Team-Based Problem Solving

8D PROBLEM SOLVING EXAMPLE FORMAT AND EXAMPLE: PROBLEM: Surface Scratches on Painted Parts D1 – Team Formation Formed a cross-functional team with members from Quality, Production, Paint Shop, and Maintenance. D2 – Problem Description Issue: Surface scratches on final painted parts. Location: Paint Shop – Final Inspection Area. Timing: Observed consistently over the past 3 days. Magnitude: Rejection rate increased to 15% (standard is <2%). Impact: Increased rework and delayed customer shipments. D3 – Interim Containment Action Isolated all painted parts for 100% visual inspection. Reworked all affected parts before dispatch. Instructed operators to wear gloves when handling painted components. D4 – Root Cause Analysis Scratches caused by burrs on metal hanging hooks in the conveyor system. No preventive maintenance schedule existed for hook inspection. Root Cause: Worn-out, unmaintained hooks with sharp edges. D5 – Permanent Corrective Action Replaced all burr-marked hooks with new, smooth-surfaced ones. Introduced a weekly checklist for hook inspection and maintenance. D6 – Implementation and Validation Actions implemented across all 3 shifts. Post-implementation, rejection rate dropped from 15% to 1.2% in 2 weeks. Effectiveness validated through quality audits and data analysis. D7 – Prevent Recurrence SOP updated to include hook inspection procedure. Conducted training for all Paint Shop and maintenance staff. Hook audit added to monthly quality schedule. D8 – Team Recognition Appreciation email sent by Quality Head. Team recognized during the monthly Quality Circle meeting.

I timed it yesterday: A leadership team spent 47 minutes "solving" the same issue they've tackled in every meeting for the past 4 months. Sound familiar? They identified symptoms, not causes. Everyone had opinions, few had solutions. They created action items no one completed. The problem returned, slightly repackaged. This isn't just inefficient. It's the silent killer of growing businesses. After implementing EOS with 500+ entrepreneurial companies over 15 years, I've found teams waste up to 68% of their meeting time on recurring issues that never get solved at the root. The difference between teams that solve issues once and teams stuck in the loop isn't intelligence. It's methodology. Enter the Issues Solving Track - the EOS tool that transforms how leadership teams attack problems: 1. IDENTIFY the real issue Most teams get this wrong. They discuss symptoms, not causes. Try this instead: → Write the issue as one clear sentence → Ask "Why is this happening?" three times → Determine if it's a people issue, process breakdown, or communication gap A manufacturing client kept "solving" quality problems until they properly identified the real issue: unclear quality standards, not lazy employees. 2. DISCUSS with discipline The discussion phase isn't: → A platform for the loudest voice → A place for tangents and war stories → A political positioning exercise It is: → A focused examination of relevant facts → A space for diverse perspectives → A way to challenge assumptions respectfully The best teams have a designated facilitator who keeps discussion on track and ensures every voice contributes. 3. SOLVE completely The only reason to discuss an issue is to solve it. When you've reached clarity, document: → A specific action step → One person accountable (not a department) → A concrete due date (not "ASAP" or "ongoing") Then move on. No revisiting. No second-guessing. A software company I work with was averaging 3.5 hours in weekly leadership meetings. After implementing the Issues Solving Track, they cut meeting time to 90 minutes while solving twice as many issues. The best businesses aren't the ones without problems. They're the ones that solve problems at the root. Want to implement the Issues Solving Track in your business? Use the process below 👇

The best leaders don’t just give orders—they leverage their team’s strengths to solve problems together. This reduces the cognitive load at the top and spreads it across the organization, making it more efficient and creative. People want to feel useful, valued, and heard. When you tap into what they’re great at and let them shape improvements, they take ownership—and that’s when real change happens. The Problem: People Feel Stuck & Frustrated When employees hit friction in their work, they often don’t speak up—because they think nothing will change. This leads to frustration, disengagement, and inefficiency. Meanwhile, leaders try to fix things from the top down without fully understanding the problem—wasting time, money, and energy on solutions that don’t stick. The Solution: Leverage Strengths, Not Just Systems Instead of dictating change, bring your team into the process. Find out where they feel stuck, and help smooth out the friction. Here’s how: 1️⃣ Listen First 🔹 Hold working sessions, not just meetings—ask employees what’s slowing them down. 🔹 Gather feedback from the front lines—they see the problems leadership often misses. 2️⃣ Identify Superpowers 🔹 What unique skills or perspectives does each person bring? 🔹 Who naturally spots inefficiencies? Who excels at problem-solving? 3️⃣ Empower People to Own Solutions 🔹 Instead of handing them an answer, ask: “How would you fix this?” 🔹 Encourage experimentation—small tests lead to big improvements. 4️⃣ Support & Iterate 🔹 When friction appears, help smooth it out—don’t let people stay stuck. 🔹 Recognize what’s working and adjust what’s not—this keeps momentum going. People don’t want to be told what to do—they want to contribute to meaningful change. When you tap into their strengths and let them help shape solutions, they don’t just accept improvements—they own them. How do you leverage your team’s superpowers?

