From Vibe Coding to Spec-Driven Development
Google Gemini-generated

From Vibe Coding to Spec-Driven Development

Everyone knows what vibe coding is by now. That’s not the issue. The issue is that vibe-coded systems look successful right up until the moment they’re used by real people, under real constraints, in real production environments.

That’s not a tooling failure. That’s a process failure.

Let me explain why using a backyard.

Vibe Coding a Backyard

Imagine telling a contractor:

“Just build me something cool for grilling.”

You mention a BBQ, a burner, some cabinets, and counter space. No blueprint. No measurements. No sequencing.

What happens next is predictable:

  • The contractor fills in the gaps
  • A BBQ arrives—but there’s no cutout in the stone
  • Every change means tearing up what’s already built
  • On opening night, dinner fails because there’s no gas line or plumbing

It looks finished. It just doesn’t work.

That’s vibe coding.

Spec-ing a Backyard Instead

Now imagine saying:

“The blueprint is the source of truth.”

Before anything is built:

  • Exact appliance dimensions are locked
  • Interfaces for stone and cabinetry are defined
  • Gas, electric, and plumbing are laid before pavers
  • Contractors validate their work against spec sheets
  • A different mason could reproduce the same backyard tomorrow

The result?

  • Humans define what
  • Builders execute how
  • The system works the first time—and keeps working


Mapping the Backyard to Software

The analogy maps cleanly to software development:

Article content
Spec-drive SDLC

This is the difference between code that demos and code that survives.

Why Vibe Coding Is a One-Shot Strategy

Vibe coding optimizes for speed once, usually the first happy path.

It works best when:

  • The problem is small
  • The scope is fixed
  • The person generating the code is the same person maintaining it

As soon as any of those change, the cracks show.

In practice, vibe coding often results in:

  • No shared structure — patterns emerge accidentally, not intentionally
  • No explicit intent — the why lives in prompts, not in the system
  • Hallucinated files and assumptions — code written for systems that don’t exist
  • Misunderstood codebases — confident changes built on shallow context
  • Massive, unreviewable diffs — too big to reason about, too risky to merge

The core issue isn’t correctness. It’s recoverability.

A vibe-coded system is hard to extend, harder to review, and nearly impossible to safely change once the original mental model is gone.

It produces something that resembles software—until change arrives.

What Spec-Driven Development Actually Means

Spec-driven development flips the order. Instead of starting with files, frameworks, and functions, you start with intent:

  • What problem are we solving?
  • Who is it for?
  • What does “correct” look like?

From there, you write a natural-language specification that captures:

  • System behavior (what must happen)
  • Constraints (what must not happen)
  • Interfaces and contracts
  • Non-functional requirements (performance, security, reliability)
  • Acceptance criteria, using Gherkin format, that can be validated later

This spec becomes a shared artifact:

  • Reviewable by humans
  • Stable across implementations
  • Independent of language, framework, or tooling

Only after the spec is reviewed and refined do you move to implementation.

At that point, agents aren’t guessing intent—they’re executing it:

  • Generating code that conforms to defined contracts
  • Modifying existing systems without breaking assumptions
  • Producing smaller, reviewable diffs
  • Regenerating implementations across languages or stacks

In short:

  • Specs define what must be true
  • Agents implement how it becomes true
  • Humans stay in the loop where judgment matters most

This isn’t anti-AI. It’s how AI becomes reliable.

It’s how you turn non-deterministic generation into repeatable, production-grade systems.

The Real Shift

Vibe coding isn’t wrong. It’s just incomplete.

Specs turn non-deterministic generation into deterministic outcomes. They let creativity exist without sacrificing correctness.

If you wouldn’t pour concrete before reviewing a blueprint, don’t do it with your production systems either.

Vibes inspire. Specs ship.

You can see an evolving app following these principles at https://github.com/arun-gupta/agentic-tictactoe.

Love this concept - spec-driven development + coding agents + operational learnings is such a powerful combination. Funny enough, I was discussing something similar with a friend lately and we ended up coining the term “vibe producting” where you move from idea -> spec -> vibe coding -> testing -> deployements iteration very fluidly.

Like
Reply

Great presentation at Jfokus26 Arun 👏👏 I will definitely improve my AGENTS.md game after this one

As someone in tech without a technical background, I’m always grateful to Arun Gupta for being so good at explaining content in a way anyone can understand it and be excited by it.

I'm a strong believer that spec-driven development is the way things are going. Eventually, specs become the new source code.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Arun Gupta

  • Five Hard Things About Building Agentic Systems

    We’ve seen this before. When we moved from monoliths to microservices, we gained flexibility but also introduced…

    2 Comments
  • The Craft Didn't Disappear. It Moved.

    One of my main discussion points over the last several months has been this: If code writing is becoming a commodity…

    3 Comments
  • Leadership with Empathy and Candor

    Empathy gets talked about a lot in leadership. Often in ways that make it sound soft, optional, or secondary to…

    7 Comments
  • Slopen Source

    Open source has a new problem that is becoming increasingly visible. Call it Slopen Source.

    9 Comments
  • Delayed Baggage Syndrome

    The Making of a Mental Spiral On my trip from SFO to Amsterdam right now, my flight was delayed by an hour. It was…

    1 Comment
  • Practical Tips for Spec-Driven Development with AI Agents: What Works and What Doesn’t

    AI agents amplify both good and bad engineering practices. Specs, acceptance criteria, schemas, tests, and human…

    3 Comments
  • 1,500+ Miles: Choosing Healthspan Over Lifespan

    I’ve been running for a very long time. It’s always been part of my life — familiar, steady, almost background and…

    7 Comments
  • The New SDLC: Intent-Driven, Agent-Operated, Human-Directed

    I run with a vibe, but code with precision. In that gap lies the truth about what software engineering really demands.

    2 Comments
  • Re:Invent 2025: Future is Agentic, So Are We!

    #ReInvent 2025 is a wrap! I had a great time meeting JetBrains customers, partners, colleagues, and friends. It was…

    4 Comments
  • World Mental Health Day 2025

    World Mental Health Day is a reminder that mental well-being isn’t optional; it’s essential. The pace, pressure, and…

    3 Comments

Explore content categories