🚀 Day 13 – Why We Don’t Create Threads Manually in Real Applications Earlier, I used to create threads like this: Thread t = new Thread(() -> { System.out.println("Task running"); }); t.start(); 👉 Works fine… but not ideal for real-world applications. --- 💡 Better approach: ExecutorService ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(2); executor.submit(() -> { System.out.println("Task executed by thread pool"); }); executor.shutdown(); --- 👉 Why use "ExecutorService"? ✔ Manages a pool of threads (no need to create/destroy repeatedly) ✔ Improves performance and resource utilization ✔ Provides better control (shutdown, scheduling, etc.) --- ⚠️ Insight: Creating too many threads manually can: - Consume more memory - Reduce performance - Make debugging difficult 💡 Real takeaway: In production systems, we focus on managing tasks, not threads directly. #Java #BackendDevelopment #Multithreading #ExecutorService #LearningInPublic
Why ExecutorService Improves Java Multithreading
More Relevant Posts
-
Have you ever debugged a production issue where logs show the same error everywhere… but you still can’t figure out what actually failed? I used to make this mistake a lot — catch exception → log error → throw again Service logs Repository logs Controller logs Same exception 3–4 times. Just noise. Then I changed one simple thing: don’t log where you’re just throwing the exception. Now I follow this: Service/Repository → just throw or wrap the exception Log only once at the boundary (API / consumer) Always add context We often don’t pay much attention to logging, but it plays a crucial role when debugging a system. You need clarity on where to log, what to log, and where not to. Now instead of messy logs, I get one clear error log with full context. Debugging feels less like guessing and more like tracing a story. Less logs. Better logs. That’s the real strategy. #BackendDevelopment #Microservices #SystemDesign #Java #SpringBoot #Logging #SoftwareEngineering #CleanCode
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
99% Efficiency: Mastering Merge Sort on Linked Lists Sorting a Linked List efficiently is a rite of passage for every software engineer. Unlike arrays, we don't have random access, which makes algorithms like Merge Sort the gold standard for achieving O(nlog n) time complexity. Today, I successfully tackled LeetCode #148 (Sort List) with a solution that outperformed 99.18% of Java users. The Technical Breakdown: 1. The "Divide" Phase (Tortoise & Hare): I used the Slow and Fast pointer approach to find the midpoint. By setting fast = head.next, I ensured the slow pointer stopped at the exact spot needed to split the list cleanly into two halves. 2. The "Conquer" Phase (Recursion): By recursively calling sortList, I broke the problem down until I reached the base case of a single node. 3. The "Combine" Phase (Optimized Merge): The magic happens in the merge function. By using a Dummy Node (new ListNode(-1)), I avoided complex if-else checks for the head of the sorted list, allowing for a seamless stitch-up of the two sorted halves. Consistency in the small logic leads to success in the big architecture. Onward! 🔗💻 #DSA #LeetCode #Java #MergeSort #SoftwareEngineering #CodingJourney #ProgrammingLogic #Optimization
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
#Day21 🧠 Multithreading Design Patterns — thinking beyond threads Multithreading isn’t just about creating threads — it’s about designing systems 💡 Some key patterns I explored today: 👉 Producer–Consumer → task queues 👉 Thread Pool → reuse threads 👉 CompletableFuture → async pipelines 👉 ThreadLocal → per-thread data 👉 Immutable objects → thread safety Example 👇 ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(3); executor.submit(() -> System.out.println("Task running")); 💡 Choosing the right pattern makes your system scalable and safe #Java #Multithreading #DesignPatterns #Concurrency #JavaDeveloper #SystemDesign #InterviewPreparation #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Day 7 – Exception Handling: More Than Just try-catch Today I focused on how exception handling should be used in real applications—not just syntax. try { int result = 10 / 0; } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println("Error occurred"); } This works… but is it the right approach? 🤔 👉 Catching generic "Exception" is usually a bad practice 💡 Better approach: ✔ Catch specific exceptions (like "ArithmeticException") ✔ Helps in debugging and handling issues more precisely ⚠️ Another insight: Avoid using exceptions for normal flow control Example: if (value != null) { value.process(); } 👉 is better than relying on exceptions 💡 Key takeaway: - Exceptions are for unexpected scenarios, not regular logic - Proper handling improves readability, debugging, and reliability Small changes here can make a big difference in production code. #Java #BackendDevelopment #ExceptionHandling #CleanCode #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🔥 Day 61/100 — #100DaysDSAChallenge Today I worked on a classic problem: Implement Queue using Stacks. 💡 The key idea We use two stacks: 1. One stack for input (push operations) 2. One stack for output (pop/peek operations) When we need to remove an element: If the output stack is empty, we move all elements from input stack to output stack This reverses the order Now the oldest element is on top and ready to be removed ⚙️ Complexity ⏱️ Amortized Time: O(1) 💾 Space: O(n) 🧠 What I learned today Today’s lesson was about reversing data flow to achieve a different behavior. #Java #DSA #Stack #Queue #LeetCode #ConsistencyCurve
