I thought the validation was solid… until real users started clicking faster than expected. Recently, while working on a form flow, everything looked fine during testing. - Inputs were validated. - Responses were clean. - Flow worked as expected. Then a real scenario exposed an edge case: Some users clicked the submit button twice during slow network moments. Result? Duplicate records were created. That reminded me that validation isn’t only about checking fields. It’s also about handling user behavior, timing, retries, and unexpected usage patterns. I improved the flow with request locking / idempotent handling and better button state management. Much more reliable after that. Sometimes users don’t break systems intentionally, they just use them in real ways we didn’t simulate. Build for expected inputs. Test for real behavior. #Java #BackendDevelopment #Validation #SystemDesign #SpringBoot #LearningInPublic
Validation Isn't Just About Fields, It's About User Behavior
More Relevant Posts
-
🐞 Debuggability should be treated as a design requirement. One thing I’ve come to value more over time is this, A system that is hard to debug is hard to own. A lot of teams think about debugging only after something breaks in production. But by then, the real design question has already been answered. If the system does not expose enough context, failure clarity, and traceability, engineers end up doing what they should not have to do during an incident, For me, debuggability is not just about “having logs.” It is about designing systems so that when something goes wrong, we can actually understand • where it failed • why it failed • how far the request got • what state the system is in • what impact it is causing • what can be done next That usually means things like: • Meaningful logs, • Correlation IDs, • Clear status transitions, • Useful error messages, • Visibility across async flows, • Enough context to trace behavior across components. Because in real systems, symptoms and causes are often far apart. The error may appear in one place, while the real issue started much earlier in another service, queue, dependency, or state transition. That is why I think debuggability is a design concern, not just a support concern. A system that works is valuable. A system that can explain itself under pressure is even better. #SoftwareEngineering #SystemDesign #BackendEngineering #ProductionEngineering #Java #SpringBoot
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
“Why is our test suite so slow?” I’ve heard this question in every team I’ve joined. And the answer is almost never “because we have too many tests”. It’s usually: • A test spinning up a full database for a single assertion • A 500-line integration test pretending to be a unit test • A random 'Thread.sleep(5000)' someone added “just to be safe” • A Spring context that takes longer to load than the actual feature • Tests that could run in parallel but don’t The good news? Speeding up tests is one of the highest-ROI engineering tasks you can do. Mock more. Slice more. Parallelize more. Sleep less. Your future self (and your CI pipeline) will thank you. #Java #SpringBoot #BackendEngineering #SoftwareHumor #DevelopersLife #ProgrammingFun
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 Day 7 – Exception Handling: More Than Just try-catch Today I focused on how exception handling should be used in real applications—not just syntax. try { int result = 10 / 0; } catch (Exception e) { System.out.println("Error occurred"); } This works… but is it the right approach? 🤔 👉 Catching generic "Exception" is usually a bad practice 💡 Better approach: ✔ Catch specific exceptions (like "ArithmeticException") ✔ Helps in debugging and handling issues more precisely ⚠️ Another insight: Avoid using exceptions for normal flow control Example: if (value != null) { value.process(); } 👉 is better than relying on exceptions 💡 Key takeaway: - Exceptions are for unexpected scenarios, not regular logic - Proper handling improves readability, debugging, and reliability Small changes here can make a big difference in production code. #Java #BackendDevelopment #ExceptionHandling #CleanCode #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Hot take: most performance issues I've seen weren't bugs. They were violations of the Single Responsibility Principle wearing a disguise. Stay with me... When one class does 5 things, it holds 5 things in memory, initializes 5 dependencies, and forces 5 code paths through every request (even when you only needed 1). A few real patterns I've watched play out: - A "UserService" that also handled notifications, audit logging, and report generation. Every login loaded an email client it didn't need. - A controller doing validation, transformation, AND orchestration. Impossible to cache any layer independently. - One giant "helper" class everyone imported; dragging 40 unrelated dependencies into every test and every startup. The fixes weren't fancy. Split the class. Extract an interface. Apply Dependency Inversion so high-level code doesn't drag low-level baggage around. Classic SRP and DIP. Result? Faster startup. Lower memory footprint. Smaller deployable units. Tests that run in seconds instead of minutes. SOLID gets dismissed as 'academic.' But every principle has a performance story hiding underneath. Clean code isn't just for humans. Your runtime reads it too ;) #Java #SpringBoot #SOLID #SoftwareEngineering #BackendDevelopment #designPatterns #systemDesign
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Have you ever debugged a production issue where logs show the same error everywhere… but you still can’t figure out what actually failed? I used to make this mistake a lot — catch exception → log error → throw again Service logs Repository logs Controller logs Same exception 3–4 times. Just noise. Then I changed one simple thing: don’t log where you’re just throwing the exception. Now I follow this: Service/Repository → just throw or wrap the exception Log only once at the boundary (API / consumer) Always add context We often don’t pay much attention to logging, but it plays a crucial role when debugging a system. You need clarity on where to log, what to log, and where not to. Now instead of messy logs, I get one clear error log with full context. Debugging feels less like guessing and more like tracing a story. Less logs. Better logs. That’s the real strategy. #BackendDevelopment #Microservices #SystemDesign #Java #SpringBoot #Logging #SoftwareEngineering #CleanCode
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Internal Working of IOC (Inversion of Control) in Spring. Understanding how Spring manages your application behind the scenes 👇 📌 Step-by-Step Flow: 1️⃣ Configuration Loading → Spring reads config (@Component, @Bean, etc.) 2️⃣ Bean Definition → Classes are identified & metadata is created 3️⃣ IOC Container → ApplicationContext initializes 4️⃣ Bean Creation → Objects created by Spring (no "new") 5️⃣ Dependency Injection → Dependencies injected (@Autowired) 6️⃣ Initialization → Init methods called (@PostConstruct) 7️⃣ Ready to Use → Bean is fully configured ✅ 8️⃣ Lifecycle Management → Create → Use → Destroy 9️⃣ Destruction → Cleanup (@PreDestroy) 💡 In Short: Spring handles object creation & dependencies, you focus only on business logic! ✨ IOC = Less effort, more control #Java #SpringBoot #SpringFramework #IOC #DependencyInjection #BackendDevelopment #Coding #InterviewPreparation
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 Day 13 – Why We Don’t Create Threads Manually in Real Applications Earlier, I used to create threads like this: Thread t = new Thread(() -> { System.out.println("Task running"); }); t.start(); 👉 Works fine… but not ideal for real-world applications. --- 💡 Better approach: ExecutorService ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(2); executor.submit(() -> { System.out.println("Task executed by thread pool"); }); executor.shutdown(); --- 👉 Why use "ExecutorService"? ✔ Manages a pool of threads (no need to create/destroy repeatedly) ✔ Improves performance and resource utilization ✔ Provides better control (shutdown, scheduling, etc.) --- ⚠️ Insight: Creating too many threads manually can: - Consume more memory - Reduce performance - Make debugging difficult 💡 Real takeaway: In production systems, we focus on managing tasks, not threads directly. #Java #BackendDevelopment #Multithreading #ExecutorService #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I sat in a debugging session where the question was embarrassingly simple: did the dependency recover, or did we serve fallback? We had retries, a timeout, a fallback path and the dashboard said: clean success. It took two engineers and forty minutes of log tracing to figure out that "clean success" meant the fallback had been serving cached responses for twenty minutes while upstream recovered. That is the composition problem. Once timeout, retry, fallback, and breaker checks all live in the same part of the request path, the code becomes harder to reason about than the failure itself. Structured concurrency gives you a cleaner boundary: keep the request lifecycle separate from the policies around it. So those policies can be tested, logged, and reviewed independently. The rule I keep coming back to: if a policy changes what the caller sees, it should be visible in the code and visible in the metrics. #Java #StructuredConcurrency #ProjectLoom #BackendEngineering #DistributedSystems
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
𝗜𝗻 𝗝𝗮𝘃𝗮, 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗠𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱 𝗦𝗶𝘇𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗮 𝗟𝗼𝘁 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗟𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱𝘀 𝗼𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹. Just one more condition. One more validation. One more call. And suddenly, a 10-line method becomes 100+ lines. The problem is not length alone. 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱𝘀 𝗵𝗶𝗱𝗲: • mixed responsibilities • unclear flow • hard-to-test logic • hidden side effects 𝗜𝗻 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗝𝗮𝘃𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲, 𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗱𝘀 𝘂𝘀𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆: ✔ do one thing ✔ have a clear name ✔ are easy to scan ✔ are easy to test Short methods are not about style. They are about clarity and control. When a method grows too much, it’s often a signal — not a success. What’s the longest method you’ve seen in a real project? #Java #CleanCode #SoftwareEngineering #BackendDevelopment #JavaDeveloper
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Day 569 of #750DaysOfCode 🚀 🔍 Problem Solved: Minimize Hamming Distance After Swap Operations Today’s problem was a great reminder that not every swapping problem is about brute force — sometimes it’s about understanding connections. 💡 Key Insight: The given swaps form connected components (groups of indices). Within each component, we can rearrange elements freely. So instead of thinking about swaps individually, we: 👉 Treat each component as a bucket of values 👉 Try to match target values using available values in that bucket 🧠 Approach: Use Union-Find (DSU) to group indices Store frequency of values from source for each component Traverse target: If value exists in the same component → match it Else → count as mismatch ⚡ Complexity: Time: ~O(n) (thanks to path compression in DSU) Space: O(n) ✨ Takeaway: When swaps are allowed → think connected components When matching values → think frequency maps This combination shows up in many advanced problems — mastering it is a big win 💪 #LeetCode #DSA #Java #UnionFind #CodingJourney #ProblemSolving #Tech #LearningEveryday
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development