🚀 DSA Deep Dive – Day 30 Solved Longest Increasing Subsequence today. And I realized… Dynamic Programming is not about continuous subarrays. It’s about controlled choices over time. 🤯 The problem sounds simple: Given an array, find the length of the longest strictly increasing subsequence. Not subarray. Subsequence. That one word changes everything. 👀 You’re allowed to skip elements. But you must maintain order. Here’s what I learned 👇 • Define dp[i] = length of LIS ending at index i • Every element can start a subsequence (minimum length = 1) • For every i, check all j < i • If nums[j] < nums[i] → extend subsequence • Take the maximum possible extension This is classic DP state building. At every index, you ask: 👉 Can I extend a previous increasing chain? 👉 Or do I start fresh from here? Brute force recursion: Exponential 💀 Optimized DP (nested loops): O(n²) ⚡ Even better approach exists: O(n log n) with binary search 🚀 But the mindset is what matters. The powerful shift? Instead of asking “What is the longest sequence overall?” Ask “What is the longest sequence ending HERE?” That’s dynamic programming thinking. Local decisions → Global answer. Lesson: DP is not about memorizing patterns. It’s about defining the right state. Once the state is clear, the transition becomes obvious. 30 days in. Graphs ✅ 1-D DP almost done 🚀 Consistency compounds. Follow for more DSA breakdowns 🔥 #LeetCode #DSA #DynamicProgramming #InterviewPrep #CodingJourney #ProblemSolving #100DaysOfCode #SoftwareEngineering #TechGrowth
Dynamic Programming for Longest Increasing Subsequence
More Relevant Posts
-
🚀 DSA Deep Dive – Day 32 Solved Longest Common Subsequence today. And I realized… Dynamic Programming is not about matching characters. It’s about managing choices between two paths. 🤯 The problem looks simple: Given two strings, find the length of their longest common subsequence. Not substring. Subsequence. That means you can skip characters — but order must remain the same. 👀 Here’s what I learned 👇 • Define dp[i][j] = LCS length till text1[0..i-1] and text2[0..j-1] • If characters match → extend previous answer • If they don’t match → take max of two possibilities • Either skip from first string • Or skip from second string This is pure decision-based DP. At every cell, you decide: 👉 If text1[i-1] == text2[j-1] → 1 + dp[i-1][j-1] 👉 Else → max(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1]) Every state depends on smaller prefixes. Brute force recursion: Exponential 💀 Optimized DP: O(n × m) time ⚡ Space optimized possible 🚀 The powerful shift? Instead of asking “What is the longest common sequence overall?” Ask “What is the answer for these two prefixes?” Small answers build the big one. That’s dynamic programming. Lesson: When two strings are involved, DP is usually hiding behind prefixes. Define the right state. Trust the transitions. Build step by step. 2-D DP getting stronger 💪 Consistency continues. Follow for more DSA breakdowns 🚀 #LeetCode #DSA #DynamicProgramming #InterviewPrep #CodingJourney #ProblemSolving #100DaysOfCode #SoftwareEngineering #TechGrowth
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝟒 🚀 𝐌𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐃𝐲𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐜 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 – 𝐋𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐔𝐩 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐋𝐈𝐒 (𝐁𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐒𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡) Today was not just another DSA practice day… it was a breakthrough moment 💡 I dived deep into one of the most classic problems in Dynamic Programming — Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) — and unlocked its optimal solution using Binary Search 🔥 💭 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐝𝐞𝐚 Initially, LIS feels like a pure DP problem: 👉 “For every element, check all previous elements.” But this leads to O(n²) complexity… So the question was: Can we do better? Yes. And that’s where the magic begins ✨ ⚡ 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡 (𝐁𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐒𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡 𝐎𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧) Instead of storing actual subsequences, we maintain a temporary array (tails): ✔️ tails[i] → smallest possible ending value of an increasing subsequence of length i+1 For every number: Use Binary Search to find its correct position in tails Replace or extend accordingly 🧠 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐤𝐬 We are not building the full subsequence… We are building a structure that guarantees the length of LIS 👉 Smaller tail = more chances to extend the sequence 👉 Binary Search = faster decisions ⏱️ 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐔𝐩𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞 From: ❌ O(n²) → brute DP To: ✅ O(n log n) → optimized brilliance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Start solving at least ONE DSA question a day. Not 50 in one weekend. Not random problems from everywhere. Just one question. Every day. Because consistency beats intensity in DSA preparation. But here’s the mistake many people make. They solve random problems without a clear roadmap. Arrays today. Graphs tomorrow. Dynamic Programming next week. And after months, it still feels like nothing is clicking. That’s why a structured roadmap like this 8-week DSA plan is extremely helpful. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0} Instead of guessing what to study next, it organizes the most important topics week by week. Week 1 starts with Arrays and Basic Hashing. You learn patterns like: • Prefix Sum • Two Pointers • Sliding Window • HashMap based problems With classic questions like: • Two Sum • Kadane’s Algorithm • Subarray Sum Equals K • Product of Array Except Self :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1} Week 2 moves to Sorting and Searching. Here you practice: • Binary Search • Search space problems • Rotated array problems • Kth largest element patterns :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2} Week 3 focuses on Strings. You practice patterns like: • Sliding Window • HashMap counting • Palindromes and anagrams With problems like: • Longest Substring Without Repeating Characters • Group Anagrams • Minimum Window Substring :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3} Then comes Linked Lists, where you learn: • Fast and slow pointers • Reversal techniques • Cycle detection • Merging linked lists :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4} And the later weeks cover important interview topics like: • Stack and Queue • Trees and BST • Recursion and Backtracking • Dynamic Programming • Graph basics like BFS, DFS, and Topological Sort :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5} This is the kind of structure that makes DSA preparation much easier. Instead of solving hundreds of random questions, you follow patterns step by step. Save this roadmap so you can follow it week by week. #dsa
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Recursion is one of those concepts that feels confusing at first… until it suddenly clicks—and then you start seeing it ..... everywhere. Almost every important problem-solving domain builds on recursion: • Dynamic Programming (DP) → starts with recursion, then optimizes it • Trees → inherently recursive structures (left subtree, right subtree) • Graphs → DFS is just recursion in action • Backtracking → recursion + decision making + undo At its core, recursion is just: 👉 breaking a problem into smaller versions of itself 👉 trusting that the smaller piece will work correctly Once you truly understand: • base cases • recursive calls • stack behavior …a lot of “hard” topics become much easier to approach. Instead of memorizing patterns, you start thinking in structure. If you’re struggling with DSA or problem solving, don’t skip recursion. Build a strong foundation here, and everything else—DP, graphs, trees—starts to feel like a natural extension rather than a new topic. Master recursion once, benefit everywhere. Rahul Maheshwari
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
DSA Starts Making Sense When You Learn It Pattern-Wise Many developers approach DSA by jumping between random problems. The result? Progress often feels slow and inconsistent. Effective DSA preparation comes from recognizing that most problems are built around repeating patterns. Once you understand the pattern behind a problem, solving similar questions becomes significantly easier. A Practical Preparation Strategy- • Identify core DSA patterns • Focus on mastering one pattern at a time • Solve multiple problems that follow the same logic • Move to the next pattern only after gaining confidence Fundamental DSA Patterns Every Learner Should Know 1) Sliding Window 2) Two Pointers 3) Hashing & Frequency Map 4) Prefix Sum 5) Binary Search (on array & answer) 6) Recursion & Backtracking 7) Linked List Patterns 8) Stack & Monotonic Stack 9) Heap / Priority Queue 10) Greedy 11) Dynamic Programming 12) Graph Traversal (BFS / DFS) 13) Tree Traversal 14) Bit Manipulation When you prepare DSA pattern-wise: ✔ Problem recognition becomes faster. ✔ Solutions become more structured and confident. ✔ Learning shifts from memorization to understanding. Strong DSA skills are rarely about volume. They come from mastering foundational patterns. 📌 Save this as a structured DSA preparation roadmap. hashtag #DSA #CodingInterview #Python #PlacementPreparation #LeetCode #PatternBasedDSA #PythonDeveloper #SoftwareEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Most people think programming is hard because of syntax. Missing colons. Indentation. Weird errors. That’s not the real difficulty. The real difficulty is translating logic that feels obvious in your head into instructions that leave zero room for interpretation. In your mind, logic is flexible. You can skip steps. Assume context. Say “obviously” or “it should handle that case.” A computer can’t. Before writing code, you must decide: • What happens first • What happens if something is missing • What “large,” “small,” or “enough” actually mean • What happens when two conditions are true at the same time That structure is logic. Code is the formal translation of that structure. Programming is the moment where thinking stops being forgiving. Syntax errors are loud and honest. But the harder part is when the code runs and you realize something you assumed was never actually defined. From logic to code isn’t a typing problem. It’s a precision problem. What assumption have you caught yourself making in code recently? Day 20 / 30 #30DaysOfDataScience #ProgrammingThinking #DataWork #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
DSA became much easier the day I stopped coding first. Instead, I started solving problems on paper. Day 34 of my Daily Engineering Practice. Today I worked on Top K Frequent Elements, and something interesting happened. Earlier this week I struggled for days on Group Anagrams. But today the problem felt much simpler. The difference wasn't the difficulty. The difference was the process. I tried a structured 5-step problem-solving framework. Here’s the approach that worked for me: 1️⃣ Understand the Problem Write down: • Inputs • Outputs • Constraints • Edge cases Constraints often hint at the correct data structure. 2️⃣ Start With the Brute Force Describe the simplest possible solution. First in plain English. Then convert it into pseudocode. 3️⃣ Look for Optimization Once brute force is clear, ask: Can a better data structure reduce time complexity? 4️⃣ Dry Run the Logic Take a sample input and simulate the algorithm step-by-step. This step catches many logical mistakes before coding. 5️⃣ Only Then Write the Code What I realized today: DSA becomes much less intimidating when you follow a repeatable thinking process. Sometimes the biggest improvement isn’t a new algorithm. It’s a better way of thinking about problems. Curious to hear from others learning algorithms: Do you follow a structured framework when solving problems? #DSA #Algorithms #LeetCode #SoftwareEngineering #ProblemSolving #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Understanding Time & Space Complexity in DSA As developers, writing code that works is important — but writing code that scales efficiently is even more important. 📊 Time Complexity measures how fast an algorithm runs as input size increases. 💾 Space Complexity measures how much memory an algorithm uses. Key insight from the Big-O chart: O(1) < O(log n) < O(n) < O(n log n) < O(n²) < O(2ⁿ) < O(n!) ✅ The closer your algorithm is to O(1) or O(log n), the more efficient it is. 💡 Example: Using HashMaps can give O(1) lookups Nested loops usually lead to O(n²) Divide-and-conquer algorithms like Merge Sort achieve O(n log n) Understanding these concepts helps in: • Writing optimized code • Building scalable systems • Cracking coding interviews 📚 Keep practicing DSA — optimization is what separates good developers from great ones. #DSA #Algorithms #TimeComplexity #SpaceComplexity #BigO #Programming #SoftwareEngineering #CodingInterview
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 DSA Deep Dive – Day 36 Solved Interleaving String today. And I realized… Dynamic Programming is not about combining strings. It’s about validating paths. 🤯 The problem looks simple: Given 3 strings s1, s2, s3 Check if s3 is formed by interleaving s1 and s2. Sounds like string matching… 👀 But it’s actually a 2D decision problem. Here’s what I learned 👇 • Total length must match: 👉 s1.length + s2.length == s3.length • Define dp[i][j] = Can we form s3[0…i+j-1] using: 👉 s1[0…i-1] and s2[0…j-1] • Two choices at every step: 👉 Take character from s1 👉 Take character from s2 Transitions: • If s1[i-1] == s3[i+j-1] → check dp[i-1][j] • If s2[j-1] == s3[i+j-1] → check dp[i][j-1] If any is true → dp[i][j] = true ✅ Brute force recursion: Exponential 💀 Optimized DP: O(n × m) ⚡ Space optimized possible 🚀 The powerful shift? Instead of asking “Can I build s3 completely?” Ask “Can I reach THIS position using prefixes of s1 and s2?” Step-by-step validation → final answer. Lesson: Many string problems are actually DP grid problems. Think in terms of positions. Think in terms of choices. That’s where clarity comes. DP intuition leveling up 💪 Consistency continues. Follow for more DSA breakdowns 🚀 #LeetCode #DSA #DynamicProgramming #InterviewPrep #CodingJourney #ProblemSolving #100DaysOfCode #SoftwareEngineering #TechGrowth
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I used to think Dynamic Programming was just about memorizing patterns like “take or not take”… until I saw it in real life. Recently, I was working on a problem where I had multiple choices at every step, and each choice affected future outcomes. At first, I tried exploring all possibilities (pure recursion). It worked… but the time complexity exploded. Then I noticed something: 👉 I was solving the same subproblems again and again. That’s when I shifted my approach: Stored results of smaller subproblems (memoization) Built the solution step-by-step (tabulation) Avoided recomputation completely 💡 Result: From exponential → linear time And the real realization hit me: This is exactly how real systems work. Think about it: Route optimization (Google Maps) Resource allocation Stock profit decisions All of them are about: 👉 “Making the best decision now, based on past computations” 🚀 Lesson I learned: DP is not just a coding trick. It’s a way of breaking complex decisions into reusable intelligence. Once you start seeing overlapping subproblems in real life, you can’t unsee them. #DynamicProgramming #DSA #Coding #ProblemSolving #Tech #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
Explore related topics
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development