Your Spring Boot project structure reveals your skill level. Yes. Immediately. When I started building backend projects, my structure looked like this: • controller • service • repository • model That’s it. It worked. But it wasn’t scalable. Then I started asking better questions: • Where do I put business logic properly? • How do I separate DTOs from entities? • Where should validation live? • What happens when the project grows to 50+ APIs? That’s when I stopped structuring projects for “today” and started structuring them for “future growth”. Now I think in terms of: • Feature-based packaging (not layer chaos) • Clear separation of concerns • DTO ↔ Mapper ↔ Entity flow • Centralized exception handling • Config separation • Clean naming conventions Because messy structure doesn’t fail at 5 APIs. It fails at 50. If you’re learning Spring Boot: Don’t just make it work. Make it maintainable. Day 2 of becoming production-ready with Spring Boot. How do you structure your backend projects? #Java #SpringBoot #BackendEngineering #CleanArchitecture #FullStackDeveloper
But if you are working on microservices both can be scalable Insert of making monolithic make a microservices project you can as scale as you want it's didn't matter you named it service or userservice package Just create name of main package as that microservices name like if it's for auth name it IAM service Then it's didn't matter it's inside use or align with other package like controller, entity or many more Make api handler and api gateway so it can with with as many api you want
Try this 3 golden Rules - to achieves the next level of readability - so that your code tells a customer story. 1. Packages should never depend on sub-packages. 2. Sub-packages should not introduce new concepts, just more details. 3. Packages should reflect business-concepts, not technical ones. It's fine to use subpackages within other packages, as long as they aren't at the same hierarchy level. Be mindful of cyclic dependencies. The trick is to focus on the level "0" by placing the classes (interfaces/abstract classes/value objects/entities) of the main concepts there (without technical clutter). The packages then provide the implementations for these concepts. Example [app-name] ├── src/ | ├─ application/ | ├─ customer/ | ├─ payment/ | ├─ inventory/ | ├─ shipping/ | ├─ user/ | ├─ Customer.java | ├─ Product.java | ├─ Products.java | ├─ Order.java | ├─ Orders.java | ├─ Payment.java | ├─ Shipment.java | └─ ShopApplication.java Can you see what the above app is about? https://www.garudax.id/pulse/decorator-pattern-where-business-logic-meets-clean-code-wagner-b8xbf