From T-shaped to M-shaped learning in software engineering

I used to hear a lot about T-shaped engineers. Go deep in one skill, and have a basic understanding of others. Makes sense. But lately, I’ve been thinking in real-world engineering, it’s slowly shifting beyond that. 👉 From T-shaped → to something closer to M-shaped learning Because today, systems are not built in isolation. For example, in backend development : • Going deep into Java and Spring Boot is important • but backend doesn’t work without databases • APIs directly connect with frontend systems • and deployment + infrastructure affect real-world behavior So one depth is often not enough. Not expert in everything , but not limited to just one vertical either. The interesting part is: 👉 The shape doesn’t matter as much as the thinking behind it • Depth helps you solve complex problems • Breadth helps you understand how systems actually work end-to-end • And better understanding leads to better decisions And real-world engineering is full of decisions. Lately, I’ve been trying to balance both: • going deeper into backend systems • while expanding understanding of system design and how different parts connect Still figuring this out, but this feels closer to how modern engineering works. Curious, Do you think being T-shaped is still enough, or is M-shaped becoming more relevant? #softwareengineering #backenddevelopment #systemdesign #learning #developers #decisions

  • diagram

Tried visualizing how engineering is shifting from isolated skills to connected systems.

Like
Reply

This is such a relevant take for modern engineering.It’s not just about mastering one area anymore, but also knowing how everything works together.

well articulated and easy to understand

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories