Stays | Premium Property Management for Homes & Boutique Hotels

    3,786 followers

    If you only systematize one thing in your hospitality operation, make it service recovery. Not your check-in process. Not your cleaning protocol. Not your upsell strategy. Service recovery. Here's why: every other system is about what happens when things go right. Service recovery is about what happens when things go wrong. And things always go wrong. I don't care how good your operation is. Someone's going to show up and the WiFi's out, the AC isn't working, or the place isn't as clean as it should be. What separates great operators from everyone else isn't that problems don't happen. It's that they have a system for fixing them before the guest has to ask twice. Here's what I learned at St. Regis: A guest called the front desk at 11 PM. Their room was too cold and they couldn't figure out the thermostat. Within three minutes: an engineer was at the door. Within five: the problem was fixed. Within ten: a handwritten apology note and a bottle of wine were delivered to the room. The guest checked out two days later raving about the experience. Not because nothing went wrong. Because when something did, we had a system that made it right immediately. Here's the framework: ACKNOWLEDGE WITHIN 5 MINUTES. Doesn't matter if you can fix it yet. Let the guest know you've received their concern and you're on it. This alone defuses 80% of complaints before they escalate. EMPOWER YOUR TEAM TO FIX IT. If your team has to ask permission to comp a bottle of wine or move someone to a different room, you're too slow. Set clear parameters (dollar limits, decision authority) and let them act. FOLLOW UP AFTER IT'S RESOLVED. This is where most operators drop the ball. They fix the problem and move on. The best operators check back in: "We fixed the AC. Is everything comfortable now?" That follow-up turns a complaint into loyalty. Why this system first? Because service recovery has the highest ROI of any system you can build. A great check-in is nice. But a guest who had a problem and watched you fix it instantly? They become your most vocal advocates. Bad reviews don't come from problems. They come from problems that weren't handled well. And here's the thing: you can have the best property, the best amenities, the best pricing—but if you don't have a system for when things break, you're one bad weekend away from torching your reputation. Start here. Build this first. Everything else can wait. Great hospitality isn't about preventing every problem. It's about having the architecture to solve them before they matter.

  • View profile for Vishakha Sadhwani

    Sr. Solutions Architect at Nvidia | Ex-Google, AWS | 100k+ Linkedin | EB1-A Recipient | Follow to explore your career path in Cloud | DevOps | *Opinions.. my own*

    150,761 followers

    The AWS downtime this week shook more systems than expected - here’s what you can learn from this real-world case study. 1. Redundancy isn’t optional Even the most reliable platforms can face downtime. Distributing workloads across multiple AZs isn’t enough.. design for multi-region failover. 2. Visibility can’t be one-sided When any cloud provider goes dark, so do its dashboards. Use independent monitoring and alerting to stay informed when your provider can’t. 3. Recovery plans must be tested A document isn’t a disaster recovery strategy. Inject a little chaos ~ run failover drills and chaos tests before the real outage does it for you. 4. Dependencies amplify impact One failing service can ripple across everything. You must map critical dependencies and eliminate single points of failure early. These moments are a powerful reminder that reliability and disaster recovery aren’t checkboxes .. They’re habits built into every design decision.

  • View profile for B, Ravi

    Technical Lead DevOps - Zoom AI | Microsoft certified | Az-104 | Cloud Native, Kubernetes, and CI/CD Automation | Optimizing Cloud and On-Premise Environments

    2,145 followers

    DevOps & SRE Perspective: Lessons from the Amazon Web Services US-East-1 Outage ! 1. Outage context • AWS reported “increased error rates and latencies for multiple AWS Services in the US-EAST-1 Region,” later identifying issues around the Amazon DynamoDB API endpoint and DNS resolution as the likely root cause. • The region is a critical hub for many global workloads — meaning any failure has broad impact. • From the trenches: “Just got woken up to multiple pages. No services are loading in east-1, can’t see any of my resources. Getting alerts lambdas are failing, etc.” 2. What this means for SRE/DevOps teams • Single-region risk: Relying heavily on one region (or one availability zone) is a brittle strategy. Global services, control planes, identity/auth systems often converge here — so when it fails, the blast radius is massive. • DNS and foundational services matter: It’s not always the compute layer that fails first. DNS, global system endpoints, shared services (like DynamoDB, IAM) can be the weak link. • Cascading dependencies: A failure in one service can ripple through many others. E.g., if control-plane endpoints are impacted, your fail-over mechanisms may not even activate. • Recovery ≠ full resolution: Even after the main fault is resolved, backlogs, latencies, and unknown state issues persist. Teams need to monitor until steady state is confirmed. 3. Practical take-aways & actions •Adopt a multi-region / multi-AZ fallback strategy: Ensure critical workloads can shift automatically (or manually) to secondary regions or providers. •Architect global state & control plane resilience: Make sure services like IAM, identity auth, configuration, and global databases don’t concentrate in one point of failure. •Simulate DNS failures and control-plane failures in chaos testing: Practice what happens when DNS fails, when endpoint resolution slows, when the control plane is unreachable. •Improve monitoring + alerting on “meta-services”: Don’t just monitor your app metrics—watch DNS latency/resolve errors, endpoint access times, control-plane API errors. •Communicate clearly during incidents: Transparency and frequent updates matter. Teams downstream depend on accurate context. •Expect eventual consistency & backlog states post-recovery: After the main fix, watch for delayed processing, stuck queues, prolonged latencies, and reconcile state when needed. 4. Final thought This outage is a stark reminder: being cloud-native doesn’t eliminate infrastructure risk — it changes its shape. As practitioners in DevOps and SRE, our job isn’t just to prevent failure (impossible) but to anticipate, survive, and recover effectively. Let’s use this as an impetus to elevate our game, architect with failure in mind, and build systems that fail gracefully. #DevOps #SRE #CloudReliability #AWS #Outage #IncidentManagement #Resilience

