A closure isn't a concept to memorize. It's something your code is already doing. Most developers hear the word "closure" and immediately feel behind. They're not. They've been writing closures since day one. Take a look at the image below. That inner function has no variable of its own — but it remembers the one from the outer scope, even after the outer function has finished running. Not a copy. A live reference. Which is why the value keeps updating across calls instead of resetting to zero. That's the whole mechanism. That's a closure. You've already used this pattern without knowing the name: → Debounce and throttle utilities → Event handlers that track state between calls → React's useState — built on this exact idea The concept was never the hard part. The word made it sound harder than it is. Once you see it — you'll start spotting closures in code you wrote years ago. #JavaScript #WebDev #FrontendDevelopment #ReactJS #Programming
If you’re inadvertibly relying on closures without knowing what their name or implication is, maybe it’s time to grow a pair of eyes and read the 101 of JavaScript.
Closures and generators are often confused, but this example explains the difference really well 👍
I’m probably wrong on this, but I feel like closures are just OOP with extra steps.
Staff / Principal Fullstack Engineer | Building Scalable Web and Mobile Solutions
3wIt would be more useful to mention closure always together with the scope chain.