Issue #7
This week’s StructEd Bulletin highlights a new experimental study showing how thin‐walled open‐section steel beams resist “pure bending” far less cleanly than theory suggests. Even with shear‐center loading, small geometric imperfections and gravity‐induced torsion drove coupled local and global buckling, underscoring the limits of idealized bending‐only models. RISAConnection v17 also arrives with AISC 360‐22 support, expanded shape libraries, and improved HSS and base‐plate workflows. The featured case study reviews several welded‐steel failures where brittle fracture, hydrogen embrittlement, and heat‐affected‐zone microstructures dominated behavior — a reminder that modern alloys demand more careful weld preparation than traditional mild steels. Rounding out the issue are three free upcoming PDH sessions covering mass timber construction types, project‐management fundamentals, and advanced fire‐life‐safety design.
1. Code & Standards Watch
Updates & New Releases:
Working Sessions, Public Comment, & Balloting:
Latest Errata:
2. Research Snapshot
Researchers took on the challenge of trying to isolate pure bending (no torsion) in a thin-walled, open steel section, and experienced some difficulties. Despite a custom test rig intended to carefully load the section exactly in line with its shear center, minor imperfections in the material of the beam still presented noticeable torsional impacts.
Owing in part to the incidental torsion, the beam exhibited combined local & global buckling, and was very sensitive to boundary conditions and geometric accuracy. Sensitivity was so high, in fact, that torsion induced by the eccentricity of the self-weight of the section dominated behavior.
Key Takeaways: Any assumptions of pure bending should be taken skeptically when it comes to thin-walled, open sections, regardless of material. Idealized bending-only models with no consideration for torsion simply do not reflect reality in such sensitive situations, even under lab conditions.
3. Tools & Workflow
Recommended by LinkedIn
4. Case Study of the Week
Several real failures of welded steel structures, summarized in one convenient spot. Major recurring themes are hydrogen embrittlement from poor weld preparation, stresses induced by rapid heating/cooling of high-strength (higher carbon) alloys, and stress concentrations coinciding with these critical flaws
Key takeaways: AISC (and other prevalent steel codes) principally is calibrated for very mild steel alloys which are specifically formulated to be very ductile and forgiving of heat treatment abuses. Once more complex alloys are introduced, careful weld preparation is necessary, and stress concentration factors we otherwise can ignore (due to ductility) emerge to dominate behavior.
5. Upcoming Free Live PDH
6. Quick Hits
👋 From the Editor
I’m Eric, the engineer behind the StructEd Bulletin. I dig through stacks of journal articles and software patch notes to find useful information for practicing engineers and keep an eye on the scattered code updates & errata for you. I’m just getting started, so if you find this useful, the best way to support the newsletter is to share it with a colleague or post it on LinkedIn. It helps more than you’d think!
📬 Subscribe & Share
If someone forwarded this to you, you can subscribe here: 👉 https://structedbulletin.com
Know someone who’d appreciate this? Forward this post or share the link above.