#github
"GitHub seems unable to keep up with the massive increase in infra load from agents. One software engineer built a clever website called “Claude’s Code” that tracks Claude Code bot contributions across GitHub. Growth in the past three months has been enormous".
I think GitHub and similar platforms will need to add limits to current plans and introduce higher-priced tiers for AI bots.
link to the "Does GitHub still merit “top git platform for AI-native development” status?" post of The Pragmatic Engineer - in my comment
GitHub was built for 10 engineers pushing 100 commits a week. Your AI agents don't care about that constraint.
We've watched teams hit API rate limits before their morning standup.
We've watched latency kill agent feedback loops mid-task - the agent is waiting on a response while context evaporates.
We've watched the world's most important developer platform strain under a workload it was never designed for.
GitHub is remarkable software but it was designed for humans.
The gap between "designed for humans" and "works for agents" is enormous:
→ Rate limits tuned for human hands, not automated pipelines
→ CI latency acceptable for a dev refreshing a PR, catastrophic for an agent mid-loop
→ Review interfaces built for human eyes, not machine-readable output
→ No native concept of agent identity or trust
The infra layer for the agentic era isn't GitHub with a better API wrapper.
It's a new primitive. Built from scratch. For machines.
Guess what? That's what we're building with @Mesa.
I built a project to solve a simple problem.
My GitHub was not as active as it should be, even though I was consistently solving problems on LeetCode.
So I created LeetCode Sync
A fully automated system that syncs my accepted LeetCode solutions to GitHub without any manual effort.
Here’s how it works
Every 30 minutes, a GitHub Actions workflow runs and does the following
• Fetches my latest accepted submissions using LeetCode’s GraphQL endpoints
• Extracts the full source code
• Formats each file with problem number, title, and language
• Pushes everything directly to my GitHub repository
While building this, I faced a major challenge:
LeetCode does not provide a public API
I used GraphQL, but it requires a session cookie for authentication
The issue is that this session expires frequently and normally needs to be updated manually
To solve this, I used Playwright
• Automatically launches a headless browser
• Logs into LeetCode
• Fetches a fresh session cookie
• Updates it securely in GitHub Secrets
• Continues the workflow without any manual intervention
I also added a deduplication system
• Tracks already processed submissions
• Ensures the same solution is never pushed twice
Tech stack used
• Node.js
• GitHub Actions
• GraphQL
• Playwright
This started as a small fix for my inactive GitHub, but turned into a complete automation system combining CI CD, browser automation, and API handling
If you are solving problems regularly but not pushing them to GitHub, this kind of automation can help you stay consistent
#leetcode#github#automation#nodejs#developers
Understanding GitHub is no longer optional—it’s a core skill for modern developers.
Here’s a simple workflow professionals follow daily:
• Create a repository
• Clone it locally
• Make changes to code
• Commit with meaningful messages
• Push updates to GitHub
• Collaborate via pull requests
📌 Mastering this process improves both productivity and teamwork in tech environments.
🌐 www.skillversed.com
📩 support@skillversed.com
Are you using GitHub effectively in your workflow?
#GitHub#SoftwareEngineering#DeveloperTools#TechCareers#CodingSkills#ProfessionalGrowth#skillversed
Something unexpected I had to do recently...
GitHub has been flaky for a few weeks. Short outages, actions stuck in queue... Just unreliable enough to waste your afternoon.
The worst part is the first 30 minutes where you're sure it's you. You rewrite the command. Check your git config. Re-auth. Wonder if you broke something earlier. Then you finally open status.github.com and see a red screaming banner 🤦♂️.
Looks like AI coding has quietly pushed up the load on all of these tools. More code, shipped faster, through the same few providers - GitHub, Vercel, OpenAI, Anthropic. Incidents happen more often, and they eat more of your day when they do.
I set up notifications for Claude a while back and it felt natural. You expect an AI API to have hiccups. But a GitHub status alert? I wouldn't have guessed I'd need one a year ago.
That's why we had to integrate more status updates with Slack recently at LowCode Agency to stay up to day with these outages.
GitHub has experienced a surge in instability due to a combination of unprecedented traffic growth, driven largely by AI-generated code, and complex infrastructure migrations.
2025 Commits: 1 billion
2026 Commits: 14 billion projected (275 million/week)
Yeah, AI is having an impact on software development...
> GitHub stopped updating its own status page due to terrible availability ... 90.1% uptime - This means ... issues/degradations for 2.5 hours daily ...
> GitHub struggles to keep up with the increase in load from AI agents generating more code and pull requests ... Claude Code bot contributions growth in the past 3 months has been enormous ... Stream of outages ...
https://lnkd.in/eYHzasTh
GitHub's latest GitHub Copilot advancements have changed the game. We're no longer just writing boilerplate; we're generating complex, production-ready logic in real-time. The real question isn't *if* AI will write the code, but *how fast* we can audit, validate, and architect the emergent complexity it produces. Are your CI/CD pipelines ready to handle this velocity, or are you building brittle solutions for yesterday's assumptions? Stop accepting incremental productivity gains and start engineering resilience aga AI-generated ability.
What are your strategies for verifying the integrity of AI-generated codebases?
#GitHub#Copilot#AIinSoftwareDevelopment#DeveloperLife
Typed “guthib” instead of GitHub today… and landed somewhere I definitely didn’t expect. 😄
It’s funny how in tech, even a single misplaced letter can completely change the outcome—whether it’s a search, a command, or a line of code.
Moments like these are small, but they reinforce an important habit:
being mindful of the details. Because in our field, precision isn’t optional—it’s everything.
Sometimes the best reminders don’t come from big failures, but from tiny slips like this.
Back to typing carefully… one character at a time.
#DeveloperLife#CodingLessons#AttentionToDetail#TechJourney#GitHub
In a significant shift for the developer community, GitHub has announced a pause on new sign-ups for its Copilot Pro plans, along with tightened usage limits. This move signals a pivotal change in how AI-assisted coding tools are accessed and utilized, moving away from a model of unlimited support at fixed prices.
As companies increasingly rely on AI to enhance productivity, this decision prompts a reevaluation of cost structures associated with such technologies. By recalibrating its offerings, GitHub is not only addressing operational challenges but also setting a new precedent for the sustainability of AI services in a competitive market. This development may encourage organizations to explore alternative solutions or even develop in-house capabilities, ultimately reshaping the landscape of AI in software development. The implications of this decision extend beyond GitHub, as other tech firms may follow suit, leading to a more nuanced discussion around the value, accessibility, and pricing of AI tools across the industry.
https://lnkd.in/dmwMtMx3#GitHub#CopilotPro#AIassistance#technews
https://newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com/p/does-github-still-merit-top-git-platform