😎Today, I finally understood why interviewers keep asking about Shallow Copy vs Deep Copy 🤯 Earlier in my career, this question always felt frustrating and purely theoretical 📚 But recently, while working with an API response in a React application ⚛️, the answer became very real. Here’s what I was doing 👇 🔹 Calling an API 🔹 Storing the response in state 🔹 Modifying that data later And suddenly… the UI wasn’t updating as expected 😐 That’s when it clicked 💡 ❌ The problem wasn’t React ✅ The problem was how JavaScript handles object references ⚠️ What I learned: • A shallow copy still points to the same nested object reference • Mutating it doesn’t create a new reference • React doesn’t detect a change → ❌ no re-render Understanding deep vs shallow copy isn’t about interviews — it’s about writing predictable, bug-free state updates 🧠✨ This experience completely changed how I view “basic” interview questions. They’re not always about theory. They’re often about real production bugs 🐞🔥 📌 Lesson learned: If you don’t respect immutability, React won’t respect your state updates. #JavaScript #React #FrontendDevelopment #WebDevelopment #ReactJS #StateManagement #Immutability #SoftwareEngineering #CodingLife #DevLearning #LearningInPublic #InterviewPrep #DeveloperExperience
I think there are some syntax error. 1. You have created a array by cloning old data using spread operator, but while logging you have ignored to use index point to target the object data. Another thing to remember that spread operator copies only the first level that means if you do some thing like this Const a =[1,2,3] Const copy =[...a] Copy[0] = 'a' It will replace first index data of copy variable only without effecting the original
Very informative!
Concepts like shallow vs deep copy feel theoretical until you hit a real React state bug. Understanding object references and immutability is critical for predictable UI updates and clean state management.
Superb. Binita Mahto Dweep Solanki
JSON.stringify() and then JSON.parse() ❌ structuredClone() ✅