The Right Wrapper for Feedback
This is a time when many companies are rethinking their performance management practices, in a way to enhance motivation and performance. A crucial aspect of the performance reviews is feedback. Delivered under the umbrella of performance review, this invariably achieves little, and often leaves both the manager and employee unsatisfied. It is not difficult to understand why - as it is often a defensive dialogue from both sides on hits and misses, with an eye on the resultant performance report (potentially impacting compensation).
While genuine feedback is cited as being a gift – the experience is more often not so. That is because it is often delivered with the wrong wrapper, and at the wrong time. In order for feedback to satisfy the criteria of a gift – it needs to be with an understanding of the employee’s personality, have a holistic view of the entire ecosystem, should be done at the right times, and importantly with a genuine interest in the employee’s growth & well-being. The performance review is the wrong wrapper for providing feedback – it gives a feeling of being critically judged, being a one-way communication, and ignoring the employee’s viewpoint and aspirations.
On the other hand, frequent and value adding feedback is more important than anything else. How then can this become a gift, which both sides would like it to be? In order for that to happen, significant re-orientation, facelift and re-launch is required. “Progress & Improvement dialogues” should replace “Performance Feedback”. This needs to be an open and frank dialogue on the progress, limitations, ways to achieve planned objectives, ideas for improvement, long term plans and any other areas of interest. Many times what is really required is the need for deep introspection, expression and sharing, rather than stiff and predictable conversations based on data points. In summary, this needs to be a dialogue to explore how great things can be achieved together - "Let's do it!".
A frequent and non-evaluative dialogue is far more enriching for both parties and also the organization. It reinforces the fact that both sides benefit by listening to the other. This is one key aspect of a non-hierarchical management style, and open culture which is so much required today.
Well said Bharat! The frequent and non-evaluative dialogues will surely solve this problem. But I personally think that the same is possible or can be easily applied in SMEs. I'm doubtful about its applicability in corporate/ large organizations, as the top / middle management personnel mostly have their personal interests edging over the organizational interests.
Totally agree frequent offline feed backs are more important than deadline based feed backs but it so much depends upon the maturity of the senior in question. Not many people are able to look at things in a holistic manner. Feedbacks should be looked at as an opportunity to grow professionally, keeping the pay out of the equation. However we have grown on the concept of pay and performance so it will be difficult to de link it.
Changing the title to Progressive & Improvement is a sound idea !