Teams often implement solutions that do not fix the problem they were trying to address. That's because the issue wasn’t framed correctly in the first place. This is especially true in complex or unfamiliar situations, where quick conclusions feel comforting but are often wrong. When I work with teams on decision-making, I turn to a framework developed by Julia Binder and Michael Watkins. Their E5 approach helps leaders define the right problem before trying to solve it. Phase 1: EXPAND Suspend early judgments and deliberately broaden how the challenge is understood. By exploring multiple interpretations of the issue, teams uncover hidden assumptions, surface blind spots, and create the conditions for more original thinking before jumping to answers. Phase 2: EXAMINE Shift from scope to depth. Teams analyze the problem rigorously, moving beyond visible symptoms to identify behavioral patterns, structural drivers, and underlying beliefs that reveal what is truly at play. Phase 3: EMPATHIZE Center on the perspectives of those most affected by the issue. Through (real) listening and reflection, teams gain insight into stakeholders’ motivations, emotions, concerns, and behaviors, often uncovering needs that data alone cannot reveal. Phase 4: ELEVATE Step back to see how it fits within the broader organization. Viewing the challenge through lenses such as structure, people, power, and culture exposes interdependencies and systemic tensions that shape outcomes. Phase 5: ENVISION Articulate a clear future state and map a path to reach it. Working backward from a shared definition of success, teams prioritize initiatives, sequence efforts, and align resources to move from understanding to execution. I've found that when leaders take the time to frame problems well, they increase the likelihood that those solutions will actually matter. #decisionMaking #leadership #perspective #learning #problems Source: The model is described in more details in this Harvard Business Review article: https://lnkd.in/gAeBb5uT

𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒎𝒆𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒕𝒐𝒐𝒌 𝟗𝟎 𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒖𝒕𝒆𝒔. 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒎? 𝑺𝒕𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒖𝒏𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝒅. Customer delivery was failing. Promises missed. Revenue bleeding. The entire meeting: "Whose fault is this?" Sales blamed Operations. Operations blamed Product. Product blamed Sales for unrealistic timelines. Sales blamed Leadership. Round and round. Finally, the COO stopped it: "I don't care whose fault it is. What's broken?" They mapped the process. Found the real issue in 15 minutes: a system handoff no one owned. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘺 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘯𝘵 90 𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘯 "𝘸𝘩𝘰." 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘴𝘸𝘦𝘳 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘪𝘯 "𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵." 𝑾𝒉𝒆𝒏 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒔 𝒈𝒆𝒕 𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒅, 𝒍𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒎𝒂𝒌𝒆 𝒕𝒘𝒐 𝒇𝒂𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒌𝒆𝒔: Mistake 1: They hunt for WHO instead of WHAT Blame dissipates energy. It feels productive—someone’s accountable!—but it solves nothing. Quality thinker W. Edwards Deming estimated that most failures come from systems and processes, not individual employees. Yet we spend most problem-solving time on people. Mistake 2: They add resources to broken systems "We’re overwhelmed. Hire more people." But if the process takes 47 steps when it should take 12, more people just means more people struggling. 𝘈𝘥𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘣𝘳𝘰𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘥𝘺𝘴𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝑴𝒚 𝑹𝒐𝒐𝒕 𝑪𝒂𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝑷𝒓𝒐𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒎-𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑭𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌 When a problem hits: 𝟏. 𝐁𝐚𝐧 "𝐖𝐇𝐎" 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝟑𝟎 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐬 ❌ "Whose fault is this?" ✅ "What's happening? What's the actual symptom?" Focus on facts first. Blame later (or never). 𝟐. 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐞 𝐁𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐎𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐧 Don’t solve symptoms. Use the 5 Whys: → Delivery late. Why? → Backlog. Why? → Orders spiked. Why? → Sales overpromised. Why? → Comp plan rewards speed, not feasibility. 𝟑. 𝐀𝐬𝐤: "𝐏𝐄𝐎𝐏𝐋𝐄 𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐘𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐌?" If 3+ people struggle with the same thing, it’s not them. It’s the process. Fix the system first. Then see if you need more capacity. 𝟒. 𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭: 𝐖𝐡𝐨 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐁𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠? Problem-solving reveals character. Are you blaming or building? Reactive or strategic? Covering or learning? 𝘉𝘭𝘢𝘮𝘦 𝘣𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘴 𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘴𝘵. 𝘈𝘤𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘧𝘪𝘹𝘦𝘴 𝘴𝘺𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘮𝘴. 𝑹𝒆𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒄𝒕: → What problem are you "solving" by hiring more people instead of fixing the process? → When did you last spend more energy on WHO than WHAT—and what did it cost? (Next time a problem hits, ban blame for 30 minutes. Watch what shifts.) Next week: 𝑭𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 — anticipating problems before they become crises. 𝘗.𝘚. 𝘞𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘨𝘪𝘤 𝘦𝘥𝘨𝘦? → 𝑻𝒉𝒆 𝑰𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒓 𝑬𝒅𝒈𝒆 https://lnkd.in/gi-u8ndJ 𝘗.𝘗.𝘚. 𝘙𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 𝘳𝘰𝘰𝘵-𝘤𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮-𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘢𝘣𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘺? 𝘋𝘔 𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘦𝘹𝘱𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘦𝘹𝘦𝘤𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘢𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨. #TheInnerEdge #ProblemSolving #RootCauseAnalysis #StrategicLeadership

