Engineering The Queen's Gambit
Photo: Netflix

Engineering The Queen's Gambit

Perhaps you have watched, as I have, the show The Queen’s Gambit on Netflix and have been intrigued by the game of Chess enough to have at least thought you would like to play. It goes without saying that with the show there may be a resurgence in Chess players from around the world; collectively will be a good thing for our society.

Chess is something that I have made a habit of for a long time. It requires sometimes immense concentration and is always hungry for critical thinking skills. It is, for me, as much of a tool for developing thinking skills as it is a game with one winner and one loser (or sometimes no winner or loser). 

The show tells the story of Beth Harmon, a chess savant (Beth is not a real historical character) who wows the world with her skills in beating Grandmasters. Perhaps when we think of historical chess Grandmasters, we think of Fischer, Capablanca, Spassky, and Kasparov, all chess geniuses. Nevertheless, I also think that each of these people did not just wake up one day with a gift (although they were gifted), it was something they developed through time, practice, and patience.

Bobby Fischer Playing Chess

“Chess demands total concentration” – Bobby Fischer

Whenever I speak to young people about the skills they need to hone to become great data scientists, engineers, or information technology professionals, I implore them to add chess to their routine. I ask this because chess shares the same discipline it takes to solve complex problems and developing these skills is not just limited to study, classes, and trial by error. Why not fill your toolbox with as many tools as you have available to you?

The Queen’s Gambit is a popular opening chess move (d4 d5, c4), and defending it is something that is in the repertoire of every good chess player. And I’m extending the invitation to you to utilize this most underrated way of developing skills you need to hone and maintain to be successful in an engineering discipline. 

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Rachel Clark

  • The Case for Living Defense

    Why Cyber Defense Needs an Architecture That Can Think, Doubt, and Refuse SKADI Cyber Defense | Founder’s Essay By…

  • Why Metacognition Is the Missing Layer in Cyber Defense

    The Problem Nobody Talks About Every SIEM, every XDR, every detection platform on the market today does the same thing:…

    1 Comment
  • The Bouncer, the Guard Dog, and the Un-Brainwashable Dog

    There is a question that has been quietly eating at cybersecurity for thirty years, and most people in the industry…

    1 Comment
  • LLMs Cannot Keep Up with the Pace of Cybercrime

    There is a fundamental mismatch at the heart of most AI-powered cybersecurity products, and almost no one is talking…

    2 Comments
  • Canadian Security Belongs in Canada

    Most Canadian executives I speak with share the same assumption: if your cybersecurity vendor stores your data in…

    6 Comments
  • 2026 Cybersecurity: The Year the SOC Either Evolves or Drowns

    Every December, the industry releases prediction reports. Most of them recycle the same warnings: ransomware will…

  • Why Threat Actors Cannot Build Ontology

    Security discussions often frame ontology as a defensive advantage, but the more interesting question is what it looks…

  • The 67 Percent Problem Gets Worse in 2026

    Anyone who has spent time in a security operations center already knows the number. In 2023, Vectra AI surveyed…

    1 Comment
  • The 67% Problem

    Why Human SOC Analysts Are Fighting a Losing Battle, And What the Data Says About a Better Way Forward. There is a…

    3 Comments
  • The Death of Correlation Analytics: What's Really Under the Hood

    When I tell security engineers that correlation analytics are dying, I often get pushback. They point to their SIEM…

    6 Comments

Others also viewed

Explore content categories