Foundation models (FMs) such as GPT, LLaMA, and CLIP are reshaping the landscape of recommender systems (RS), transforming how we personalize and interact with content across various domains like e-commerce, healthcare, and education. A recent comprehensive survey sheds light on this exciting convergence, identifying three powerful paradigms: 1. Feature-Based Paradigm: FMs enhance recommender systems by creating rich, semantic embeddings. For instance, BERT and CLIP help encode textual descriptions and multimodal data, dramatically improving feature representations and helping overcome challenges like data sparsity and cold-start scenarios. 2. Generative Paradigm: Leveraging models like GPT, this paradigm moves beyond mere recommendations, generating personalized content and explanations directly. It facilitates zero-shot/few-shot recommendations, personalized user experiences, and multimodal content generation, though it faces challenges around bias, control, and alignment with user intent. 3. Agentic Paradigm: Perhaps the most transformative, this approach uses autonomous FM-driven agents capable of real-time adaptation and interaction. Agentic systems integrate dynamic planning, reasoning, and user feedback loops to provide highly contextual and ethically aligned recommendations. Systems like AutoGPT illustrate how such agents proactively adapt to user preferences and environmental changes. The paper also discusses practical implementations across several recommendation tasks: - Top-N recommendations: Enhancing traditional ranking by incorporating semantic insights from FM embeddings. - Sequential recommendations: Leveraging FM's deep contextual understanding for accurate next-item predictions. - Conversational recommendations: Allowing more dynamic, natural dialogues between users and systems, significantly boosting user engagement. Despite substantial progress, the survey also highlights ongoing technical challenges such as efficiency, interpretability, fairness, and multimodal integration, offering a roadmap for future research directions. This comprehensive analysis by leading academic and industry institutions marks a critical step forward in our understanding of how Foundation Models can revolutionize recommender systems, paving the way for more sophisticated, user-centric, and intelligent recommendation platforms.
FM Industry Trends
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
FM industry trends refer to the evolving practices, technologies, and strategies within facilities management—the sector responsible for maintaining and supporting buildings and workplaces. Recent posts highlight how advanced digital solutions and automation are changing the way companies win clients and deliver services.
- Adopt smart technology: Invest in real-time reporting, client portals, and automated workflows to meet modern client demands and stay ahead of competitors.
- Prioritize seamless integration: Consolidate operations into a unified technology platform instead of relying on multiple legacy systems to improve transparency and service delivery.
- Embrace autonomous operations: Explore AI-driven solutions that guarantee scalable service levels and give clients instant visibility without manual effort.
-
-
The FM companies winning enterprise clients right now aren't winning on price. They're not winning on service breadth either. Here's what's actually happening in competitive bids today. Clients have gotten smarter. Their RFPs now include detailed CaFM requirements. Real-time reporting. Client portals. SLA automation. Configurable workflows. What used to be a "nice to have" section at the back of the document is now a scored evaluation criterion. And most FM companies are showing up to these bids with legacy tools that can't deliver any of it. Or worse, a patchwork of 4-5 different systems they're trying to pass off as an integrated tech stack. The companies that are winning have made a deliberate decision to treat their CaFM as a growth asset, not a back-office necessity. And now AI is raising the bar further. The bids that are going to define the next few years won't just ask about your reporting capabilities. They'll ask whether your operations run autonomously enough to guarantee service levels at scale. Whether your client gets real-time visibility without your team having to manually produce it. That's not a future question. I'm already seeing it. The FM companies that figure this out now will be very difficult to compete against in 24 months. Technology used to be what you bought after you won the client. Now it's what wins them in the first place. #ConnectedCMMS #AI #facilitiesmanagement
-
The Future of Radio in 2028: Three Predictions That Will Redefine the Industry As someone who studies media trends through both rigorous analysis and a forward-looking lens, I see radio entering one of the most transformative periods in its history. By 2028, three forces will reshape how stations generate revenue, engage advertisers, and position themselves in a competitive audio landscape. 1. Addressable Audio Becomes Mainstream By 2028, 30–40% of local radio ad budgets will be allocated to addressable audio campaigns. This means stations won’t just sell broad audience reach—they’ll deliver targeted messaging based on geography, demographics, or even listener behavior. For advertisers, it’s a leap from buying "time" to buying "precision." For stations, it requires investments in technology partnerships and data infrastructure, but the payoff will be higher CPMs and stronger relationships with local businesses that crave measurable outcomes. 2. Certified-Voice Advertising at a Premium AI-generated audio has already entered the marketing toolkit, but trust and authenticity will matter more than ever. That’s why every major radio cluster will offer a certified-voice ad product—an AI voice that’s legally protected, brand-approved, and consistently recognizable. Imagine a local bank securing its own custom synthetic spokesperson that can deliver thousands of personalized versions of an ad in seconds. Stations will charge a premium for these products because they combine the efficiency of AI with the credibility of traditional radio. This hybrid will redefine how we think about “live” versus “produced” content. 3. Cars Stay King—but Competition Shifts Despite the rise of smart speakers and mobile listening, cars will remain the most valuable radio platform in 2028. What changes is the battleground. Stations won’t just compete on ratings—they’ll compete on dashboard visibility and data rights. With connected cars serving as rolling media hubs, the fight will be about app placement, metadata control, and who owns the listening insights. Radio companies that secure partnerships with automakers and tech platforms will lock in a massive advantage. What This Means for Radio These shifts signal a new era where radio’s traditional strengths—local trust, immediacy, ubiquity—are fused with digital precision and innovation. Stations that embrace addressable campaigns, invest in certified-voice solutions, and claim their territory in the connected car ecosystem will thrive. Those who cling to legacy models risk being marginalized. The future isn’t about abandoning what made radio powerful; it’s about evolving it. 2028 isn’t that far away—now is the time to start building the capabilities that will define the next chapter of audio.
-
🌍 Indie Film Finance Deep Dive: EPISODE 4 – Future Trends & Strategic Implications (Series: Producing Smarter in the $30M-and-Under Indie Space) As distribution models evolve, independent filmmakers must think beyond platforms and into ecosystems. Here's what the road to 2030 looks like — and how to navigate it. 🔎 Market Evolution by 2030 The global film distribution market is projected to reach $169.6B by 2030. But where that revenue flows — and how — is rapidly shifting: • Digital channels expected to capture 75–85% of total revenue • Theatrical share declining to 15–25% but evolving into an event-driven model • Streamers expected to control 60–70% of digital distribution • Audience behavior demanding multi-platform access and engagement 🔹 Five Key Trends Reshaping Indie Film Distribution 1️⃣ AI-Powered Content Optimization From trailer cuts to timing strategies, AI tools now offer studio-grade marketing efficiency at indie budgets: • Predictive audience modeling • Automated trailer & asset generation • Dynamic pricing algorithms • Personalized marketing content by demo 2️⃣ Direct-to-Fan Monetization The creator economy is merging with indie film strategy: • Limited edition NFTs and collectibles • Live virtual cast meetups • Subscription-based communities • Recurring monetization beyond one-time views 3️⃣ International Co-Productions Global partnerships are no longer optional — they’re strategic: • 72% of Belgian films now include co-pro partners • ~$362M in annual co-pro financing tied to tax incentives • Expands festival and platform access across markets 4️⃣ Platform Aggregation & Subscription Fatigue Audiences now average 4–5 subscriptions. The market is responding: • Meta-platforms offering bundled discovery & billing • Cross-platform AI recommendation engines • Rebundling resembling cable — but smarter 5️⃣ Social Commerce Integration The line between storytelling and commerce is vanishing: • Shoppable content embedded in streamers • Merch drops linked to key plot moments • 80% of Gen Z say influencers drive their watch + purchase behavior 🧭 Strategic Implications for Filmmakers 🔹 Short-Term (2025–2027): • Plan multi-platform from day one • Build direct fan engagement ecosystems • Track performance with real-time data tools • Use blockchain for backend transparency 🔹 Long-Term (2028–2030): • Embrace AI to scale marketing without scaling teams • Pursue global co-pro opportunities with shared creative and fiscal control • Create IP with franchise or transmedia potential • Monetize beyond the screen through experiences, products, and social 🎯 The Path Forward The most successful indie filmmakers of the next decade won’t just be storytellers — they’ll be audience architects. They will: • Use tech to empower, not replace, creative vision • Treat distribution as part of pre-production strategy • Think globally, market personally • Own their data, audience, and backend
