Mastering Customer Communications: Why Cross-Functional Governance is Key to Driving Change Every company wants to keep customers informed—but without the right governance, communications become disjointed, overwhelming, and ineffective. Too many emails. Too many teams sending messages. Too little coordination. Customers don’t care if an email comes from Marketing, CS, or Product. They just want clear, valuable info at the right time that's relevant to them. Affectionately, at Freshworks we call it 'air traffic control' because it requires herding cats to solve for a bigger cross-functional problem. Most companies lack a unified strategy for customer communications. Instead, different teams send messages based on their own priorities: ❌ Marketing wants to drive engagement → Sends webinar invites and thought leadership. ❌ CS wants to drive adoption → Sends onboarding guides and feature tips. ❌ Product wants to drive usage → Sends release notes and announcements. ❌ Sales wants to drive expansion → Sends upsell and cross-sell messages. The result? Customers get bombarded with messages that feel disconnected. How to Build a Strong Governance Model for Customer Communications ✅ Centralize Oversight with a Cross-Functional Team 🔹 Form a Customer Comms Council with teams from Marketing, CS, Product, Sales, RevOps, etc. to prioritize the most meaningful comms at any given moment. 🔹 Set up the basics like a shared calendar to track all customer-facing messages and prevent overload. ✅ Define Communication Tiers & Priorities 🔹 Not every update needs an email. Map messages to the best channels (email, in-product, community, knowledgebase, blog, etc.). 🔹 Set rules for who owns which type of communication (e.g., CS leads onboarding emails, Marketing owns advocacy outreach). 🔹 Set rules for the types of comms for each system from Marketo (promotional), Gainsight (operational), Medallia / Qualtrics (feedback), etc. ✅ Move from Ad-Hoc to Intentional Messaging 🔹 Align customer messages with major milestones in the customer journey. 🔹 Ensure every communication drives action—whether it's a webinar signup, feature adoption, or a renewal decision. ✅ Measure & Optimize 🔹 Track open rates, engagement, and retention impact. 🔹 Identify overlaps & gaps—are customers getting redundant messages? Are critical updates being missed? Governance Enables a State Change in Customer Communications. It shouldn’t be a free-for-all. Governance brings clarity, coordination, and impact. When cross-functional teams work together, customers receive the right messages, at the right time, from the right source. 💡 How does your team align on customer communications today? What’s working (or not)? #CustomerCommunications #CustomerEngagement #RetentionMarketing #B2BMarketing #CustomerSuccess #CustomerMarketing #Governance
Cross-Functional Customer Experience Coordination
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Cross-functional customer experience coordination means different teams within a company—like sales, marketing, product, and support—work together to deliver a seamless and consistent experience for customers. Instead of each group operating separately, they align their decisions, communications, and processes so customers don’t feel confused or overwhelmed by disconnected interactions.
- Centralize communication planning: Use shared calendars or councils to track and organize all customer messages so customers receive clear, timely information without being flooded by unrelated updates.
- Build shared ownership: Encourage teams to co-own every stage of the customer journey and celebrate wins or solve challenges as a group, which keeps the focus on delivering value rather than defending separate goals.
- Align on customer insight: Make it a habit for every department to listen to real customer feedback and discuss it together so daily decisions stay grounded in actual customer needs and experiences.
-
-
The Hardest Truth in Go-To-Market? 💥🔥 Let’s stop pretending the friction between Sales and Customer Success is “healthy tension.” It’s not. It’s expensive. It’s inefficient. And it’s costing us growth. Here’s the truth 👇 Customers aren’t creating the friction. We are. We build silos, not systems. We measure functions, not outcomes. We celebrate individual wins while the customer experience breaks in between them. Sales blames CS for poor adoption and low impact. CS blames Sales for bad-fit deals. Product blames everyone for unclear feedback. And the customer? They just want one thing: a seamless experience that gets them value... fast. 💡 The real enemy isn’t another department. It's misalignment. We keep optimizing inside our swim lanes while the customer is drowning in the gaps between them. Here’s what needs to change 👇 1️⃣ Shared ownership of the customer journey. Sales doesn’t “hand off” to CS. CS doesn’t “inherit” the customer. We co-own the outcome from first conversation to lasting impact. 2️⃣ Shared metrics. No more “my quota” vs. “my renewal target.” One scoreboard: growth, retention, expansion, and time to value. (and yes, I know we need individual clarity and accountability) 3️⃣ Shared accountability. When things go right, celebrate together. When things go wrong, fix them together. At DISQO, we’re learning that cross-functional dependency isn’t a liability; it’s a competitive advantage if you embrace it with clarity, trust, and urgency. Because when Sales and CS stop pointing fingers and start pulling in the same direction, everything changes: 🧭 The customer moves faster. 📈 Revenue grows faster. 💪 Teams get stronger. So here’s my challenge as we wrap the week 👇 🔥 Where are you defending a function instead of driving an outcome? 🔥 What wall can you tear down between Sales, CS, or Product before Monday? 🔥 How can you turn dependency into velocity? Because the future of growth isn’t Sales-led or CS-led. It’s alignment-led. #Leadership #CustomerSuccess #Sales #Alignment #Revenue #CreateTheFuture #DISQO