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I sat in a debugging session where the question was embarrassingly simple: did the dependency recover, or did we serve fallback? We had retries, a timeout, a fallback path and the dashboard said: clean success. It took two engineers and forty minutes of log tracing to figure out that "clean success" meant the fallback had been serving cached responses for twenty minutes while upstream recovered. That is the composition problem. Once timeout, retry, fallback, and breaker checks all live in the same part of the request path, the code becomes harder to reason about than the failure itself. Structured concurrency gives you a cleaner boundary: keep the request lifecycle separate from the policies around it. So those policies can be tested, logged, and reviewed independently. The rule I keep coming back to: if a policy changes what the caller sees, it should be visible in the code and visible in the metrics. #Java #StructuredConcurrency #ProjectLoom #BackendEngineering #DistributedSystems
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Day 51/100 – LeetCode Challenge Problem: Third Maximum Number Today I solved the “Third Maximum Number” problem, which focuses on identifying the third distinct maximum value in an array. The key challenge here was handling duplicates while keeping track of the top three distinct values. Instead of sorting the array directly, I used a set to eliminate duplicates first. This simplified the problem by ensuring that only unique values were considered. From there, I handled two cases. If there were fewer than three distinct numbers, I returned the maximum. Otherwise, I iterated through the set and tracked the top three maximum values using variables, updating them as I encountered larger numbers. This approach avoids unnecessary sorting and keeps the logic efficient and controlled. The solution runs in O(n) time with O(n) space complexity due to the set. This problem reinforced the importance of handling duplicates carefully and thinking about edge cases before jumping into implementation. Fifty-one days in. The focus is now on writing cleaner logic with fewer assumptions. #100DaysOfLeetCode #Java #DSA #Arrays #ProblemSolving #Consistency
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Race Condition : happens when multiple threads access and modify shared data at the same time, and the final result depends on the timing of execution. example: int count = 0; public void increment() { count++; } two threads execute count++ simultaneously: Both read count = 0 Both increment to 1 Both write back 1 Final result = 1 instead of 2 Problem: Data inconsistency Unpredictable results Solution: Use synchronization (synchronized) Use locks (ReentrantLock) Use atomic classes (AtomicInteger) Thread Starvation : thread is “waiting forever” while others keep running. example: Thread t1 = new Thread(task); t1.setPriority(Thread.MAX_PRIORITY); Thread t2 = new Thread(task); t2.setPriority(Thread.MIN_PRIORITY); t2 may rarely or never execute. problem: Some threads never complete Solution: ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock(true); #Java #BackendDevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #MultiThreading #Concurrency #JavaPerformance #CodingTips #Programming #SystemDesign
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Day 16 of #100DaysOfCode Today’s problem: Minimum Absolute Difference 📊 🔍 Problem Understanding: Given an array of distinct integers, find all pairs with the minimum absolute difference. 🧠 Approach: First, I sorted the array Then compared adjacent elements (since minimum difference will always be between neighbors in sorted order) Tracked the minimum difference and stored all valid pairs 👉 Key Insight: Sorting reduces unnecessary comparisons and simplifies the problem ⚙️ Concepts Used: Sorting (Arrays.sort) Greedy observation (check only neighbors) List handling for storing pairs 📊 Complexity: ⏱️ Time Complexity: O(N log N) (due to sorting) 💾 Space Complexity: O(N) (for storing result pairs) 📚 Key Learnings: Learned how sorting simplifies problems Understood how to reduce complexity from brute force O(N²) → O(N log N) Improved thinking in terms of patterns and optimization 💯 Result: ✔️ Accepted (All test cases passed) ✔️ Runtime: 1 ms (100%) 🔥 ✔️ Clean and efficient solution Sometimes the best optimization is just sorting + observation 💡 Let’s keep building consistency 🚀 #Day16 #100DaysOfCode #Java #DSA #LeetCode #ProblemSolving #Sorting
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I thought the validation was solid… until real users started clicking faster than expected. Recently, while working on a form flow, everything looked fine during testing. - Inputs were validated. - Responses were clean. - Flow worked as expected. Then a real scenario exposed an edge case: Some users clicked the submit button twice during slow network moments. Result? Duplicate records were created. That reminded me that validation isn’t only about checking fields. It’s also about handling user behavior, timing, retries, and unexpected usage patterns. I improved the flow with request locking / idempotent handling and better button state management. Much more reliable after that. Sometimes users don’t break systems intentionally, they just use them in real ways we didn’t simulate. Build for expected inputs. Test for real behavior. #Java #BackendDevelopment #Validation #SystemDesign #SpringBoot #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development