Why do I have to learn THAT?

Why do I have to learn THAT?

Technical writers don’t need to be very technical really. In reality, many are gifted at a more niche ability, being able to translate complex ideas into easy to understand documentation. Many writers use one set of tools throughout their career, and might be averse to the idea of learning other ways of doing the same thing. Why learn XML, when I know DITA? Why learn DITA-OT, when I can use the nice UI in SDL LiveContent to do the work for me. Why would a technical writer need to learn how to code? Why bother?

 

It’s worthwhile noting that there are people like this in every discipline. I worked in sales, and some people didn’t want to learn new techniques. They were making sales by being pushy and domineering, but they weren’t building relationships, and they weren’t getting repeat business. We can all get stuck in our ways sometimes, but some people do so to their own detriment, and it kills their growth.

 

Why are you afraid of skills?

 

This is a hard but important question. Do you worry that you won’t be able to learn the new way? You learned the old way, which was once esoteric and probably scary. Why put yourself through that again? The answer is personal growth. Putting yourself out there, trying to learn something new, is good for you, even if you fail. Making an honest effort and failing is better than not taking the chance, and deriding the idea of even trying. As Jake the Dog in the “kids” cartoon Adventure Time put it, “sucking at something is the first step to becoming sorta good at something”.

 

Want to stand out?

 

You know who doesn’t stand out? Someone with nothing unique to offer. If you aren’t differentiating yourself from the people around you, you have less leverage in your career. It might make you feel like another cog in the machine, but it’s better to be a rare cog than an easily replaced cog.

 

Do you understand?

 

Is understanding something ever really bad? Maybe you have a separate Information Architect who takes care of all of the systems, and you just write the words in between the tags. Perhaps you have wonderfully giving engineers for colleagues, people who are more than happy to explain code, or set up environments or perform some other complex task. While it’s nice to have resources, don’t you worry that you are using systems and languages you don’t truly know? Understanding is a necessary part of proficiency, and proficiency makes work a less stressful experience.

 

Why be (perceived as) a Lazybones?

 

Lack of growth and an unwillingness to learn new things makes you look lazy. You will become known as the guy who doesn’t want to do anything new. Whether your peers let you know or not, they are silently judging you. Peers are good at that. You may think completing the work is enough, but it’s not. Without development and progression, you’ll stagnate and be stuck where you are now indefinitely. People will be unwilling to give you projects, promotions or simple praise. Children will laugh and point. Well maybe not the last one, but all the rest. 

 

So, as a New Years resolution, why not learn something new this year? Not for your boss, or to fulfill your mandatory training requirements, but for yourself.

Good post, Patrick. To me every day is a school day, and I really appreciate that.

Like
Reply

Very appropriate post, Patrick, as I really struggled with the XML course but am glad I did it.

Good post, but I think there's an important point that's not been mentioned - job satisfaction. I've worked with technical writers who have quit the profession completely because of it. It wasn't that they couldn't or wouldn't learn code or new tools, it was that they didn't enjoy it. Many technical writers came into the profession because they are good at, and enjoy, writing and explaining things. When the writing comes second to coding or technical processes to do their own job, their job satisfaction goes down. I guess it is a tricky balance - if the tools become too technical, will it lead to only technical people being technical writers? In which case, does that create more distance between their perspective and that of novice users?

Interesting post Patrick and very relevant to the tech writing field. It's very easy to become pigeon-hold. Technologies are changing all the time and sometimes it can be hard to stay relevant. You are right though, as technical writers we have to constantly challenge ourselves to learn new technologies. and keep up with the latest trends. Use it or lose it!

Nice post, Patrick. As you imply, the ability (and willingness) to learn new things is by far our most important skills to nurture as professionals. Once you have that skill, almost everything else falls into place.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Patrick Hammond

  • Technical Writing and Agile

    I’ve been mulling over the role of the technical writer in an Agile team for some time. I wanted to jot down some of my…

  • Why write when you can solve?

    New writers get discouraged easily, because of the daunting volume of work involved. I understand this now more fully…

Others also viewed

Explore content categories