-
In 2025, I wrote 8 essays about music fandom, curation and discovery in the post-streaming era, now read by 3,600+ subscribers across the music business. I write to sharpen my own thinking, follow waves of curiosity, and stay close to the people I build products for: fans, curators, artists, and their teams. Over the past year, I’ve spoken to or worked with hundreds of music fans, artists, industry professionals and founders across the music stack. On the surface, things can feel bleak... AI slop flooding streaming services Mass layoffs across the industry The fewest new hits in U.S. history Artists and their teams burnt out from unsustainable touring and the hamster wheel of content creation But through my research, a different set of behavioral and cultural signals kept surfacing: 🎧 Independent curators building community around music discovery 📻 College radio stations overflowing with new DJs. 💿 People using iPods again and rebuilding their personal music libraries 🎵 Vinyl, a format from the 1940s, growing faster than streaming subscriptions 🎮 Artists embracing gaming and interactive worlds in creative ways We’re on the cusp of another major shift in how we listen to and connect with music. Technology accelerates change and enables new possibilities, but it's artist and fan behavior and demand that ultimately shape where we are going. What trends should I explore in 2026?
-
+3
-
Traditional FM vs. Modern FM Having spent over 20 years in Facilities Management, I’ve seen how much the industry has evolved - and how some mindsets still need to catch up. When I was an analyst/supervisor, our team was so obsessed with operational efficiency and cost-cutting initiatives. Fast forward to today; and our biggest concerns are sustainability, workplace experience, and helping the business attain its goals. With those things in mind, you can say that: -Traditional FM focused on keeping things running. -Modern FM focuses on helping the business run better. So, how does this paradigm shift look like? Traditional FM: “Quickly and efficiently fix assets when they break.” Modern FM: “Use tools like AI and data to prevent breakdowns before they happen.” Traditional FM: “Cut down on everything that's not essential to operations.” Modern FM: “Create value-add through smart investments, alignment, and strategic outcomes.” Traditional FM: “We are your handy-dandy fix-it crew.” Modern FM: “We are your business partners; and we'll help you drive performance.” Traditional FM: “We maintain buildings and assets - and we keep your space safe and clean.” Modern FM: “We directly affect the overall workplace experience and employee satisfaction.” Traditional FM: “Compliance first.” Modern FM: “Safety and sustainability are also parts of our strategy.” Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that Traditional FM is bad, and Modern FM is good. The point here is that FM - as we previously knew (or currently know) it - needs an UPGRADE. Today's business environment requires FM teams to both have mastery of the 'Traditional' and the strategic execution of the 'Modern'. Nowadays, it's about balancing operational excellence and cost-savings with strategic alignment and sustainability - ensuring short-term needs are met without sacrificing the long-term; and vice versa. Thus, the modern FM team isn’t just managing buildings - they’re also managing outcomes. Because FM isn’t just about maintaining spaces anymore - it’s about enabling success. So, my big question to business leaders is... "Is your FM team still stuck at mastering Traditional FM or have they already begun their roles as your strategic partners?" #FacilitiesManagement #Leadership #StrategicFM #Innovation #Sustainability #EHS #WorkplaceCulture #FMLeadership
-
Why Facilities Management Leaders Must Think Like CEOs? For years, Facilities Management (FM) was seen as a back-office function—keeping buildings running, managing repairs, and ensuring compliance. But today, FM leaders are playing a critical role in business strategy. If you’re in FM, it’s time to stop thinking just like an operations manager and start thinking like a CEO. Here’s why: 1. Cost Optimization = Business Growth CEOs don’t just cut costs—they optimize them for long-term impact. FM leaders must shift from a “budget-reduction” mindset to an investment mindset, using data-driven strategies to improve efficiency, sustainability, and asset longevity. 