Synchronous VS Asynchronous Learning

In L&D, there's a constant struggle between these forms of learning. Which is best? What are the limitation and benefits of each? Lets take a look at this, and I've even thrown in what is considered the best solution at the end!

Synchronous Learning

This is by far the most hands-on approach. For the uninitiated, this is what you'd expect in a classroom, or in a live-learning session with a trainer. They're interactive, there's typically group work, and above all else, you're able to ask questions of the instructor to develop your understanding in particular areas. As you'd imagine, these are usually the sessions people come away from feeling as though they really gained value, keynote speakers and experts often leading them. The real-time nature of this leads to a higher engagement level in the course material.

If it's so effective, why would anyone use anything else?

Timing - all instructors and students have to be available at the same time.

Group dynamics - given the interactive, group-based nature of these, some individuals may not feel as though they receive the personalised assistance needed.

Quality of Instructor - Lets face it, these sessions live and die on the quality of the teacher. Just because one is an expert in their field, doesn't necessarily mean they're great teachers! Teachers need teaching, after all.

Cost - Inviting experts and quality trainers is usually the most expensive avenue to be taken for learning.

Asynchronous Learning

This is typically more practical. It refers to learning that doesn't rely on being in a certain place at a certain time. Online courses, watching videos, and quizzes, are all aspects of asynchronous learning. It doesn't rely on a high-quality instructor for people to gain value from the session, provided the course-material is well made.

It allows for learners to work at their own pace, so they don't feel left behind if the group moves quickly. Usually it's much cheaper, and can be readily accessed at a later time. The issues?

Lack of support - Whilst often an instructor may provide a contact email address, they can't answer questions in real- time. The delay between asking a question and having it answered can reduce the perceived value gained.

Lack of Interaction - Its strength is also its' weakness. With no-one leading the charge, it can be harder for individuals to properly engage with the material, and rely instead on just getting the minimum pass mark so they can get on with their 'real job'.

So, is there a solution? Why yes, I'm glad you asked ;)

Hybrid Learning

By combining the best parts of both, we can achieve something truly special.

Having access to a tutor in real time provides the immediate value, expanding ones interactivity with the material. Having all your classes material available to be Engaged with is the key difference between simply recording the instructor, and having a designated blended solution.

Do you have a solution that solves for these problems?

TL;DR - they both have problems, you need a good combo!