Java 17 vs Java 21 — what really changed? Java 17 gave us a solid and stable LTS foundation, with features like records, sealed classes, and improved pattern matching. It became the go-to choice for production systems. Java 21 takes things further with a strong focus on scalability and modern development. The highlight? Virtual Threads, enabling massive concurrency with simpler code. We also get improvements in pattern matching, new APIs (like Sequenced Collections), and better performance with enhancements in the JVM and garbage collectors. In short: Java 17 is stability. Java 21 is evolution. If you're building modern, high-scale systems, Java 21 is a big step forward
Java 17 vs Java 21 Key Changes
More Relevant Posts
-
Virtual Threads are probably the most significant change in JVM since the traditional concurrency model. In I/O-bound scenarios, they allow you to scale while maintaining simple and predictable code, something that historically required reactive or lots of engineering around pools. Still, the actual impact depends on how "thread-friendly" the remaining stack is.
Software Engineer | Java Software Engineer | Spring Boot | Microservices | Kafka | Cloud (GCP/AWS) | Banking Systems | AI Integration
Java 17 vs Java 21 — what really changed? Java 17 gave us a solid and stable LTS foundation, with features like records, sealed classes, and improved pattern matching. It became the go-to choice for production systems. Java 21 takes things further with a strong focus on scalability and modern development. The highlight? Virtual Threads, enabling massive concurrency with simpler code. We also get improvements in pattern matching, new APIs (like Sequenced Collections), and better performance with enhancements in the JVM and garbage collectors. In short: Java 17 is stability. Java 21 is evolution. If you're building modern, high-scale systems, Java 21 is a big step forward
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
One thing I like about Java is that the biggest progress is often not dramatic enough for social media. There is no single “magic” feature between Java 21 and 25 that changes everything overnight. What you get instead is something more valuable: a better platform. Between Java 21 and 25, Java added: ✅ Scoped Values, ✅ Structured Concurrency, ✅ Foreign Function & Memory API, ✅ Stream Gatherers, ✅ Class-File API, ✅ Compact Object Headers, ✅ Generational Shenandoah, ✅ more startup and profiling work, ✅ better JFR, ✅ and... cleaner syntax with unnamed variables and patterns, module import declarations, and more flexible constructor bodies. That is why I liked Frank Delporte’s video on the move from Java 21 to 25. It looks at Java the way real teams should look at it: not as isolated release notes, but as accumulated engineering progress between LTS versions. Too many people ignore the non-LTS releases and then act surprised when the next LTS contains a lot of change. Worth watching if you want a practical summary without drowning in JEP numbers. ➡️ https://lnkd.in/dnqmDUnj Are you on Java 25 yet?
From Java 21 to 25: The Features That Changed Everything (#90)
https://www.youtube.com/
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Thanks, Daniel Witkowski, for sharing this episode of the Friends of OpenJDK (Foojay.io) podcast about the changes between Java 21 and 25. And to Jakob Jenkov, Jonathan Vila López, Ryan Svihla, Mary Grygleski, 👓 Anton Arhipov, Ronald Dehuysser, and Jonathan Ellis, who took the time to share their point of view!
One thing I like about Java is that the biggest progress is often not dramatic enough for social media. There is no single “magic” feature between Java 21 and 25 that changes everything overnight. What you get instead is something more valuable: a better platform. Between Java 21 and 25, Java added: ✅ Scoped Values, ✅ Structured Concurrency, ✅ Foreign Function & Memory API, ✅ Stream Gatherers, ✅ Class-File API, ✅ Compact Object Headers, ✅ Generational Shenandoah, ✅ more startup and profiling work, ✅ better JFR, ✅ and... cleaner syntax with unnamed variables and patterns, module import declarations, and more flexible constructor bodies. That is why I liked Frank Delporte’s video on the move from Java 21 to 25. It looks at Java the way real teams should look at it: not as isolated release notes, but as accumulated engineering progress between LTS versions. Too many people ignore the non-LTS releases and then act surprised when the next LTS contains a lot of change. Worth watching if you want a practical summary without drowning in JEP numbers. ➡️ https://lnkd.in/dnqmDUnj Are you on Java 25 yet?
