It Know Everything About Programming — But Not How to Program: My Experience with Cursor AI

It Know Everything About Programming — But Not How to Program: My Experience with Cursor AI

AI tools like Cursor AI are changing how we code. They seem to know everything about programming — but sometimes, they still don’t know how to actually program.

After spending a lot of time working with Cursor AI, I wanted to share a few honest thoughts. I’m excited about what’s possible, but I also think we’re still far from letting tools like this replace real programmers.

First, where Cursor AI shines:

  • Speed: It can crank out code incredibly fast, making it great for exploring ideas or getting a head start.
  • Wide knowledge: It knows about libraries, APIs, and techniques I might not immediately think of.
  • Persistence: If you guide it, it keeps trying — which can be helpful when you’re stuck.
  • Fast progress: It's getting better all the time — the improvements over just a few months are real.

But here’s where things get tricky — and why we’re not close to replacing programmers yet:

Where Cursor AI struggles — and why humans still matter:

  1. It forgets the basics:
  2. It misses Programming 101 rules:
  3. No memory of our conversation:
  4. It struggles with UI logic:
  5. Frequent compilation errors:
  6. It doesn't think about the future:
  7. It makes reckless decisions without asking:
  8. Jumps to quick fixes without seeing the big picture:

The bottom line:

Working with Cursor AI is a lot of fun — but also a bit like working with a really smart but unpredictable intern. Sometimes it nails it, sometimes it breaks things in ways you didn’t expect.

Why I’m still optimistic:

Even with all these issues, the progress is amazing. I fully expect tools like this to get dramatically better in the coming months and years.

But for now?

  • AI is a tool, not a replacement.
  • It can make you faster, but only if you review everything carefully.
  • It can give you ideas, but you still need to be in charge of the final product.

If you’re trying Cursor AI or similar tools, my advice: enjoy the speed, but stay in the driver’s seat. The future is coming fast — and I’m excited to see where this goes


I'm curious to hear from others — what’s been your experience with AI coding tools like Cursor AI, Copilot, or others?

Have they made you faster? Or caused unexpected headaches? Let's share notes!

#AI #GenerativeAI #SoftwareEngineering #Coding #AIAssistant #CursorAI #CodeGeneration #FutureOfWork #Developers #TechInnovation

Nir Melamoud, this was a sharp and honest piece. What stood out is not just the tooling review, but the underlying tension between code execution and system reasoning. Cursor AI does not fail because it lacks syntax. It fails because it lacks abstraction, recursion, and judgment. The question for me is not whether it helps engineers write faster, but whether it enables better systems thinking across the stack. Does it reduce noise? Does it create fewer reversals? Does it reinforce or erode intentionality in architecture decisions? The real edge is not speed. It is the preservation of meaning as code compounds. Curious how you see this evolving once teams move from solo exploration to coordinated build with AI support.

We use AI as code review tool with some success, it does ok job of pointing more obvious things out and, what is more important, no offense can be taken 😅

Nir Melamoud love this article! Really highlights what AI will be good for but actually where it fails which no one talks about because of the 'AI hype'. Really surprised with it missing some of the basics, eye opener!

Thanks for sharing, somehow I would have expected greater reliability and predictability from AI even at this stage of maturity. Also intrigued by the reckless decision making....

Try Claude-Code... It's very expensive but it's gonna blow your mind

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Nir Melamoud

Others also viewed

Explore content categories