𝗜 𝗹𝗲𝘁 𝗚𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶 𝘄𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗺𝘆 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗵𝗼𝗼𝗸𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝘆 𝗯𝗮𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝗯𝗶𝘁𝘀. Seriously, I thought I was pretty decent at crafting custom hooks, but handing the reins to an AI was a humbling experience. It's like a coding mirror, reflecting back all the shortcuts and inefficiencies I'd accumulated. Here's what Gemini called me out on: • 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿-𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗻 `𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗰𝘁`: I was shoehorning too much logic into `useEffect` when a more focused hook or even just local state would have been cleaner. • 𝗨𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘁𝘆: Gemini often found simpler, more declarative ways to achieve the same results I'd painstakingly built with more verbose code. • 𝗟𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗼𝗳 𝗿𝗲𝘂𝘀𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆: Some hooks were so specific to one component that they were practically useless elsewhere. The AI was much better at identifying common patterns. • 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗹: My attempts at managing asynchronous operations within hooks sometimes led to messy, nested callbacks. Gemini's output was consistently flatter. It wasn't about Gemini being "smarter," but about its ability to process patterns and best practices without human biases or ingrained habits. It forces you to re-evaluate your own approach and strive for more elegant solutions. This is a powerful tool for learning and code review. Save this post if you're looking to level up your React hook game. Follow for more honest tech thoughts and practical dev advice. #ReactJS #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #Coding #Developer
React Hook Review with Gemini
More Relevant Posts
-
Forget what you heard, Claude is quietly eating Gemini's lunch when it comes to writing React hooks. I've been putting both AI models through their paces on complex hook logic, and the difference is stark. Claude consistently delivers cleaner, more idiomatic, and frankly, *better* React code. Here's why I'm leaning heavily on Claude for this specific task: ● Contextual Understanding: Claude seems to grasp the nuances of React's lifecycle and state management better, leading to hooks that are less prone to common pitfalls. ● Idiomatic Code: The generated hooks feel like they were written by a seasoned React developer – using patterns and conventions I’d expect. ● Reduced Boilerplate: Claude often finds more concise ways to express the same logic, saving me time and reducing cognitive load. This isn't about declaring one AI "better" overall, but for crafting robust, efficient React hooks, Claude is currently outperforming. It's genuinely changing how I approach certain coding challenges. Save this if you're looking to level up your React hook game with AI assistance. Follow for more practical dev insights. #React #AIDevelopment #JavaScript #Frontend
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
AI can write JavaScript for you. But it won’t save you when it breaks in production. Saw a great post from @JavaScript that reminded me of this. You can pick it up quickly. Build a UI. Call an API. Ship something. And nowadays, AI can even help you get there faster. But that’s just the beginning. The gap shows up when things get real: • async flows interacting across components and services • race conditions that only appear under real usage • state behaving differently than expected • bugs that “work locally” but fail in production Closures. Event loop. Async behavior. Not just concepts, they shape how your system behaves. That’s where the difference is: 👉 Writing JavaScript vs 👉 Understanding JavaScript And that gap? That’s where developers grow... or plateau. Curious — what concept made JavaScript “click” for you? #javascript #softwareengineering #webdevelopment #learning #coding
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Forget "hallucinations," Claude 3.5 Sonnet's real game-changer is its uncanny ability to decipher my gloriously chaotic React code. Seriously, I threw some of my messiest, most "oh god, what was I thinking?" components at it, and it didn't just *parse* the code; it seemed to grasp the *why* behind it. Here’s what I've seen: * It correctly infers the intended state management logic, even when I've used half-baked patterns. * It flags potential bugs by understanding the *goal* of a component, not just its syntax. * Refactoring suggestions feel less like generic advice and more like understanding the underlying business requirement. This isn't just about spitting out code; it’s about AI finally getting the *intent* buried beneath layers of developer-induced entropy. It’s like having a junior dev who’s actually read all the docs and doesn’t get easily confused. This changes how we can collaborate with AI on complex frontend projects. It feels like a true partnership is finally within reach. Save this if you're tired of AI tools missing the point in your code. Follow for more unfiltered thoughts on AI and development. #AIinDev #ReactJS #LLMs #SoftwareDevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I've been vibe coding with Claude for months now. And I kept making the same mistake. Every time I asked it to build a frontend, it would put everything in one file. HTML, CSS, JavaScript... all in one place. It works. Until it doesn't. You come back the next day, ask Claude to change one thing, and it starts breaking stuff. The file is 500 lines. The AI loses track of what's where. It overwrites CSS you already fixed. Moves JavaScript to the wrong spot. I blamed Claude for a while. Then I realized... I never told it to organize the code. So now my first message always includes something like: "Separate files. index.html, style.css, app.js." One line. That's all it takes. Since I started doing this, Claude actually keeps track of the project. Edits the right file. Doesn't touch what it shouldn't. Honestly I wish someone told me this 3 months ago. Would've saved me so many headaches. What's your go-to trick when coding with AI? 👇 #VibeCoding #AI #BuildingWithAI #ClaudeAI #NoCode