Applying Cummings & Worley Group Diagnostic Model #OrganizationalDevelopment #TeamDynamics #PharmaIndustry #Leadership #ChangeManagement Scenario Background: A mid-sized pharmaceutical company has been experiencing declining productivity and increasing conflict within its research and development (R&D) teams. The leadership suspects that ineffective team dynamics and poor alignment of goals might be contributing factors. To address these issues, How L & D professional can utilize the Group Level Diagnostic Model, which focuses on diagnosing and improving group effectiveness within an organization. Step 1: Entry and Contracting: Objective: Establish a clear understanding of the project scope, objectives, and mutual expectations with the R&D teams. Actions: Conduct initial meetings with team leaders to discuss the perceived issues and desired outcomes. Step 2: Data Collection Objective: Gather information to understand current team dynamics, processes, and challenges. Actions: Distribute surveys and conduct interviews to collect data on team communication, collaboration, role clarity, and decision-making processes. Observe team meetings and workflows to identify misalignments and potential areas of conflict. Use assessment tools to measure team cohesion, trust levels, and satisfaction among team members. Step 3: Data Analysis Objective: Analyze the collected data to identify patterns, root causes of dysfunction, and areas for intervention. Actions: Compile and analyze survey results and interview transcripts to identify common themes and discrepancies. Map out communication flows and decision-making processes that highlight bottlenecks or conflict points. Assess the alignment between team goals and organizational objectives. Step 4: Feedback and Planning Objective: Share findings with the teams and plan interventions to address the identified issues. Actions: Conduct feedback sessions with each team to discuss the findings and implications. Facilitate workshops where teams can engage in problem-solving and planning to improve their processes and interactions. Develop action plans that include specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) objectives to enhance team performance. Step 5: Intervention Objective: Implement interventions aimed at improving team dynamics and effectiveness. Actions: Initiate team-building activities that focus on trust-building and role clarification. Provide training sessions on conflict resolution, effective communication, and collaborative problem-solving. Realign team goals with organizational objectives through strategic planning sessions. Step 6: Evaluation and Sustaining Change Objective: Assess the effectiveness of interventions and ensure sustainable improvements. Actions:Conduct follow-up assessments to measure changes in team performance and dynamics. Hold regular meetings to discuss progress and any ongoing issues. Adjust interventions as necessary based on feedback and new data.

 Is your team stuck in silos, moving like a factory assembly line? 🏭 There's a better way. In Tech Lead Journal episode #224, experienced CPTO Klaus Breyer shares an interdisciplinary approach to building truly high-performing teams. His core insight? We're treating software engineering like manufacturing when it's actually a design process. This fundamental misunderstanding is why: • Agile and Scrum has become a micromanagement tool • Ticketing systems create communication silos • Teams build solutions instead of solving problems Klaus introduced a revolutionary approach: "Move Fast, Break Silos." Here's what resonated most with me: ⤷ Slice work differently Not just into tasks, but into objectives → problems → solutions → delivery. Give teams problems to solve, not just tickets to close. ⤷ Empower small teams Dynamic groups of 2-3 people work best. They own their outcomes, not just their output. ⤷ Break the conveyor belt mindset Software development is creative problem-solving, not assembly line work. Stop treating engineers like factory workers. The most powerful takeaway? When you align small, empowered teams with real customer problems, they don't just ship features—they deliver value. Watch the full episode to discover how to transform your team from a ticket-processing factory into a high-performing, problem-solving team. --- ❓ What's your experience with breaking down silos in your organization?

