Evil Math & NPSH margin
Ok maybe not so evil, but I was struggling for a catchy title....
In my previous post I talked about Hydraulic Institute (HI) 9.6.1 (2017) and how it can help guide to selecting the appropriate NPSH margin for your pump application.
However some applications are not covered by the standard (such as water injection). Additionally I know some people might want a more math based approach to margin determination. So fear not. If you are one of those people who enjoy some non-evil math, read on.
The formula I'm going to cover is a simplification of the one we use internally. I've tried to spare you the reader the need to wade through several different charts and extrapolate between them. If you are concerned that your application falls outside the limits of the formula, feel free to contact me and I can give you more specific guidance.
So onto the formula, which is applicable for pumps pumping water and operating in the POR (Preferred Operating Range of 70% to 120% of BEP) with a Nss of 11,000 US (231 metric) or less. It requires that you know 3 pieces of information:
Note that MNPSH is expressed as a non dimensional number.
Recommended by LinkedIn
The formula reflects the general sensitivity of pumps to the velocity at the impeller eye. It is well established that pumps with very high eye velocities ( > 80 ft/s, 24 m/s) require significant NPSH margins. ( I'd encourage you to try the different eye velocity values and see the effect on recommended margin).
Ok so now for a worked example to show you the formula in action:
The example is a pump @ 3560 RPM with an eye diameter (D1) of 7 inches (178mm) and a NPSHr of 26 ft. (7.9m)
u1 = π * 3560 * 7 / 720 = 109 ft./s
Putting this into the formula gives:
So in this application the required NPSH margin is 1.91 and the hence the recommended NPSHa is 1.91 * 26 = 49.7 ft.
I'd encourage you to take a look at any problem pumps you have in your installation and evaluate them where appropriate using this formula or HI 9.6.1. You may find it a useful tool in judging the quality of the installation and help guide as to whether insufficient NPSH margin is a contributor to the pump's reliability.
Any feedback is as always gratefully received.
Beatus Centrifuga
Thanks!, Simon Bradshaw what needs to be change to apply this formula for refined hidrocarbons such as Diesel and for crude oil?
Hi simon, just saw your comment with a link to this article. Thank you for that. Just a question -- what if 2 pumps are connected in series. How could we calculate if cavitation will occur on the second pump? Would a turbulent flow on the impeller eye cause cavitation?
Simon, two more questions: 1.What do you think about defining operation zones for Crude Oil pipeline pumps (BB3), according to Process Industry Practice PIP RECP001 (Nss vs. %BEP)? 2. Is it possible to use your formula for viscous products (crude oils)? What is it needed to use with crude oil? Thanks!
Simon, How I can to apply the NPSH margin formula for a double-entry impeller?
Interesting many thanks