-
Almost 10 years ago, I stepped away from my Head of Marketing role. Not because I didn’t love marketing, I did. A lot in fact. But because I wanted to solve the problem that I, and lots of my marketing peers were being tripped up by ↓ The disconnect between campaign and core. Companies often prioritise the performance customers see, but overlook the experience they feel. Brands craft powerful marketing messages promising simplicity, customer-centricity, or innovation, only for customers to experience the exact opposite once they interact with the business. 👎 A “customer-first” company with an impossible-to-reach support team. 👎 A “seamless” experience riddled with friction. 👎 A personalised campaign that leads to a generic, frustrating journey. And it's why I became a service designer; to bridge the gap between the customer experience and how teams show up, interact and deliver it every day. It’s not enough to talk about customer-centricity, because your customers are gonna see right through that. It has to be seen, actioned and felt in how teams work, make decisions, and design experiences - with your customers need at the core. Because this is the production behind your performance. At The Marketing Meetup last night, I shared my journey of building customer-centric cultures, and the three key steps that make it happen (OK, caveat here, this is a massively over-simplified version): ✅ Understand Customer insight isn’t just a marketing function. Every team should be plugged into real customer conversations. Dive into the data then push it further; spend time in their shoes, immerse yourselves in their worlds and bring those experiences into your daily team interactions. ✅ Embed Align your values and ways of working with your brand promises; map the experience gap by comparing brand messaging with real customer experiences. Train teams to think customer-first, ensuring CX is part of daily decision-making, and recognise and reward employees who bridge the gap, turning customer-centricity into action. ✅ Operate Customer-centricity must be a business-wide way of working, we're talking about moving from slogans to systems; Design cross-functional engagement strategies that span the 5Es: entice, enter, engage, exit and extend and develop customer journey ownership models - set up squads that are clear on who is responsible for each stage, and how teams work together to improve the end-to-end experience. Great brands don’t just tell great stories. They live them, from campaign to core. What companies do you think are doing this well? I would love to crowd-source a list of these examples, let me know in the comments below 👇 #CustomerCentricity #BrandExperience #ServiceDesign
-
Over the years, I've discovered the truth: Game-changing products won't succeed unless they have a unified vision across sales, marketing, and product teams. When these key functions pull in different directions, it's a death knell for go-to-market execution. Without alignment on positioning and buyer messaging, we fail to communicate value and create disjointed experiences. So, how do I foster collaboration across these functions? 1) Set shared goals and incentivize unity towards that North Star metric, be it revenue, activations, or retention. 2) Encourage team members to work closely together, building empathy rather than skepticism of other groups' intentions and contributions. 3) Regularly conduct cross-functional roadmapping sessions to cascade priorities across departments and highlight dependencies. 4) Create an environment where teams can constructively debate assumptions and strategies without politics or blame. 5) Provide clarity for sales on target personas and value propositions to equip them for deal conversations. 6) Involve all functions early in establishing positioning and messaging frameworks. Co-create when possible. By rallying together around customers’ needs, we block and tackle as one team towards product-market fit. The magic truly happens when teams unite towards a shared mission to delight users!
-
It’s been almost a year since we started our experience management journey at Lloyds Banking Group; it’s becoming our design system for CX. We’re about to scale it, so I thought I would reflect on what we’ve learnt over these last 12 months. 1. Your experience hierarchy and journey framework are the backbone of your system. It is the shell that structures experiences at different levels across customer types, products, and channels. You won’t see results until everyone can embrace it. 2. Your hierarchy and framework must work on paper, on a digital whiteboard, and in sophisticated software. There cannot be barriers to entry. 3. This system turns journeys into data products that require structured inputs (like OKRs, analytics, quant and qual research), and structured outputs (like opportunities, propositional bets, and solutions). 4. This, in turn, invites your whole company to align on how you structure and classify metrics, research, opportunities, and solutions cohesively. This is a hard task at enterprise level. 5. This system isn’t a design thing or a CX thing; it’s a real-time outside-in view of how your business is serving customers. It only sticks if product, design, engineering, marketing, operations, etc., all embrace it. This takes a hell of a lot of storytelling and pitching. 6. You can see and feel results such as reduction of siloes and duplication, more efficient delegation of backlog items, and faster design-to-delivery cycles after (approx) 10 end-to-end journeys go live. The language and way of working becomes a domino effect across the organisation, at all levels. 7. This opens the door to conversations about journey-centric operating models— what would that look like, and what would it take? 8. Like a design system, it needs a governance model (and a core team) to create, maintain, and remove components.