An executive client confessed last month: "I'm drowning. My team brings me issues, I offer to help, and suddenly I'm working weekends on their deliverables." Sound familiar? Here's what's actually happening: Every time someone brings you a problem and you say "Send it to me" or "Let me think about it," you've just adopted their responsibility. My client was carrying 23 problems that belonged to other people. TWENTY-THREE. No wonder she had no time for strategy. She was too busy solving everyone else's problems. We tried an experiment. For one week, she could only respond to problems with: "What have you tried so far?" "What options are you considering?" "What do you recommend?" "What's your next step?" "When will you update me?" Week one was brutal. Her team stood frozen, waiting for her to solve things like always. Week two? They started bringing solutions, not just problems. By week three, she'd reclaimed 15 hours. Her team was making decisions. Real ones. The shift: 🎯 Each problem stays with its owner 💡 Next move is theirs, not yours ✨ You coach the approach, not do the work 🌱 Schedule your check-ins (minimize those swoops!) Your team doesn't need you to solve their problems. They need you to believe that they can solve them. Which of your team's problems will you let them solve this week?

Problem-Solving Is a Verb, Not a Noun In many organizations, problem-solving is treated like a concept — something you learn in a training or list on a resume. But real impact doesn’t come from knowing about problem-solving. It comes from doing it. Problem-solving is a verb. It lives in action — not in decks, dashboards, or laminated posters. Visual Management: Built to Solve, Not to Admire Tier boards, KPIs, hour-by-hour charts — they exist for one reason: To make problems visible, solvable, and preventable. They’re not there to color-code your way to green before the site director walks by. If your board looks perfect but no one’s solving anything, it’s decoration — not management. Tier Meetings: Where Problem-Solving Culture Starts Tier 1 meetings should solve 80% of problems — right at the source, by the people doing the work. If every issue escalates to Tier 3 or CI, you don’t have a tier system — you have a fire drill. Simple tools like 5-Why, checksheets, and immediate containment should be the norm, not the exception. Pareto to Prioritize. 8-Step to Solve. Here’s how high-performing teams operate: 1. Use Pareto to identify the top recurring issues. 2. Apply 8-Step Problem Solving only to those — not every squeaky wheel. Use 8-Step for: • Cross-functional or cross-shift issues • Customer complaints or audit findings • Safety or compliance risks • Anything that keeps coming back Don’t waste 8-Step rigor on one-off hiccups. Use your data to pick the right battles. Tier Meeting Power Questions To shift from reporting to solving, ask: • “What problem did we actually solve yesterday?” • “Is this a one-time issue or a trend?” • “What’s the real root cause — not just the symptom?” • “Who owns the countermeasure?” • “How will we know it worked?” • “If it comes back tomorrow, what’s our next move?” And the one that cuts through the noise: “Are we solving the problem — or just passing it along?” Making Tier Meetings Matter • Let the gap drive the conversation — not the metric. • Push ownership to the lowest responsible level. • Build visual triggers that demand action, not just updates. • If it hits Tier 3, require full 8-Step rigor. • Celebrate fixes, not just escalations. Final Thought Pareto helps you focus. 8-Step helps you go deep. Tier meetings give you rhythm. But none of it matters unless someone takes action. Because no board, no chart, no meeting has ever solved a problem on its own. Problem-solving is a verb. It starts at Tier 1. #continuousimprovement #lean #leadership

Your team waits for you to solve everything. Not because they can't think but because you've trained them not to. Every time they bring a problem, you solve it faster than they could. Your pattern recognition is sharper. Your analysis cuts deeper. You're right more often. So they keep coming back. Your calendar fills with problem-solving meetings. Eighty percent of your day is spent answering questions, breaking ties, spotting what others miss. You built this trap yourself. Intelligence created your early success. Now it's your ceiling. The genius who can't distribute their thinking stays stuck at their own processing speed. Team learns helplessness. Growth caps at your cognitive capacity. Onboarding takes six months because everything lives in your head. Someone asks a question. You answer. Next week, different person, same question. You answer again. Knowledge stays locked inside you because documentation feels like overhead. Tacit expertise feels like job security. It's not. You're making 50 decisions a day. Most of them tactical. Deep analysis on low-stakes situations. Zero hours for strategic thinking. Competitors move faster with worse decisions. You're still analyzing. Optimizing for "right" means missing ten decisions while perfecting one. Optimizing for "fast and 75% accurate" means iteration cycles compound. The shift happens when you stop solving and start systematizing. Document the pattern, not just the answer. "This situation reminds me of X because..." Make your pattern-matching visible. Turn tacit knowledge into explicit frameworks. Categorize decisions: reversible versus irreversible. Reversible gets 48 hours max. Act on 70% certainty with structured risk mitigation. Track accuracy by decision category. Measure team performance when you're unavailable. Your intelligence isn't the competitive advantage. Your intelligence infrastructure is. Pattern recognition velocity increases through exposure and documentation. Decision accuracy improves through feedback loops. Cognitive load drops when decisions run through frameworks. Intelligence hoarded stays fragile. Intelligence systematized compounds. The team that learns your pattern-matching outpaces the team that waits for your answers. ----- I help ambitious leaders escape burnout through systematic frameworks. Supercharge your career with my Leadership Superpowers newsletter: gplead.com/nl