2. ESG & Sustainability Are Business Imperatives CEOs prioritize Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) initiatives because they impact brand reputation, compliance, and profitability. FM leaders must drive sustainability efforts—from energy efficiency to carbon footprint reduction—aligning with corporate goals. 3. Data-Driven Decision-Making Just as CEOs use financial and market data to guide strategy, FM leaders must leverage building analytics, IoT, and AI-powered insights to make smarter decisions on maintenance, space utilization, and workforce productivity. 4. Employee Experience & Workplace Strategy A CEO knows that a company’s biggest asset is its people. FM leaders should focus on workplace design, indoor air quality, and smart office solutions to create environments that boost productivity, well-being, and retention. 5. FM Leaders Must Speak the Language of Business To earn a seat at the table, FM professionals must communicate beyond technical terms. Instead of saying: ❌ “We need a higher maintenance budget.” ✅ Say: “A 15% increase in preventive maintenance investment will reduce emergency repairs by 30%, saving $500K annually.” Bottom Line: FM is no longer just about buildings—it’s about business strategy, operational efficiency, and competitive advantage. If you’re an FM leader, start thinking like a CEO and watch your impact grow!
-
The Trend Toward Defining Generic Scope of Work in Facilities Management Contracts to Avoid Risk: In recent years, we’ve seen an increasing trend in facilities management (FM) contracts where the scope of work is left deliberately generic. While this approach may seem like a risk mitigation strategy, it often leads to more challenges than solutions. Generic scopes can appear to offer flexibility and minimize liability on assets’ owners, but they risk creating ambiguity that impacts service delivery, performance measurement, and customer satisfaction. When expectations are not clearly defined, it becomes challenging for both parties—service providers and assets’ owners—to align on deliverables, leading to: 1. Miscommunication: Vague scopes result in differing interpretations of responsibilities. 2. Performance Gaps: Without clear benchmarks, evaluating success becomes subjective. 3. Erosion of Trust: Disputes over undefined expectations can strain relationships. 4. Increased Costs: Lack of clarity may require additional work orders or disputes over responsibilities. Instead, a well-defined scope of work ensures transparency, accountability, and mutual understanding. It allows for customized solutions tailored to the client’s specific needs, while still incorporating clauses to address unforeseeable risks. In today’s FM landscape, the balance lies in being precise without being overly rigid. By collaboratively crafting a detailed scope that includes measurable KPIs and built-in contingencies, we can drive better service outcomes while managing risks effectively. What are your thoughts on this trend? How can we strike the right balance between managing risks and delivering tailored, high-quality FM services? #FacilitiesManagement #Contracts #RiskManagement #ServiceExcellence #iFM
-
Two policy changes that could shift the balance on outsourcing And most of the industry isn't talking about them yet. - The Public Interest Test The government's new procurement reforms will mandate a Public Interest Test. Every government department and NHS Trust will have to assess whether a service can be delivered more effectively in-house before they outsource it. That's a fundamental shift. It moves the default from "we'll go to market" to "prove why we should go to market." - The Two-Tier Code The new Employment Rights Act reinstates the two-tier code, requiring contractor staff to be on the same terms and conditions as their public sector colleagues. As I mentioned in a previous post, this could add millions to the contract price on a large FM deal. It effectively removes one of the key competitive advantages outsourcing has over in-house delivery. Both of these will take time to implement. But given that big FM procurements take 12-18 months from decision to contract start, departments and Trusts need to start factoring these in now. So what could this mean for the sector? - Departments and Trusts who are already outsourced will need a much stronger business case if they want to outsource again. - It's going to be harder to convince public sector organisations to outsource for the first time. - Providers will need to find new ways to demonstrate value beyond cost savings. - Expect a wave of contract extensions as organisations avoid triggering the new requirements - The wholly owned subsidiary model suddenly looks a lot more attractive - In-house teams may start to grow again for the first time in years. If you work in public sector outsourcing, these two changes deserve your attention.
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Healthcare
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development