I finally understood why interviewers ask “Shallow Copy vs Deep Copy.” Not in an interview. Not in theory. But while debugging a React bug. I was: Updating API data in state Changing nested values Everything looked correct… but the UI didn’t update 🤯 Spent ~2 hours debugging. Then it clicked 💡 The problem wasn’t React. It was JavaScript object references. Shallow copy → same nested reference Same reference → no state change No state change → no re-render That’s it. This question isn’t “basic.” It’s a preview of real production bugs. Lesson learned: If you don’t respect immutability, React won’t respect your state updates. #ReactJS #JavaScript #FrontendDevelopment #ShallowCopy #DeepCopy #Immutability #BugFixing #DeveloperLife #LearningByDoing
Silly me. I thought "shallow" vs "deep" referred to how we were supposed to copy-paste AI generated stuff. One learns something new every day.
Yes when same reference is there then state will not change as a result no update. So when ever there is different reference so state change and react will automatically update the state. Thats why shallow copy is used to make different reference in RTK slice reducer actions to update the state
We’ve all been there—staring at a `console.log` that says the data changed, while the UI just stares back blankly. It’s exactly why `[...spread]` isn’t always the silver bullet people think it is when dealing with nested objects.
DHARM SinghAs a developer, we better understand concepts when we see that in our development cycle - like - Shallow Copy vs Deep Copy difference. Thanks for sharing the meaningfull insights. Important key point for all JS developers
DHARM Singh I’ve experienced this too —shallow vs deep copy bugs don’t crash, they silently ruin your state.
Curious to know , how many of you faced this bug in React? 👇