False Positives Aren’t the Problem — Bad Process Is
I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve seen alerts get dismissed as false positives — not because they were invalid, but because no one had the time, context, or process to deal with them properly.
We don’t have a false positive problem. We have a process problem.
When Everything Looks Noisy, You Tune It Out
Here’s a common scenario: PowerShell kicks off a suspicious child process. The alert fires. It’s closed almost instantly as a false positive.
Why? Not because it was analyzed, contextualized, or correlated — but because someone recognized the pattern, assumed it was benign, and moved on.
That’s not a confident decision — that’s survival mode.
The reality is:
The System Is the Problem
The issue isn’t the alert itself. It’s what we do (or don’t do) once it fires.
If your SOC doesn’t…
…then yeah — your metrics will show “false positives.” But that’s just what broken process looks like.
Recommended by LinkedIn
What Actually Works
I've spent most of my career building repeatable processes — not just because it’s efficient, but because it’s necessary. In security, we don't scale with headcount — we scale with clarity.
What’s worked:
It's Not About Fewer Alerts — It's About Better Decisions
You can’t eliminate noise. But you can design your system to surface the right signals at the right time.
If you're constantly calling things false positives, take a step back and ask:
Is the alert the problem — or is the process broken?
Let’s Talk Shop
If you’re building a process-driven SOC — one that learns and improves — I’d love to hear how you’re doing it.
What’s working? What’s still messy?