Reliability V. Availability

Reliability V. Availability

Reliability: The probability that an item will perform satisfactorily for a given period of time under a stated set of conditions.

Availability: The probability that an item will be capable of performing satisfactorily at some point in the future provided that it is currently performing satisfactorily.

Maintainability: The probability that an item can be returned to full service after a failure in a given period of time under a stated set of conditions.

Availability is a function of reliability and maintainability.  The greatest gains in availability are achieved by a two pronged approach that eliminates unnecessary work and makes the necessary work more efficient.

Reliability is a function of how well items are designed, manufactured, installed, operated and maintained.  Inherent reliability is set by the design of the item.  Each activity after that has a negative impact on reliability.   The goal for reliability engineers in the subsequent phases is to develop systems that minimize those negative impacts.

Maintainability is a function of the design and implementation of support systems.  The installation needs to be designed to enhance the ability to perform maintenance activities.  Support systems such as stores, the CMMS, HR, planning and scheduling, policies and procedures, and training need to be implemented in a way that minimizes the amount of time it takes to perform maintenance activities.

 

 

 

Again a very good article from you Bill. Hope it will be read and used. At least it is very clear and completely accurate.

Like
Reply

Let me add a John Egnatz word, "Versability" Eggy himself coined that word. Moving right along you have another John Egnatz word which you will use because you have a bit of "Obviousity", don't you ? Use them well everyone. Oh just one more thing, "your curious nature has motivated you to ask the obvious question". Hasn't it ? There you have it "Obviousity" brought to you by Eggy in Chicago. Eggy has "Versability.

Like
Reply

Funny how so many use the two as if they are interchangeable.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by William Keeter

  • Managing Reliability the DMSICOM Cycle

    Design The inherent reliability of an item is set during the design phase. Techniques such as design for reliability…

    6 Comments
  • Maintenance Strategy vs. Maintenance Tactics

    A maintenance strategy should be designed to achieve as much of the inherent reliability in an item as is required to…

    14 Comments
  • Which is Better CMRP or CRE?

    I have been asked this question a number of times. The short answer is "It depends".

    28 Comments
  • When Should Work on an Item be Counted as "Rework"?

    During a recent Maintenance and Reliability Best Practices training event we got into a discussion about how to define…

    19 Comments
  • Great Example of Managing by Walking Around

    Kaplan is talking about the balanced scorecard, but this is also an almost textbook perfect example of Managing by…

    2 Comments
  • p-f Interval -- Real or Imaginary?

    What is the p-f interval? Failure defined by Nowlan and Heap team. Failure: An unsatisfactory condition; any…

    56 Comments
  • What is a Failure Mode?

    Definition Nowlan & Heap -- The specific manner of failure, the circumstances or sequence of events which leads to a…

    10 Comments
  • FRACAS -- It's Not Just About Failure Codes

    Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action Systems (FRACAS) have been used for a long time to improve…

    3 Comments
  • Planning and Scheduling -- It's Not Just About Managing Work

    We all know how important the planning and scheduling process is for improving maintenance workflow and increasing the…

    4 Comments
  • What Causes Weibull Shapes

    Weibull Beta values give clues about how items are failing. Beta < 1 denotes infant failures.

    40 Comments

Explore content categories