Scale Extrapolation Errors in Telecoms/Tech
Recently I wrote a fairly exasperated LinkedIn post about space datacentres and why they are a great example of what I’m calling a “scale extrapolation error”. They're a common type of cognitive bias in telecoms, technology and cloud / AI domains.
Scale extrapolation assumes a technology or business model that you observe at one level can scale smoothly (linearly or exponentially), up or down, while ignoring thresholds, multi-variable optimisation, and non-linear constraints.
I've written a full Substack article on the general definitions and causes of that error class.
The space DC post pointed out that having a (potentially good) way to scale one variable or input for a complex sector does not mean all the other necessary inputs or variables also scale.
Just because solar energy is cheap in space and it’s suddenly possible to deploy hundreds or thousands of satellites does not mean that it’s a substitute for terrestrial hyperscale DCs for cloud or AI use. They also need cooling, connectivity, maintenance, interconnection, developer support, low latency, reliability, regulatory oversight and much more.
I also cited some other "X can substitute Y" scale extrapolation errors and fallacies I commonly see:
In reality, a system’s performance, risk, economics, controllability and governance will move through different “regimes”, which alter the way in which scaling works.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Scale curves are never smooth.
And while I initially focused on "substitutional scale" - tech X will replace tech Y, as it’s got an advantage with variable A - that is not the only way this error-class manifests. It’s actually a family of error types, which manifest in a variety of ways for whole industries or individual companies or products:
The full article explores all of these, gives examples, and explains why Scale Extrapolation Errors are so seductive, even for the smartest people in technology. It also discusses how to spot these errors - which should be top-of-mind for industry strategists, investors and policymakers.
Some other examples:
The full article is available for free here on my Substack. Please click the link and subscribe for additional updates and articles, such as tech & policy document critiques.
#telecoms #cloud #mobile #5G #6G #policy #regulation #AI #datacentres #FTTH #strategy
I see similar “scale extrapolation” thinking in marketing. When success at a small scale quickly becomes a story about inevitable global scale, while many practical constraints are still unclear.
Scale extrapolation errors Dean Bubley, are especially dangerous in AI infrastructure debates right now. Once coordination layers, energy constraints, and policy actors enter the picture, you’re no longer scaling, you’re redesigning the system.
Dean, did you read this? https://karpf.substack.com/p/spaceballs-the-datacenter. The headline is "Why Musk's xAI-SpaceX Datacenter in Space is Bullshit". Makes me love physics and math even more. :)
A good post (specifically also the substack-deeperdive) 👍 At the same time regarding the perennial "#5G vs #WiFi" or "#FWA vs. #FTTx" theme we do know respective "sweet-spots" (incl. 'mainstream' deployment scenarios) of these technologies - and then also e.g. #AWS #Outposts do successfully serve specific deployment scenarios - though not all cloud use-cases ...
... not to mention the obvious geopolitical risks ... https://www.telecomstechnews.com/news/russian-luch-satellites-target-european-vital-connectivity/