The Paradox of Quantum Computing

The Paradox of Quantum Computing

To try distract you from these times of war and disease, let me tell you a joke: “Schrodinger takes his cat to the vet, for a check-up. The vet comes back 10 minutes later and says, “Well, I have good news and bad news…..” If you snickered at this, you know a bit about the Schrodinger Cat paradox, and therefore perhaps a little bit about quantum physics. For those who did not, the paradox explains the seeming contradiction between what we see with our naked eye, and what quantum theory tells what actually is in the microscopic state. The ‘Copenhagen Interpretation’ of quantum mechanics. states that ‘a particle exists in all states at once until observed’. Schrodinger’s cat is in a box, and could be alive or dead. However, till the box is opened, you would not be able to know whether its state is. Thus, the vet’s quandary above.

This principle, among others, powers one of the most exciting and bleeding edge advances in technology: Quantum Computing. I have written about it before in this publication, but to summarise: Our current powerful computers follow the principles of the Turing machine, where information is encoded into bits (1 and 0) and a series of operations (AND, OR, NOT, etc.) make these bits compute. A quantum computer uses qubits or the quantum version of bits; a qubit is not permanently a 0 or a 1, but it can be both at the same time! Only at the end of the computation, or when the box is opened, you can know whether it is a 0 or a 1, but during the computation process its exact state is indeterminate and can contain bits of both! If this went whooshing over your head, console yourself with what Bill Gates said in a 2017 WSJ interview: “I know a lot of physics and a lot of math. But the one place where they put up slides and it is hieroglyphics, it’s quantum.”.

A quantum computer can exploit these properties of quantum physics to perform certain calculations far more efficiently and faster than any computer or supercomputer, inspiring the likes of Microsoft, IBM and Google to work feverishly on this new form of computing. This is especially urgent because Moore’s Law is flattening, but the problems that need to be solved are becoming more complex: climate change, artificial general intelligence, drug personalization. While this is super exciting, a recent BBC article (https://bbc.in/3pA7pIY ) about the ‘quantum apocalypse’ made me pause.

A hidden force behind ecommerce, online banking and trading, crypto trading, social networking, messaging, almost everything we do is encryption. Most encryption uses public and private keys, and that in turn uses arcane mathematical calculations using prime numbers. Using a Turing computer to crack this encryption is virtually impossible, it would take thousands of years. However, potentially, a quantum computer would do this in mere seconds. Every minute, huge amounts of encrypted data are harvested without us knowing and stored in vast data banks, waiting for the day that they can be decrypted. Today there is nothing data thieves can do with this treasure trove, “…but once a functioning quantum computer appears that will be able to break that encryption… it can almost instantly create the ability for whoever’s developed it to clear bank accounts, to completely shut down government defence systems – Bitcoin wallets will be drained.” says lyas Khan, CEO of Quantinuum. Not only this, but current encryption methods will be useless, halting online banking transactions, ecommerce, social media interactions, everything. . The security of every public blockchain will be under threat from quantum computing power, since it relies on heavy duty cryptography; it was no coincidence that the price of Bitcoin dropped sharply the day Google made its announcement of achieving Quantum Supremacy a year back. This is the Quantum Apocalypse.


The word is gearing up for this post-quantum world. Google, Microsoft, Intel and IBM are working on solutions, so are specialist startups like Post-Quantum and Quantinuum. The UK government claims that all its top-secret data is already ‘post-quantum’. The BBC talks of a ‘beauty parade’ taking place at the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST), “to establish a standardised defence strategy that will protect industry, government, academia and critical national infrastructure against the perils of the quantum apocalypse.” Formidable new cryptographic methods like quantum key distribution are being developed, where even if the message gets intercepted no one can read it, much like the aforementioned Cat

All of this will not be cheap, nor will it be easy. But we have no choice in the matter – most of our world runs digitally now, and its wheels need to be kept humming. And, to do that, we will need to think out of the Box.


Good insights Jaspreet Bindra, do agree with your analogy as there are many critical applications in every organization that will have to be audited to ensure that the encryption protecting them is secure. QC's are emerging and quickly, which will propagate the Y2Q threat to be imminent enough for organizations to look at their security postures in the near term. Securing your crown jewels is indeed important.

Like
Reply

Thought provoking piece! It is important to stay across this space... the risk might be low at the moment but this can really escalate very fast and if this risk materializes, impact will be in gigantic proportions as rightly called out.

Really serious matters of the future security .must read and know

One way for it to not be a problem is to have no need for encryption - nothing to hide or steal

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Jaspreet Bindra

  • Weekend Warp

    You did not hear me say it, but the last week was a slow one for AI! The holidays may have wound down, but AI's…

  • Year End Warp 2025

    2025: The Year AI Went From Hype to Horizon In technology, there are decades where nothing happens. And then there are…

  • Weekend Warp

    Ok, Sam Altman and OpenAI are back to headline Weekend Warp again. But, not in the way Altman would prefer.

  • Weekend Warp

    A shell-shocked Sam Altman and OpenAI tried capturing the initiative last week. And failed.

    1 Comment
  • Weekend Warp

    Despite Nvidia defying gravity once again, this week belonged to Google. And how.

  • Weekend Warp

    So, who knew that the simple and staid Sundar of Google had got Elon- envy? Even as Elon sends a rocket up almost every…

  • Weekend Warp

    Will 2026 be the Year of the Browser? It seems like that – first Perplexity with Comet, then Microsoft and Google…

  • Weekend Warp

    It is hard to argue with $15bn, so the top news of this week belongs to Google (not OpenAI, not Elon Musk, not even…

  • Weekend Warp

    This week was studded with news of AI companies and investors opening offices in India AI Literacy Goes Global! Pleased…

    3 Comments
  • Weekend Warp

    Ok, so a lot of stuff happened this week as AI drives itself into an even more manic frenzy My book "Winning with AI:…

Others also viewed

Explore content categories