From Java 21 to 25: The Features That Changed Everything (#90)
https://www.youtube.com/
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Still on Java 8? You're missing out. Java has evolved significantly. It's time to unlock its modern power. The rapid six-month release cadence means Java is innovating faster than ever. Modern versions aren't just about significant performance gains; they introduce powerful language features that streamline development, improve code readability, and address common boilerplate. Adopting these new features future-proofs your applications and significantly enhances developer experience. Here's why you should upgrade: - Records simplify data transfer objects, reducing boilerplate significantly. - Pattern Matching for instanceof and switch statements makes code cleaner. - Text Blocks dramatically improve readability for multi-line strings like SQL or JSON. - Virtual Threads
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Stop ignoring Java updates. Modern Java is a game-changer for performance and productivity. Staying current isn't just about security; it's about competitive advantage. Many teams remain on older Java versions, missing out on significant language improvements, JVM optimizations, and new APIs. Modern releases like Java 17+ offer substantial performance gains and developer quality-of-life features that directly impact productivity. It's time to re-evaluate your upgrade strategy beyond just security patches. The incremental releases since Java 8 have brought an incredible suite of features that streamline development and boost runtime efficiency: - Record classes drastically simplify immutable data carriers and reduce boilerplate code. - Pattern Matching for instanceof enhances code readability and reduces casting verbosity. - Text Blocks provide a cleaner syntax for multi-line strings, improving code clarity. - Virtual Threads
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Java 21 virtual threads = 100x better memory efficiency. 10,000 concurrent users: - Java 17: 2GB memory - Java 21: 200MB memory Should you upgrade? Depends. https://lnkd.in/eNti373x
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
☕ Java 27 — JEP 527: Post-quantum TLS 1.3 hybrid key exchange SSLSocket socket = ( SSLSocket ) SSLContext.getDefault() .getSocketFactory() .createSocket(); SSLParameters params = socket.getSSLParameters(); params.setNamedGroups( new String[]{ "SecP256r1MLKEM768", "X25519MLKEM768", "secp256r1", "x25519" } ); socket.setSSLParameters( params ); • Java 27 adds hybrid post-quantum key exchange options to TLS 1.3. • The important message for developers is that javax.net.ssl users benefit by default, even without code changes. • This is the “quantum” feature worth talking about because it changes how teams think about long-term confidentiality. #java #java27 #jdk27 #tls13 #quantum #postquantum Go further with Java certification: Java👇 https://bit.ly/javaOCP Spring👇 https://bit.ly/2v7222 SpringBook👇 https://bit.ly/springtify JavaBook👇 https://bit.ly/jroadmap
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Java 8 changed Interfaces forever. Before Java 8, an interface was simple: 👉 Only abstract methods 👉 Only rules, no implementation But Java 8 said… “Let’s upgrade this.” ⚡ What changed in Java 8? Interfaces started doing more than just defining rules. They can now include: ✔ Default Methods → provide implementation inside interface ✔ Static Methods → utility methods within interface ✔ Functional Interfaces → foundation for lambda expressions Why this matters? Earlier problem: 👉 If you add a new method to an interface → All implementing classes break Now with default methods: 👉 You can extend interfaces → Without breaking existing code Real Impact: Cleaner code with lambda expressions Better backward compatibility More flexible and scalable design Interfaces are no longer passive… 👉 They are active design components 📂 Want to see code? Check out my implementation 👇 🔗 https://lnkd.in/gMbX3etx Java 8 vs Java 1.8 👉 Both refer to the same version 👉 “1.8” is internal version naming 👉 “Java 8” is official & widely used #Java #Java8 #Interface #FunctionalInterface #Lambda #Programming #OOP #DeveloperLife #CodingJourney #LearnJava
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Virtual Threads vs Traditional Threads in Java 24 Java is evolving — and concurrency just got a major upgrade. With Virtual Threads (Project Loom), Java applications can now handle massive concurrency with far less complexity and resource usage compared to traditional threads. * Traditional Threads (Platform Threads) Managed by the OS (1:1 mapping) High memory footprint (MBs per thread) Expensive to create and manage Limited scalability (thousands of threads) * Virtual Threads (Java 24) Managed by the JVM (many-to-few mapping) Lightweight (KBs per thread) Fast creation & minimal overhead Scales to millions of threads Ideal for I/O-bound and high-concurrency systems - Why it matters You can now write simple, synchronous-style code and still achieve asynchronous-level scalability — without complex reactive frameworks. - Same code style. - Better performance. - Massive scalability. Bottom line: Virtual Threads are a game-changer for building modern, scalable backend systems. #Java #VirtualThreads #ProjectLoom #Microservices #Backend #Scalability #Performance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Virtual Threads vs Traditional Threads in Java 24 Java is evolving — and concurrency just got a major upgrade. With Virtual Threads (Project Loom), Java applications can now handle massive concurrency with far less complexity and resource usage compared to traditional threads. * Traditional Threads (Platform Threads) Managed by the OS (1:1 mapping) High memory footprint (MBs per thread) Expensive to create and manage Limited scalability (thousands of threads) * Virtual Threads (Java 24) Managed by the JVM (many-to-few mapping) Lightweight (KBs per thread) Fast creation & minimal overhead Scales to millions of threads Ideal for I/O-bound and high-concurrency systems - Why it matters You can now write simple, synchronous-style code and still achieve asynchronous-level scalability — without complex reactive frameworks. - Same code style. - Better performance. - Massive scalability. Bottom line: Virtual Threads are a game-changer for building modern, scalable backend systems. #Java #VirtualThreads #ProjectLoom #Microservices #Backend #Scalability #Performance
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development