LeetCode Challenge: Backspace String Constraints

🚀 LeetCode Daily Challenge 🔗 Problem: https://lnkd.in/gdWsKciF This solution finds the maximum distance between two houses of different colors based on a key observation: the maximum distance will always involve either the first house or the last house. Instead of checking all possible pairs, which would take O(n²), the code improves the method by making a single pass through the array. It starts with an answer of 0 and goes through each index `i`. For each house, it does two checks. First, it compares the current color with the color of the first house (index 0). If they are different, the distance between them is simply `i`, and we update the maximum distance. This identifies the farthest house from the start that has a different color. Next, it compares the current color with the color of the last house (index n-1). If they are different, the distance is `(n - 1 - i)`, and we update the maximum if necessary. This identifies the farthest house from the end that has a different color. By doing this, the algorithm effectively captures the maximum possible distance without checking every pair. Since it requires only one loop through the array, the time complexity is O(n) and the space complexity is O(1). 👉 My Solution: https://lnkd.in/gg_5J_DF If you found this breakdown helpful, feel free to ⭐ the repo or connect with me on LinkedIn 🙂🚀 #️⃣ #leetcode #cpp #dsa #coding #problemsolving #engineering #BDRM #BackendDevWithRahulMaheswari

🚀 LeetCode Daily Challenge 🔗 Problem: https://lnkd.in/g9SGp2Qa 💡 My thought process: First, create a mapping from each value to a sorted list of its indices using a map<int, vector<int>>. This allows for easy lookup of all positions where a value occurs. For each query index idx, it retrieves the corresponding value num. If that value appears only once, the result is -1 because no valid pair exists. In case of multiple occurrences, we use binary search on the index list of num: * upper_bound finds the next occurrence that is strictly greater than idx. * lower_bound locates the current position and checks the previous occurrence. It calculates distances in both directions: * Forward distance: either direct (next - idx) or circular wrap (n - (idx - first)). * Backward distance: either direct (idx - prev) or circular wrap (n - (last - idx)). The minimum of these distances is stored as the answer. 👉 My Solution: https://lnkd.in/gjmKVa3y If you found this breakdown helpful, feel free to ⭐ the repo or connect with me on LinkedIn 🙂🚀 #️⃣ #leetcode #cpp #dsa #coding #problemsolving #engineering #BDRM #BackendDevWithRahulMaheswari

🚀 LeetCode Daily Challenge 🔗 Problem: https://lnkd.in/g8Xgd5wx The function goes through each word in the `queries` array. For every query word, it compares it with each word in the `dictionary`. Since all words are assumed to have the same length, it performs a character-by-character comparison. For each pair of words, a counter called `unequal` tracks how many positions have different characters. The code loops through each index of the word and increases this counter whenever the characters at the same position do not match. If the number of differing characters is 2 or less at any point, it means the query word can change into that dictionary word with at most two edits. In this case, the query word is added to the result list, and the inner loop stops early, using `break` to avoid unnecessary comparisons with other dictionary words. Finally, after checking all query words, the function returns the list of valid words that meet the condition. 👉 My Solution: https://lnkd.in/gMnYvSvx If you found this breakdown helpful, feel free to ⭐ the repo or connect with me on LinkedIn 🙂🚀 #️⃣ #leetcode #cpp #dsa #coding #problemsolving #engineering #BDRM #BackendDevWithRahulMaheswari

Today I solved the “Single Number” problem on LeetCode 💻 🔹 Problem Statement:Given an array where every element appears twice except one, the task is to find that single element. 🔹 Approach Used:I solved this problem using the Bit Manipulation (XOR) technique.XOR has some important properties: a ⊕ a = 0 a ⊕ 0 = a So, when we take XOR of all elements in the array, the duplicate elements cancel out, leaving only the unique element 🔹 Code Idea:Iterate through the array and keep XOR-ing each element with a variable. The final value will be the answer. 🔹 Time Complexity: O(n)🔹 Space Complexity: O(1) 🚀 Key Takeaways: XOR-based problems are very common in coding interviews Optimized solutions are always better than brute-force approaches Understanding bit manipulation can greatly improve problem-solving skills Consistency is the key 🔥#LeetCode #DSA #CodingJourney #ProblemSolving # coding challenge🚀🚀

🚀 Day 27/50 – LeetCode Challenge 🧩 Problem: Count and Say Today’s problem focused on generating a sequence based on reading and describing the previous term, which is a great exercise in string manipulation and pattern building. 📌 Problem Summary: The “Count and Say” sequence is defined as: Start with "1" Each next term is formed by reading the previous term aloud Example: 1 → "one 1" → 11 11 → "two 1s" → 21 21 → "one 2, one 1" → 1211 1211 → "one 1, one 2, two 1s" → 111221 🔍 Approach Used ✔ Started from the base case "1" ✔ Iterated to build each next term ✔ Counted consecutive digits ✔ Formed the new string using: count + digit ✔ Repeated until reaching the required n ⏱ Time Complexity: O(n × m) 📦 Space Complexity: O(m) 💡 Key Learning ✔ Understanding pattern generation problems ✔ Working with string grouping and counting ✔ Building results step by step ✔ Improving attention to detail in iteration This problem shows how simple rules can create complex patterns. Consistency is the key to mastery 🚀 🔗 Problem Link: https://lnkd.in/g_cMVP5a #50DaysOfLeetCode #LeetCode #DSA #Strings #ProblemSolving #CodingJourney #FutureAIEngineer #Consistency

🚀 LeetCode Daily Challenge 🔗 Problem: https://lnkd.in/gdjyFXCw First, we note that swaps aren't random; they are only allowed between specific index pairs. If index `a` can swap with `b`, and `b` can swap with `c`, then `a`, `b`, and `c` become connected. We can rearrange values freely among them. This means we need to identify groups of indices where swapping is allowed within the group. To find these groups efficiently, we use Disjoint Set Union (DSU). Each index starts in its own set. For every allowed swap pair `[x, y]`, we combine their sets. After processing all the swaps, indices that share the same parent belong to the same connected component or group. Next, we organize all indices by their DSU parent. Each group shows a set of positions where we can rearrange values without restrictions. For each group, we aim to match values from `source` to `target` as closely as possible: * First, we count how often each value appears in `source` for that group. * Then, we go through the same indices in `target`. For each value:  * If the value exists in our frequency map (meaning we have it in `source`), we use it and decrease its count.  * If it doesn't exist, it means we can't match this value in the group, contributing to the Hamming distance. By doing this for all groups, we maximize matches within each connected component, which minimizes the overall Hamming distance. 👉 My Solution: https://lnkd.in/gfx3iMut If you found this breakdown helpful, feel free to ⭐ the repo or connect with me on LinkedIn 🙂🚀 #️⃣ #leetcode #cpp #dsa #coding #problemsolving #engineering #BDRM #BackendDevWithRahulMaheswari

🚀 LeetCode Daily Challenge 🔗 Problem: https://lnkd.in/gZ52pSZR 💡 My thought process: The solution operates in two separate passes: 1. Left-to-Right Pass: For each element at index "i", calculate the distance to all previous occurrences of that value. If a value has appeared "k" times before, the sum of distances is found using this formula: (count * current_index) - (sum of previous_indices). By storing the count and the running sum of indices in a hash map, we can compute this in constant time. 2. Right-to-Left Pass: The same logic is applied in reverse to calculate the distance from the current index to all future occurrences. In this case, the formula changes to: (sum of future_indices) - (count * current_index). By adding the results from both directions, the code captures the total absolute difference for every identical pair without the performance cost of a nested loop. 👉 My Solution: https://lnkd.in/gfEc7Kis If you found this breakdown helpful, feel free to ⭐ the repo or connect with me on LinkedIn 🙂🚀 #️⃣ #leetcode #cpp #dsa #coding #problemsolving #engineering

Day 22/128 of my LeetCode journey 🚀 Solved Longest Common Prefix today — a simple-looking problem that really highlights the importance of string manipulation and careful comparisons. 💡 Key takeaway: Instead of comparing every string fully, I learned how to progressively shrink a candidate prefix until it matches all strings. It’s a great example of optimizing by eliminating unnecessary checks early. 🔍 What I practiced: String traversal and comparison Iterative problem-solving (refining the prefix step by step) Writing clean and efficient logic Every problem might not be complex, but each one strengthens the fundamentals — and that’s what builds strong problem-solving skills. #LeetCode #DSA #CodingJourney #128DaysOfCode #SoftwareEngineering #ProblemSolving

LeetCode Day 18 : Problem 392 (Is Subsequence) Just solved another LeetCode problem. It was "Is Subsequence", sounds like a string problem, right? But here's what I actually learned: A subsequence doesn't need to be contiguous. "ace" is a subsequence of "abcde" because the characters appear in the same order, even with other characters in between. That single insight shapes the entire solution. The approach is clean two pointer. One pointer walks through s, one walks through t. Only move the s pointer when characters match. Always move the t pointer. If the s pointer reaches the end, every character in s was found in order inside t. No nested loops, no extra space, no complex logic. Just two pointers, one condition, done. This is what a clean O(n) solution looks like when you fully understand the problem before writing code. Twenty three problems in. The two pointer pattern keeps rewarding you. Once you see it, you stop reaching for nested loops entirely. The real lesson? Understanding the problem deeply always leads to a simpler solution. Complexity in code is usually a sign of confusion in thinking. #DSA #LeetCode #JavaScript #CodingJourney #Programming

I just returned false on a LeetCode problem… and it passed ALL 67 test cases. No loops. No base conversions. No palindrome checks. Just one line: return false; And it got accepted instantly. The problem? 2396.  Strictly Palindromic Number You had to check if a number n is a palindrome in every base from 2 to n-2. Sounds brutal, right? Then I actually read the problem properly. Here's the mind-blowing part: For any n ≥ 4, when you convert it to base (n-2), it always becomes "12". n=5 → base 3 → "12" n=6 → base 4 → "12" n=10 → base 8 → "12" "12" is never a palindrome. So it's mathematically impossible for any number ≥ 4 to be strictly palindromic. For n=1,2,3 the base range is invalid anyway. The answer is always false. The entire "hard" problem collapses into a single line of code. Lesson for every developer: Before you write clever code, ask yourself: Is this problem even possible? Sometimes the best solution isn’t optimized algorithms. It’s pure elimination.  O(1) thinking. Read the problem. Really read it. #LeetCode #ProblemSolving #SoftwareEngineering #Coding #DSA #BackendEngineering #CodingInterview #DeveloperMindset #CleanCode