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
“Great developers don’t write long functions; they write composable, reusable, and predictable ones.” In JavaScript, the difference between average and exceptional code isn’t about how much you write; it’s about how well your pieces fit together. AI works best when you are extremely clear. AI rewards clarity. Example (Clarity) - Same ask; but CLEAR -> Write a JS function -> Write a pure JS function that takes an (user input) and returns (desired result) after applying (necessary logic) With AI, you can literally generate entire functions, modules. But here’s the hard truth. Knowledge is no longer just about writing code. It’s about understanding code. Because: • If you don’t understand what AI generated; you can’t debug it. • If you can’t debug it; you can’t own it. • If you can’t own it; it is of no use. Copy-paste coding might give you speed today; but it will cost you growth tomorrow. The real skill now: Not “Can you code?” But “Do you understand what’s happening (the code)?” Because in the age of AI: Writing code is easy Thinking like an engineer is rare And that’s what will set us apart. #JavaScript #AI #Coding #Growth
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
“Turn text into React components using AI 🔥” What if you could generate React components just by describing them? 🤯 I built a project that converts text prompts into UI components using AI. 💡 Features: 🔸Generate React components from simple prompts 🔸Live preview for basic UI 🔸Clean code output for complex components 🔸Loading & error handling implemented 🛠️ Tech Stack: React.js, JavaScript, Vite, AI API ⚠️ Note: Due to free API limitations, usage may be restricted after a few requests. 🔗 Live Demo: https://lnkd.in/da3vrB4A 💻 GitHub Repo: https://lnkd.in/dSqy-WSu 💬 Try prompts like: “Loading spinner”, “Login form”, “Card UI” Would love your feedback! #React #WebDevelopment #AI #Frontend #JavaScript #Projects #Learning
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I used to spend hours on Full-stack TypeScript with tRPC — end-to-end type safety tasks. Then I tried vibe coding — letting AI handle the scaffolding while I focused on design. Result: 3x faster prototyping, same code quality. The workflow: 1. Describe the architecture in plain English 2. AI generates the boilerplate 3. I review, refactor, and optimize 4. Ship in days instead of weeks The developers who will thrive in the next 5 years aren't the ones who type the fastest. They're the ones who think the clearest. Have you tried AI-assisted development? What was your experience? #WebDevelopment #TypeScript #Frontend #JavaScript
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
⚡ JavaScript Event Loop I’ve been seeing a lot of “AI can write your code” conversations lately. And honestly, it’s true to some extent. You can build UI faster. You can generate functions. You can even debug basic issues. But recently I hit something that reminded me where AI stops helping. An async issue. Something wasn’t executing in the order I expected. No errors. No warnings. Just, wrong behaviour. And this is where most people get stuck. Because this isn’t about syntax. It’s about how JavaScript actually works under the hood. What helped me understand it better: 👉JS runs synchronous code first (Call Stack) 👉Async callbacks don’t run immediately 👉They go into queues: ✔️ Microtasks → Promises, async/await ✔️ Macrotasks → setTimeout, setInterval 👉And the key detail: ✔️ Microtasks always run before macrotasks This code snippet explains a lot: console.log("start"); setTimeout(() => console.log("timeout"), 0); Promise.resolve().then(() => console.log("promise")); console.log("end"); Output: start end promise timeout This is the kind of thing that: 👍 breaks assumptions 👍 causes subtle bugs 👍 wastes hours if you don’t know what’s happening 🫱 My takeaway AI is great for speeding things up. But when behaviour gets tricky, you fall back on fundamentals like this. For frontend, this is one of those basics that pays off again and again. Have you ever been confused by this execution order? Planning to share more like this as I revisit core concepts. 🙌 Credits This visual is inspired by content from Dev.to and Lydia Hallie’s excellent explanations.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Feelings of writing your own code is like treating your own baby. developer fight for it. AI cannot replace that feeling. inner voice of developer. #developer #js #AI
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Nowadays, a lot of new developers don’t want to climb step by step… They learn a little HTML, CSS, JavaScript …and then try to jump straight to AI 😄 Meanwhile, the stairs in between are still there: React, Backend, DSA, problem-solving, system thinking AI is powerful, no doubt. But without fundamentals, it’s easy to build things without really understanding what’s happening under the hood. The real growth still comes from learning the basics properly, building projects, solving problems, and understanding how software actually works. Use AI as a tool, not as a shortcut to skip the foundation. That’s the difference between just generating code and actually becoming a developer. #WebDevelopment #SoftwareDeveloper #FrontendDeveloper #BackendDeveloper #AI #JavaScript #ReactJS #DSA #CodingJourney #DeveloperMindset #TechCareers #Programming
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore related topics
- Benefits of Gemini's Context Window
- Understanding Gemini AI Models
- Gemini 1.5 Pro Developer Insights
- Tips for AI-Assisted Programming
- How to Overcome AI-Driven Coding Challenges
- How Developers can Use AI in the Terminal
- How to Use AI Instead of Traditional Coding Skills
- How to Use AI to Make Software Development Accessible
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development