Blockchain technology is a trust machine
Author: James Catania - CEO Intelliblock - info@intelliblock.net
According to one critic, "Ad-tech [programmatic] is allowing criminals to steal our personal information and governments to spy on us by tapping into marketing data". It is destroying our trust in the news and repulsing our customers. "US advertising trade associations have just joined the Trump administration in calling for the rejection of an FCC regulation created to protect consumers by restricting the collection and sharing of personal data by internet service providers such as Comcast and AT&T.
The blockchain is in effect a ‘trust machine’ and it threatens anyone in the ‘trust business’ These companies are so large and powerful, they seem un-assailable.Google, for example, has been described as "the least disruptable" business in media. Last year, it dropped its prices by 11% and still increased its revenue 22%. But when brands, governments or politicians lose the trust of their audience, they put themselves in grave danger. And it’s worse if there is, say, a new technology coming up, every bit as revolutionary as the sharing economy but twice as trustworthy.
Well, guess what? - There is.
The blockchain – an apparently mundane process that drives crypto-currency Bitcoin – is in effect a "trust machine". And it threatens anyone in the "trust business". Institutions and bureaucracies such as banks, clearing houses and government authorities, as well as sharing platforms such as Facebook and Twitter – all businesses that capture most of the profits of the platforms they operate.
Blockchain is a shared and trusted public ledger. With no centralised server, software applications are run on a peer-to-peer network of computers not controlled by any single party. This means they can be used to co-ordinate the activities of a large number of individuals, who can organise themselves without the help of a third party.
Don’t confuse this with crowdsourcing, which really is just a trendy way to beg for money from your friends. In the case of blockchain, people who contribute to a platform can actually benefit from the success of that platform.
Let’s say you want to sell your house.You can register it on a blockchain-operated platform for free.Your house will become visible to all users connected to the network. Once a buyer agrees the price for your house, an escrow account is created on the blockchain that requires two out of three people (ie the buyer, the seller and a potential third-party arbitrator) to agree for the funds to be released (a so-called multi-signature account). Once the buyer has sent the payment to the account, you hand over the keys.After receiving the house keys, the buyer releases the funds from the escrow account.
Only if there is an issue between the two does the system require the intervention of a third party (a randomly selected arbitrator) to decide whether to release the payment to the seller or whether to return the money to the buyer.
Think about that. No estate agents, no Rightmove and no bank required. In short, no middle man needed at all.Blockchain can work for ecommerce (OpenBazaar), taxi-hailing (Lazooz or ArcadeCity) and social media (Akasha, Steem.io or Synereo). It could also challenge Spotify and Airbnb, which recently advertised to recruit blockchain experts.You may say that blockchain does not sound very convenient, and that is possibly the case (but this could be easily fixed).
But what you can’t say is that you can’t trust it. Blockchain is 100% trustworthy – because that is what it is for. It is a trust machine.
If other media brands cannot act in a trustworthy way, that will become a benefit that trumps all.
James, i have now been following blockchain for quite some time now but although I'm not yet fully familair with the subject I beleive that more information on its uses, white papers, test cases and were it can help the general society would defently initiate hype and discussion. Additionaly most people only think of crypto such as Bitcoin when it comes to blockchain but this is not neccesserelly the case. I beleive that more information on the underlying foundation levels of such technology should be made available.