🚀 Java 21 Concurrency Experiment: Virtual Threads vs Traditional Approaches I built a small lab to compare different concurrency strategies in Java under a mixed workload. Technologies tested: • ExecutorService (Fixed thread pools) • CompletableFuture • Parallel Streams • Virtual Threads (Java 21) The goal was simple: measure execution time, throughput, and memory usage while processing concurrent tasks. Some interesting observations: ⚡ Virtual Threads handled thousands of tasks with significantly higher throughput ⚡ Traditional thread pools performed well but required careful sizing ⚡ CompletableFuture and Parallel Streams were easier to use but less predictable under heavier loads In one of the mixed workload scenarios: Virtual Threads reached 16k+ ops/s, significantly outperforming the other approaches. This experiment reinforced something important: Concurrency model choice can dramatically impact system scalability. Code + experiment details: https://lnkd.in/dYeyu4Pd #Java #Java21 #BackendEngineering #Concurrency #Performance #SoftwareEngineering

For those interested in the technical details, the benchmark includes: • 45 different benchmark runs • 3 workload types (I/O, CPU, Mixed) • Multiple concurrency strategies You can also run quick demos using the included scripts. Happy to hear feedback from other engineers experimenting with Java 21 concurrency.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories