Longitudinal Studies on Training Impact

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Longitudinal studies on training impact are research projects that follow people over an extended period to understand how training programs influence skills, job performance, and well-being in real-world settings. These studies provide valuable evidence showing how specific training methods—from workplace courses to cognitive and strength training—can produce lasting benefits far beyond the initial learning phase.

  • Track progress: Use regular check-ins and assessments to measure how training influences performance and retention over time.
  • Focus on real-world outcomes: Evaluate not just test results, but broader impacts like job satisfaction, confidence, health, and career advancement.
  • Support ongoing learning: Create environments that encourage people to apply and reflect on their training, helping gains last and grow into meaningful improvements.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Joao Santos

    Expert in education and training policy

    31,685 followers

    🎯 Key highlights of a study from the Economics of Education Review that looks at how continuous work-related training impacts people's careers in Switzerland🇨🇭. 📘 The research is important because it uses detailed government data on both education and employment over several years to get a very clear picture of the effects. It helps us understand if training truly leads to better job outcomes and who benefits the most, especially in a country with a lot of adult training but little government regulation. 🔍 Purpose & Relevance: - Investigates how CET impacts earnings and unemployment risk. - Uses Swiss data, where adult education is largely privately organized—offering insights relevant to liberal labour markets like those in Anglo-Saxon countries. - Highly relevant for policymakers, employers, and VET practitioners seeking evidence-based strategies to upskill the workforce. 🎯 Key Themes & Takeaways: 💼 Labour Market Outcomes of CET: - CET increases annual earnings by 3.4% on average. - Reduces unemployment risk by 2.1 percentage points—nearly halving the baseline rate. - Shortens unemployment spells by up to 0.17 months. 📊 Methodology Strength: - Uses regression-adjusted matched difference-in-differences with entropy balancing. - Controls for selection bias and pre-treatment trends—enhancing causal credibility. 👥 Effect Heterogeneity: - Strongest earnings gains for low-income workers (8.1% in the lowest tercile). - Unemployment risk reduction most pronounced among high-income earners. - Vocationally trained workers benefit from both higher earnings and lower unemployment—highlighting VET’s dual dividend. 🎓 VET & Skills Focus: - Vocational education emerges as a key driver of CET effectiveness. - Even short, non-formal courses (avg. 48 hours) yield measurable returns. - Employer-financed training (78% of cases) plays a pivotal role—suggesting firms recognize CET’s productivity value. 📉 Limitations & Cautions: - Effects may be understated due to conditioning on pre-treatment income. - Results may not generalize to state-funded or highly regulated labour markets. - Non-work-related training shows negligible labour market impact—reinforcing the importance of vocational intent. 🧠 Final Thought: This study reinforces the strategic value of VET and CET in modern labour markets. It’s not just about formal qualifications—targeted, work-related training can be a powerful lever for economic mobility and resilience. #LifelongLearning #VocationalTraining #SkillsDevelopment #AdultEducation Stefan Denzler Jens Ruhose Stefan Wolter EfVET European Association of Institutes for Vocational Training (EVBB) European Vocational Training Association - EVTA EURASHE eucen EUproVET EU Employment and Skills Cedefop European Training Foundation WorldSkills International OECD Education and Skills SEPIE - Servicio Español para la Internacionalización de la Educación International Labour Organization IEFP - Instituto do Emprego e Formação Profissional

  • View profile for Jackson Fyfe, PhD

    I talk about exercise, ageing, and healthspan | Senior Lecturer in Exercise Science at Deakin University | 15+ years in exercise research and education

    10,565 followers

    How strong could you get from just one 20-minute strength session per week? A massive 7-year analysis provides some insight. This great study from James Steele and colleagues modelled data from 14,960 people (average age 48, SD 11) who completed “minimal-dose” strength training once per week for up to 352 weeks (~6.8 years). The program was highly standardised and incredibly simple: ▪️ One (supervised) session ▪️ Six machine-based exercises ▪️ One set (4–6 reps) to momentary muscular failure ▪️ 10 seconds lifting, 10 seconds lowering (each set lasted ~80–120 seconds) As for total time in the gym? Always under 20 minutes. Despite being so brief, the strength gains were substantial. Participants improved their strength by 30–50% in the first year, before plateauing at around 50–60% above baseline six years later. Strength improved fast, then levelled off as expected. But here’s the part we often forget: When it comes to ageing, even maintaining strength is a win. Without training, these same individuals would likely have lost at least 6% of their strength over six years. Instead, they gained 50–60%. All while training (albeit hard) only once per week for 20 minutes. The potency of strength training is incredible. ------------------------- 📊 Data from: Steele J, Fisher JP, Giessing J, Androulakis-Korakakis P, Wolf M, Kroeske B, Reuters R. Long-Term Time-Course of Strength Adaptation to Minimal Dose Resistance Training Through Retrospective Longitudinal Growth Modeling. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2023 Dec;94(4):913-930.

Explore categories