-
CX Success Demands a Unified Front: People, Process, Tech Many companies create a "CX department," thinking the job is done. This is a common pitfall. Customer Experience (CX) is not a siloed effort; it is the entire organization's responsibility. It touches every single interaction. I learned this years ago when a siloed approach led to inconsistent customer messages. It hurt the brand. True CX excellence begins with our people. It is a mindset, a cultural shift. We must break down internal barriers. Our teams need to work across functions, not just within them. Incentives must align with customer satisfaction. This means moving past departmental targets. We need to measure how well we serve the customer at every touchpoint. This creates a collective drive. Then there is the crucial link between employee experience (EX) and CX. Happy employees create happy customers. A frustrated internal team cannot deliver exceptional service. It is a simple truth. We invest in our employees. We give them the tools and support they need. Their positive experience directly fuels a better customer journey. The lines blur here because one cannot thrive without the other. Customers today expect a seamless journey. They do not care which department owns the website, the app, or the call center. They just want a consistent, easy experience across all channels. This "omnichannel" approach is no longer optional. It is essential for survival. Our job is to coordinate these experiences. They must feel integrated, not disjointed. Finally, process and technology are our enablers. We must strip out complexity. We must remove friction points. Tools like CRM systems, AI analytics, and unified platforms track interactions. They help us understand the full customer story. They allow us to deliver that seamless experience. CX cannot be an isolated effort. It requires everyone, everything, working together. What is the biggest hurdle your organization faces in achieving a truly integrated CX? Let Digital Transformation Strategist discuss it with you.
-
Working an escalated customer issue? Don’t just "loop in" your internal leaders — prepare them. It’s easy to think: “𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘶𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘣𝘪𝘨 — 𝘭𝘦𝘵 𝘮𝘦 𝘊𝘊 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘏𝘦𝘢𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘗𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘵, 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵, 𝘰𝘳 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘊𝘌𝘖 𝘵𝘰 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘪𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴𝘭𝘺.” But if you don’t prep them, you risk adding noise — not value. Here’s what great CSMs do instead: They 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀-𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀 ahead of time. Because when a major issue hits — a critical bug, a failed onboarding handoff, a missed expectation — you only get one shot to show the customer that your company is aligned and taking ownership. That’s why it’s worth having this conversation in advance: “𝘏𝘦𝘺, 𝘪𝘧 𝘢 𝘴𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘴 𝘶𝘱, 𝘐 𝘮𝘢𝘺 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘱 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘤𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘳 𝘦𝘮𝘢𝘪𝘭. 𝘈𝘭𝘭 𝘐 𝘯𝘦𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘲𝘶𝘪𝘤𝘬 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦: ‘𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘬𝘴 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘧𝘭𝘢𝘨𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 — 𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘵𝘦𝘢𝘮 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘐’𝘭𝘭 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘬𝘦𝘦𝘱 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘥.’ This shows we’re aligned at the highest level and treating it as a priority. Five minutes of effort from a department head can create a huge impact — but only if they know 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 to say and 𝘄𝗵𝘆 it matters. It’s not about making your leaders customer-facing. It’s about giving them the context and confidence to step in 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦 — when it counts most. Because when done right, these touchpoints rebuild trust, show ownership, and reinforce that you’re not just managing the issue… your entire company is. Have you ever coached an internal leader through an escalation? What worked? Let’s compare notes. #customersuccess #escalation
-
✈️ Airlines rightfully obsess over fleet efficiency and route optimization. But one of the biggest untapped opportunities lies within: breaking down silos. I've seen how departmental walls between operations, commercial, finance, and legal quietly erode efficiency. These silos create blind spots, slow decisions, and limit innovation. In an industry where every percentage point matters, we can't afford this. The effects ripple through organizations. Cost overruns. Reduced profits. Weakened collaboration. Lower morale. Obstacles to customer service. In aviation, nearly half of operational delays stem from fragmented systems and siloed workflows, both within airlines and across the broader operational ecosystem. Airlines are complex ecosystems. Every decision ripples across departments. Revenue management impacts crew planning. Maintenance schedules influence network reliability. Customer experience depends on coordination between ground ops, cabin crew, and digital teams. When these connections break: operational inefficiencies, service disruptions, missed opportunities. Cross-functional teams and collaboration tools can help. But without addressing root causes such as misaligned incentives and knowledge barriers, silos rebuild themselves. So what actually works? Cross-departmental and cross-stakeholder training. It's one of the most effective tools I've used. It breaks down knowledge barriers and