Vinay Kumar’s Post

Java just made the thread pool obsolete. For 25+ years, we've been told: "Threads are expensive. Don't block. Use reactive programming." Java 21's Virtual Threads just flipped that wisdom on its head. 🧵 Here's what changed: OLD WORLD: • Platform threads = ~1MB each • Cap of ~thousands of threads • Blocking IO = wasted resources • Solution: Complex reactive code, thread pools, async/await NEW WORLD: • Virtual threads = ~1KB each • MILLIONS of threads possible • Blocking IO = no problem • Solution: Simple, readable, synchronous code The magic? Virtual threads unmount from their carrier when they block. The carrier thread immediately runs another virtual thread. When IO completes, remount and continue. REAL IMPACT: Before: ```java ExecutorService pool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(200); // Carefully tuned. Blocking ties up precious threads. ``` After: ```java Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor() // Spawn 100,000 tasks? No problem. ``` WHY THIS MATTERS FOR YOUR BACKEND: → Spring Boot apps handling 10,000+ concurrent requests → No more callback hell or reactive complexity → Better observability (real stack traces!) → Write code humans can actually read One config change in Spring Boot 3.2+: `spring.threads.virtual.enabled=true` That's it. Your blocking code suddenly scales 10-100x. CAVEATS: • CPU-bound work? Still needs real threads • Using synchronized blocks? Refactor to ReentrantLock • Not a silver bullet, but solves 80% of backend concurrency Java borrowed the best ideas from Go's goroutines and Erlang's processes, wrapped them in JVM maturity. Project Loom didn't just add a feature. It brought simplicity back to concurrent programming. If you're building microservices, APIs, or high-traffic systems in Java, this changes everything. What's your experience with Virtual Threads? Seeing real-world benefits? #Java #VirtualThreads #ProjectLoom #BackendDevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #Scalability

  • No alternative text description for this image

No, thread pools are no less important than before. And, actually, you're still living in the old "thread per request" world.

Praveen V. To the best of my knowledge, the only implementation of the functional style Promises is my Pragmatica Lite library. Vert.x uses Mutiny library, but it's a reactive streams type of library/API. The main difference is the push vs pull processing model. Reactive streams are using a pull model with all consequences: backpressure, subscriptions, etc.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories