Why I practice reading code more than writing it. We spend so much time learning how to build things from scratch. How to write a new API. How to design a new feature. How to choose the perfect framework. These are necessary skills. But when you join a team or start a real project, you realize something quickly: You aren't writing new code from scratch very often. The vast majority of backend engineering isn't about innovation; it’s about maintenance and evolution. A system that works in production for five years is a living organism. It’s: 1️⃣ Messy 2️⃣ Patched 3️⃣ Under-documented Written by six people who are no longer at the company That system is the reality of the job. If you can only build from zero, you’re missing 70% of what’s required to be effective. The real "multiplier skill" isn't writing clever code. It's the ability to quickly read and understand a system you didn't build. When I am looking at a legacy codebase, I don't just ask what the code does. I ask: Why was this designed this way? (Context is everything) What assumptions were made about the data flow? How does this small change impact the entire system performance? The engineer who can reverse-engineer a system by reading the code is the engineer who can: - Debug problems they’ve never seen before. - Add new features without breaking existing ones. - Earn the trust of the team the fastest. Don't just practice writing. Practice deciphering. Read open-source libraries. Study architectures you don't use. Ask yourself why that one bizarre line of code exists (spoiler: it's probably because of a very specific production bug). What is one skill besides writing code that you believe makes an engineer invaluable? 👇 I’m Joseph. And I share technical backend stories and insights to help you build better systems (and read the existing ones). #backend #softwareengineering #codebase #legacycode #careeradvice #debugging #systemdesign #technicalskills
Reading Code is a Crucial Skill for Backend Engineers
More Relevant Posts
-
As a software engineer, your biggest enemy isn't bugs — it's context switching. ⚡ Here's how I use Claude daily to stay in flow and ship faster: ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔍 Debug smarter, not harder Paste a stack trace and ask "what's causing this and how do I fix it?" — Claude explains the root cause AND suggests the fix. No more 30-minute StackOverflow rabbit holes. 📝 Write docs you'll actually write "Write a README for this function" → done in 30 seconds. I paste the code, Claude writes clean, professional documentation. I just review and commit. 🔄 Code reviews on demand Before opening a PR, I run my diff through Claude: "Review this for bugs, edge cases, and readability." It catches things I miss. Every time. 🧪 Test generation "Write unit tests for this function covering happy path and edge cases." What used to take 20 minutes now takes 2. 📧 Communicate like a senior Struggling to word a technical tradeoff in a Jira ticket or Slack message? Claude helps me write clearly so PMs and stakeholders actually understand what I'm saying. 💡 Learn faster "Explain Redis pub/sub in plain English, then show me a Python example." Perfect for picking up new tech without reading a full doc. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ The engineers I see leveling up fastest aren't writing more code. They're thinking more clearly — and using the right tools to remove friction. Claude has quietly become the tool I open more than any IDE plugin. What's your go-to AI use case as a dev? Drop it below 👇 #SoftwareEngineering #AI #Claude #DeveloperProductivity #Coding #TechTips #Programming
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Some thing which is very underrated and actually important in software engineering is code deletion. YES, not creating new code, but code deletion. Deleting code is one of the most important things I learned during my journey of writing production code. As a junior, I thought my job was adding features. Every edge case got a new function. Years later, that codebase was an unmaintainable nightmare. Over time, I have realized that the best engineers aren't writing the most code, but they're deleting it. Our team once built a report exporter for PDF, Excel, CSV, JSON, and XML. Logs showed 99% of users only used PDF and Excel. The three unused formats took up 40% of the module's code and maintenance overhead. Despite team's pushback ("What if someone needs XML?"), we deleted them. We cut the module size by 40%, halved our bug rate, and shipped 30% faster. Not a single user noticed. Codebases fail because they have too many features. Obsolete features and "just in case abstractions" still require maintenance. Every line of code is a liability. It can break, it needs testing, and it adds complexity. The best code is no code. There are signs that one can look out for to decide whether you should delete code: - Low usage: Less than 5% adoption after six months. - Forgotten origins: You have to dig through git history to understand why it exists. - Spaghetti logic: It scatters if statements across the codebase. - Test bloat: The tests are more complex than the implementation. - Fear: Developers avoid touching it because it might break. I now do a quarterly codebase purge, where in lookout for unused features. There are expected pushback: "We might need it." - It’s in Git. You can bring it back in an hour. "We spent time on it." - Sunk cost fallacy. "It’s not hurting anything." - It is. It makes the system harder to maintain. Your job as an engineer isn't just to write code. It is to solve problems. That often means deleting code to make systems simpler and more reliable. Next time you're about to add a feature, ask yourself: "Do I really need a new functionality OR can we enhance on the existing functionality.?" #coding #softwaredev #software #production
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I realised something uncomfortable recently: I don’t fully understand our own codebase. Over the past few months, our team has been shipping faster than ever: big architectural changes, constant infra evolution, rapid iteration, etc. On the surface, that’s great. But it came with a hidden cost: a growing knowledge gap. Person A owns one part of the system. Person B owns another. Even in a small team, we’ve started losing visibility into each other’s work. And it’s not just about ownership, it’s also about missing context. A lot of decisions live only in people’s heads: - Why didn’t we use Redis here? - Why a service bus instead of something simpler? - Why SMB over NFS? - Why this specific machine type? - Why is the system designed this way? These sound like simple questions, but without context, they’re incredibly hard to answer. Now combine that with: - Sparse logging - Little to no documentation The impact shows up quickly: - Debugging becomes guesswork - Logs don’t tell the full story - Systems feel like black boxes And more importantly, it creates real risk. If a couple of engineers leave, a new person joining the team is left reverse-engineering decisions that were never written down. (That's why I built LoRe last Sunday. 🙃 ) So I suggested something simple: a knowledge-sharing session. No slides. No formalities. Just open conversations where we walk each other through systems, flows, and decisions, including the why, not just the what. Speed without shared context is fragile. Now I strongly believe this: Every team should invest in knowledge sharing at least once every two weeks. It doesn’t have to be rigid. Pick a topic. Break it down together. Ask questions. Because good engineering isn’t just about building systems. It’s about making sure those systems can be understood, maintained, and evolved by others. And that only happens when knowledge is shared, not siloed. > I think the Grug-brained developer's guide describes this well.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most developers start out focused on writing clean code. That’s natural. You’re learning, you want to get things right, and you expect clear instructions to execute. But the shift from junior to senior isn’t about writing better code alone. It’s about ownership. At some point, you stop waiting for perfectly defined tasks and start asking: What problem are we actually solving? What’s the best way to solve it, regardless of the stack? A lot of juniors chase the next trending framework, thinking that’s the upgrade path. In reality, growth comes from zooming out. There’s also a common myth that more years of coding automatically make you a senior. That’s not how it works. You can code for years and still operate like someone who just executes tasks. The real shift is in how you think. A junior asks what to build. A senior asks why it needs to be built at all. A junior focuses on finishing tickets. A senior questions the ticket, improves it, and sees problems before they show up. Start owning a piece of the product. Understand how things move beyond your code editor: CI/CD pipelines, containerization, system design, scaling, reliability. Learn how Docker works in production. Get familiar with Kubernetes. Understand CDNs, API rate limiting, database sharding. Use GitHub like a collaboration tool, not just a place to push code. Senior engineers are not valued because they write more code. They are valued because they make better decisions. And those decisions shape the product, the team, and the business. If you want to level up, stop thinking only like a developer. Start thinking like an owner.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Let’s understand something most developers ignore in the beginning… Clean code. When you start coding, your only goal is: “Make it work.” And that’s fine at the start. But in real-world development, “working code” is not enough. 🔹 The Real Problem Messy code works… Until: • You need to debug • You need to scale • You need to add features • Someone else reads your code Then everything becomes difficult. 🔹 What is Clean Code? Clean code means: → Easy to read → Easy to understand → Easy to maintain → Easy to scale Not just for you… but for any developer. 🔹 Common Bad Practices • Long and complex functions • Poor variable naming • Repeating the same logic • No structure • Mixing everything in one file This creates confusion and bugs. 🔹 How I Write Clean Code 1. Meaningful Naming Variables and functions should explain themselves. Bad: x, data1 Good: userData, getUserProfile 2. Small Functions Each function should do one thing only. Short and focused = easy to manage 3. Avoid Repetition (DRY Principle) Don’t repeat logic again and again. Reuse code. 4. Proper Structure Organize files clearly: Controllers Services Utils Components 5. Write Readable Code Code should look simple. If it’s hard to read… it’s hard to maintain. 🔹 Developer Mindset Always think: “If someone else reads this code… will they understand it easily?” 🔹 Real Insight You don’t get paid for writing code. You get paid for writing maintainable code. Follow for more real-world Full Stack insights. If you want scalable and clean applications, let’s build it the right way. #CleanCode #FullStack #MERNStack #WebDevelopment #DeveloperJourney #PersonalBranding
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Code should help the next developer, not impress them 😇 Early in my career, I used to feel proud writing clever one-liners, deep abstractions, “smart” patterns. Now I actively avoid them. Because the next developer doesn’t care how smart you are. They care how fast they can safely make a change. And here’s the uncomfortable truth: Most “impressive” code is written for the developer’s ego, not the system’s need. Good code: • Uses boring, predictable patterns • Makes intent obvious without explanation • Avoids unnecessary abstractions • Trades cleverness for clarity Bad code often hides behind: • Over-optimization • Fancy patterns with no real need • “Future-proofing” that never gets used The best compliment your code can get is not: “Wow, this is genius.” It’s: “I understood this in one go.” ⸻ After 12 years, this is the shift: From writing code that works ➡️ to writing code that others can work with Because software is not a solo performance. It’s a long-term collaboration. So next time before you commit, ask yourself: “Am I making this easier for the next person… or just trying to look smart?”
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Key Concepts in Backend Engineering for Beginners I remember my first week as a Backend Engineer, feeling overwhelmed by the complexity of APIs. I made the rookie mistake of thinking they were just "glue" holding everything together. Spoiler: they're way more than that! It took some deep dives and a few frustrating hours to fully grasp their power and importance. Understanding backend engineering concepts is crucial for anyone stepping into this field, especially when it comes to building scalable and maintainable systems. It’s not just about writing code; it’s about creating the foundation for everything your application will do. 🔹 API Fundamentals APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) allow different software applications to communicate. They’re the bridge between frontend and backend, and understanding how they work is essential. Picture this: without APIs, your beautiful user interface would be like a car without an engine—attractive but completely non-functional. 🔹 Data Management Databases are where your application’s data lives, and knowing how to design and manage them is critical. I once spent countless hours optimizing a slow database query that was dragging down the entire application. It taught me that good structure and indexing are pivotal for performance. 🔹 Authentication & Security Ensuring your application is secure is non-negotiable. I learned this the hard way when I neglected to implement proper authentication in a personal project. A simple oversight led to unauthorized access, reminding me just how vital security measures are in any backend system. 🔹 Server Management Whether you're using cloud services or on-premise servers, knowing how to manage them effectively is key. I had my share of late-night panic over server downtimes. Learning to set up proper monitoring and alerting systems was a game-changer for keeping services running smoothly. 🔹 Code Quality & Testing Finally, writing maintainable and testable code can save you from future headaches. I once found myself knee-deep in a debugging session that could've been avoided with proper unit tests. Making sure your code is clean and well-documented not only helps you but also your team when they take over. Every day in this field presents new challenges, but these core concepts have shaped my approach to backend engineering. It’s fascinating how each piece connects to create something greater. As you reflect on your journey in backend engineering, what's one concept you wish you had grasped sooner? #BackendEngineering #APIDesign #DataManagement #Security #CodeQuality
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The 2026 Roadmap: From "Coder" to "Architect" 🚀 The definition of a "Great Software Developer" has fundamentally changed. In an era of AI-generated snippets and automated testing, the syntax is the easy part. The strategy is where you win. If you want to reach the top 1%, focus on these three non-obvious shifts: 1. Mastering "Problem Decomposition" Before you touch a keyboard, can you break a complex business requirement into its smallest logical parts? The Skill: Being able to explain the architecture to a non-technical stakeholder. The Result: You build what is needed, not just what is asked for. 2. Debugging the "Mental Model" First The best developers don't just fix the error message; they find the flaw in the logic that allowed the error to exist. The Shift: Stop asking "How do I fix this?" and start asking "Why did my assumption about this system fail?" 3. The "Human-Centric" Codebase Code is written for humans to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute. The Rule: If a junior developer can’t understand your "clever" solution in 30 seconds, it’s not a good solution. The Goal: Write code that is maintainable, not just functional. The Bottom Line: Tools will change. Frameworks will disappear. But the ability to think logically, communicate clearly, and empathize with the end-user is a permanent competitive advantage. What is the one skill you’re doubling down on this year? Let’s discuss in the comments. 👇 #SoftwareDevelopment #CareerGrowth #TechLeadership #CodingMindset #SoftwareEngineering w3schools.com JavaScript Mastery
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Most beginner developers focus on writing code. But real developers focus on fixing mistakes. Here are 5 mistakes I made while building real-world projects — and how I fixed them: 1️⃣ Overcomplicating state I used deeply nested state objects. Result → bugs everywhere. Fix → flattened the structure and simplified updates. 2️⃣ Not planning data flow I focused too much on UI components. Fix → designed the data model first. 3️⃣ Ignoring error handling Everything worked… until it didn’t. Fix → added proper try/catch and fallback states. 4️⃣ Copy-pasting code Felt fast at first. Later → became messy and hard to maintain. Fix → created reusable functions and components. 5️⃣ Not testing edge cases Worked fine with normal inputs. Broke with unexpected ones. Fix → tested empty, invalid, and large data. Biggest lesson: Good code isn’t about writing more — it’s about writing smarter. If you're learning development, focus on fixing mistakes — that’s where real growth happens. #webdevelopment #reactjs #coding #softwareen
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The "Iceberg" of Clean Code 🧊 Most people believe Clean Code = 👉 Descriptive variable names + Indentation But in reality, writing maintainable software is about what happens below the surface. 💡 The real "Clean Code" includes: Readability: Can a junior dev understand this at 2 AM? Scalability: Can we add features without a total rewrite? Testing: Unit tests that actually catch bugs, not just "pass." Error Handling: Meaningful logs instead of catch (e) { console.log(e) }. Consistency: Following the team’s pattern, even if you hate it. Performance: Choosing the right algorithm over the "clever" one. Documentation: Explaining the why, not just the what. Security: Sanitizing inputs and protecting sensitive data. Refactoring: Leaving the codebase better than you found it. 👉 Being a "Clean Coder" isn't about writing perfect code on the first try... It’s about writing code that is easy to change when requirements inevitably break. 📌 The goal: Don't just make it work. Make it last. If you’re building a project today, don't just optimize for the compiler—optimize for the humans who will read it next year (including you!). 🌍 #FullStack #WebDevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #DevOps #Cloud #Programming #Developers #LearningJourney
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore related topics
- Key Skills for Backend Developer Interviews
- Steps to Become a Back End Developer
- Top Skills Needed for Software Engineers
- Backend Developer Interview Questions for IT Companies
- Why Debugging Skills Matter More Than Copy-Pasting Code
- Refactoring Legacy Code as a Software Engineer
- Learning Path for Aspiring Backend Developers
- Why Human Skills Matter in Code Debugging
- Coding Mindset vs. Technical Knowledge in Careers
- Reasons to Start Coding Early in Your Career
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development