builds trust. When revenue managers understand operational constraints and pilots grasp commercial impacts, they collaborate because they see the value. The same applies to ground handlers, airports, and other partners. This isn't just about knowledge. It's about creating a mindset shift. But training alone isn't sustainable. You also need aligned goals so that departments optimize for the airline, not just their own functions. Open information flow so teams see the same data and understand trade-offs. Cross-functional structures that create joint accountability. Leadership commitment that reinforces collaboration. Continuous feedback to adapt. Breaking silos isn't quick. It's not one solution. It's all of them working together: • Training builds understanding and shifts mindsets. • Information flow creates transparency. • Structure creates accountability. • Incentives drive the right behavior. • Leadership sustains it. The payoff? Enhanced profitability. Stronger resilience. Improved operations. Better customer service. A collaborative culture. The future of airline profitability isn't just about planes and passengers. It's about people working together and understanding each other. What's your experience? 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁: 💾 Save for future reference 🔄 Share with your network and spread the knowledge #airlinemanagement #aviation #aviationleadership #air52insights #aviationindustry
-
I’ve spent my career sitting inside a lot of different teams. Social. Customer marketing. Advocacy. Community. Support. Brand. And often, the connective tissue between them. What that’s given me is a very specific vantage point. I’ve seen the data each team holds. The signals they notice. The moments of trust or frustration they’re closest to. And I’ve watched how often those insights stay siloed, even though they’re all about the same customer. Community teams see the long arc of relationships. They know who shows up even when there’s nothing in it for them, who quietly disappears, and what people talk about when they think no one is listening. Advocacy and customer marketing teams understand motivation, credibility, and why some customers raise their hands while others never will. Social teams see real-time sentiment, context, and culture. Support teams sit with customers at their most vulnerable moments, when the relationship is either repaired or broken. None of this work exists in isolation. The overlap is not accidental. It’s there because customer relationships don’t fit neatly into org charts. Community pros should be working closely with customer marketing and advocacy. Social and support should be in constant conversation. Not because it’s efficient, but because they are often seeing different chapters of the same story. When those teams don’t talk, customers feel it. They repeat themselves. They feel unseen. They sense the disconnect even if they can’t name it. Customer experience isn’t owned by one function. It’s created by the sum of these interactions, across time, channels, and moments of need. The sooner organizations stop treating these teams as separate motions and start treating them as parts of a shared relationship, the sooner collaboration stops feeling optional. And when that internal alignment clicks, CX stops being a slide in a deck and starts being something customers actually feel. That’s how you get customer experience as good as it can get.
-
Every time you draw an org chart, you're picking sides in battles that haven't started yet. That's just human wiring. Social identity theory shows people quickly form in-groups and out-groups, even on trivial distinctions. Any structure you choose will naturally create "us vs. them" dynamics. Without intentional design, you get the classic blame cycles: Sales says Marketing sends bad leads, Marketing says Sales doesn't follow up, and Engineering blames both teams for changing requirements mid-sprint. But you can architect your organization so those tribal instincts work for you instead of against you. Here's how: Design for the Work --------------------- ↳ Organize around the work. Map how value flows to the customer and align teams to that flow. Don't organize around internal convenience—and definitely don't design around specific people. Organize around the critical path from idea to customer value. ↳ Clarify decision authority. Ambiguity breeds conflict and delays. Be explicit about who decides, who's consulted, and who's informed. Unclear authority creates either turf wars or decision paralysis. ↳ Define cross-team handoffs. Wherever work passes between groups, nail down who owns what, what "done" looks like, and how problems get escalated. The real risk isn't within teams; it's in the transitions between them. Align the Incentives --------------------- ↳ Set common goals. Give cross-functional groups a small set of shared outcomes—revenue growth, customer retention, cost savings or any other collectively important target. Use cascading goals and KPI trees to show how individual work connects to the bigger picture. This keeps everyone pointed in the same direction instead of optimizing their own corner. ↳ Align rewards with cooperation. If bonuses are based only on silo performance, you'll get silo behavior. Shared metrics and joint outcomes encourage people to actually help each other succeed. Enable the Collaboration -------------------------- ↳ Support cross-functional work. Make sure teams have the data, tools, and forums needed to work together effectively. If those supports aren't intentional, collaboration erodes under daily pressures and competing priorities. You can't eliminate tribal instincts; they're hardwired. But you can architect your organization so those instincts work for you instead of against you. You probably can’t eliminate "us vs. them" entirely. But you can design so the structure channels natural group dynamics toward shared execution. #strategy #execution #orgdesign #teamwork
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Healthcare
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development