The age of creativity is over

The age of creativity is over

Lots of companies are focused on doing what they do better. This is a noble goal, you might think. And that’s true, as long as this pursuit doesn’t exclude an even more critical challenge: asking the question, “should we even be doing it?”

I spent another fascinating day at Accenture’s The Dock recently, a facility in Dublin that is packed with a diverse range of business, technology, and most importantly, social and cultural thinkers. This is where Accenture’s clients take their existential problems and get support in exploring them. In conversation The Dock’s director, Ryan Shanks, encapsulated perfectly an issue that I have been battling since I founded this practice six years ago: “Many of our clients are focused on operational excellence. That means the age of creativity is over.”

If you are frequent reader of this blog, or listener to my podcast, you will be aware that I believe we are in an age of high frequency change. I don’t believe change in the grand scheme is faster or slower now. But that there is a new class of small but impactful and highly accelerated waves of change that will ultimately present an existential threat to every organisation. In this age, it is critical that every leader who wants to build sustainable success – who prizes stewardship over short-term wins – focuses on adaptation not optimisation. That they recognise that while wastefulness is never good, long term success will require rapid change to fit the market, rather than endless refinements to today’s model.

Shanks’ statement focuses on a critical aspect of this adaptation: creativity. I’ll be referring to it in my upcoming talk at the Association of Colleges conference on the future of education. Creativity is one of those words that gets bandied about meaninglessly like ‘innovation’ and ‘disruption’. Without qualification of what we mean by creativity, or how that creativity is to be directed, I think calls for more of it have little value.

Creativity is often misunderstood. It is overly associated with the arts, and art in particular. Those who didn’t take to art or creative writing at school may not consider themselves creative. But creativity is problem solving. It is often not about originality but transposition and iteration, bringing ideas from one place and applying them in a different context then refining them over a period until they fulfil a need. The arts are a great place to learn these skills, but they are not their only outlet.

In an age of high frequency change we need open minded, wide ranging, creativity applied across our organisations. A constant challenge to our processes, propositions and behaviours, and new ideas instituted, revised, and applied.

This type of creativity is a skill, one that can be learned and that must be honed. This process is an unalloyed good for individuals and has enormous benefits for our organisations. It is something that deserves our investment.

##

First published on tomcheesewright.com. If you want to get all my articles in your inbox each week, subscribe at https://tomcheesewright.com/subscribe/


Makes sense to me Tom. Big organisations certainly like low risk and can stifle people’s creative impulses

Like
Reply

The opportunity as I see it is to bridge the gap between "creatives" and "optimisers" to harness both skillsets to solve problems and drive growth. The challenge is overcoming the dogma driven by those with a vested interest in selling one or the other.

So it’s not the end of creativity. It’s the opposite. It’s creativity just like ‘digital’ being used as a tool by everyone. One word is design democracy. Others call it cross-disciplinary. All this says it’s that skills are not siloed anymore or shouldn’t be. Yes all are tools for problem solving and anyone can learn any skill. What we need to change is the perception that any skill can’t be learned by everyone. That’s Industrial Age thinking and it has to stop. Good stuff. Check out my long-winded blueprint. http://www.thedeconstructionparadigm.com

The problem is that in most companies making a mistake is deadly, to not move or to move super slow is not. That kills creativity, there is no reward in cooperation.

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Tom Cheesewright

  • Can we be more specific about the risks from AI?

    I got one of those calls from the BBC earlier this week. "The Prime Minister has said.

    8 Comments
  • The New Hot Rods

    This is the car I’m building. It looks like a 1950s roadster.

    9 Comments
  • Future energy: The medium is the message

    If I say the word ‘battery’, I know the image that will pop into your head. It will probably be a little cylindrical…

    3 Comments
  • Raging against the invisible machine

    Today we use the word Luddite to describe someone who is nonplussed by technology. Someone who just doesn’t like it…

  • Two steps forward, one step back

    Driving through the Italian countryside on the way back to Rome’s Ciampino airport, an ancient aqueduct becomes visible…

    1 Comment
  • Save your career. Get a new hobby

    Up there with the most frequent questions I am asked is this: “What should I be teaching my children to give them the…

  • Brexit & the two Canutes

    Amazingly, it was September this year before a client first asked me, formally, to look at Brexit. It has inevitably…

    1 Comment
  • Transport technology has shaped our cities, and will continue shape them in the future

    The modern motor car is really only 80 years old, or thereabouts. It was in the inter-war period that we settled on the…

  • We need to differentiate between future jobs and future work

    There are many estimates of how many jobs might be susceptible to automation in the coming decade. Even those at the…

    5 Comments
  • Is our future fractured or diverse?

    Who are you? How is that identity defined? What groups do you associate with? And which ones do you define yourself…

Others also viewed

Explore content categories