  • View profile for Hagay Lupesko

    Senior Vice President, AI Inference @ Cerebras Systems

    16,191 followers

    🚨 Lessons from the AWS us-east-1 outage on Oct 19 🚨 A single low-level DNS automation bug in DynamoDB propagated into a massive multi-service, region-wide failure lasting over 14 hours. So much is built on AWS that for a while it seemed as if the entire internet was down... Some interesting details from AWS’s postmortem 👇 🧩 Root cause: A race condition in DynamoDB’s DNS automation deleted its own regional endpoint. Damn! ⚡ Mitigation: AWS engineers identified and fixed the root cause in just over 2 hours. That's impressive, given AWS's scale. Kudos to the AWS on-calls! 🏗️ AWS runs on AWS: The DynamoDB failure cascaded to EC2, NLB, Lambda, Redshift, ECS, EKS, SQS, and many other services. It’s amazing to see how deep the rabbit hole goes and how much AWS is built on top of AWS! 🤖 Automation paradox: The very automation meant to speed recovery caused a “congestive collapse” in EC2’s recovery workflow. It was only resolved once human on-calls intervened to manually throttle and clear queues. There’s still hope for humanity! 🙌 💭 The bigger lesson: Service outages, in particular at hyper scale, are inevitable. If something can fail, it will fail - good old Murphy's law! So how do you protect against the next cloud outage? ✅ Redundancy: Architect your service for multi-region resiliency. Active-active or active-passive failover, pick your poison. If your service is not architected this way, you're vulnerable! ⚙️ Detection & mitigation: Real-time metrics, fast alerts, and a world-class on-call culture are all key. Having all of that is what enabled AWS to detect and fix the root cause within hours. 📚 Learning from failures: AWS’s postmortem is a masterclass in rigorous incident analysis, and it was powered by Amazon's notorious Correction of Errors (CoE) process. Every engineering org should have such process in place. This is how you ensure continuous improvements!

  • View profile for Kartikey Kumar Srivastava

    Sr. Software Engineer at Meta | Previously at Google, Microsoft, Amazon | Sharing my reflections on software engineering and Career growth...

    76,809 followers

    Back in late 2021, while I was working at Amazon, a teammate accidentally broke production in a way that still gives me chills. It started with a single, overlooked bug, a small config error in a backend service that, under normal circumstances, would’ve gone unnoticed. But as luck would have it, a routine deployment in another team triggered this exact code path thousands of times. Within minutes, our service began to fail across multiple regions. Orders got delayed, error rates spiked, and our dashboards were filled with red. I’ll never forget the look on my colleague’s face when we traced the root cause to his last commit. His hands were shaking. For a moment, he looked ready to disappear. But here’s what happened next and why I still respect him deeply. He owned up immediately. He jumped on Slack, pinged our leadership, and flagged the issue in our war room call. He kept his explanation simple, took responsibility, and asked for help. Our team quickly split into action: – Engineering started working on a rollback and patch. – Product and customer success teams drafted communication to impacted partners. – Leadership kept all stakeholders in the loop with real-time updates. While the whole team was on edge, my colleague kept his cool, worked on a fix, and personally tested it in a staging environment. Once validated, he stayed up to supervise the hotfix rollout across every affected region. Within 24 hours, we were back to normal. Here’s what I learned from watching him that night: 1.⁠ ⁠Don’t Run From Your Mistakes: The fastest way to recover trust is to own the problem and face it head-on. 2.⁠ ⁠Communication Beats Perfection: Proactive, honest updates keep panic down and teams focused. 3.⁠ ⁠Teams Win Together, Lose Together: No one pointed fingers. Everyone showed up. That’s real culture. 4.⁠ ⁠Every Crisis Is a Lesson: We did a detailed postmortem, fixed our processes, and grew stronger as a team. Everyone makes mistakes. What matters is how you respond, own it, fix it, and learn from it. If you’ve ever broken production (or been close), you know that feeling. But trust me, how you handle it will shape your entire career. What’s your “I broke prod” story? And what did you learn?

  • View profile for Dipak Shekokar

    20k+ @Linkedin | AWS DevOps Engineer | AWS | Terraform | Kubernetes | Linux | GitLab | Git | Docker | Jenkins | Python | AWS Certified ×1

    24,620 followers

    In one of my recent interviews, the hiring manager asked me: "Suppose you’ve deployed a new version of your application on AWS ECS (Elastic Container Service), and suddenly, half of your services are crashing. How would you handle this?" For a moment, I paused. Not because I didn’t know the answer— But because I remembered a real incident that happened to me during a late-night deployment. 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐈 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝: • "First, I’d check the ECS Service Events. Did the new containers fail to start? Maybe a misconfigured task definition caused it—like wrong environment variables, incorrect image tag, or resource limits." • "Then, I’d inspect CloudWatch logs for the container. Maybe it’s a code issue or the application can’t connect to a database because the secret is missing." • "Next, I’d look at the health checks. If ECS is failing health checks, it automatically stops the task. Maybe the new version changed an endpoint path or added authentication that the old health check wasn’t expecting." • "Finally, if needed, I’d rollback by updating the service with the last known stable task definition revision. ECS keeps track of versions, so rollback is just a few clicks—or a single CLI command." 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝: "This is the kind of mindset we want—someone who doesn’t just think about deployments but thinks about how to recover from failures." Tools fail. Deployments break. That’s normal. What makes you valuable is how calmly and quickly you find a solution. Let’s keep learning from these scenarios, whether in interviews or real life.

Explore categories