Imagine this scenario: You’re tracking a bug that’s causing the system to crash every time a user uploads a specific file type. The quick fix? Add a validation check to block that file type. Problem solved, right? But If you stop there, you’ve only treated the symptom. You haven’t asked why the system couldn't handle the file in the first place. Was it a memory leak in the parser? A race condition in the worker thread? A failure in a third-party library you assumed was "broken"? In software, we often mistake the "appearance" of a bug for its cause. Find the Root Cause, Not the Blame It is more likely that the actual fault is several steps removed from what you are observing. It might involve a tangled web of related things you haven't even looked at yet. When you find a bug especially one someone else wrote the natural instinct is to point fingers. But we focus on fixing the problem, not the blame. A bug is not "somebody's fault." It is "all of us" problem. 🤝 Don’t Panic: When you see a bug that "can't happen," remember: it clearly did happen. Don’t Assume It! Prove It: Turn off your ego. Don't gloss over code because you "know" it works. Prove it in the current context with real data. "Selected tool" Isn't Broken: It’s almost never the OS or the compiler. It’s almost always the application code. Once a bug is found, it should be the last time a human has to find it. The moment you discover the root cause, trap it with an automated test so it can never sneak back in. #SoftwareEngineering #PragmaticProgrammer #Debugging #RootCauseAnalysis #CleanCode #DevOps #GrowthMindset
Tabassom Entezami’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
📍 A very common developer problem (that no one talks about enough): “Everything works fine locally… but breaks in production.” Every developer has faced this. And it’s frustrating. You debug for hours, recheck logic, blame the code… But the issue is usually something else 👇 Lets understand what actually goes wrong? 1. Different environment configs (dev vs prod) 2. Missing or incorrect environment variables 3. Data differences (empty vs real-world scale) 4. Concurrency issues that only appear under load External dependencies behaving differently 👉 In short: Your code is not running in the same world anymore. ⚙️ What actually helps: ✔️ Maintain environment parity (same configs as prod) ✔️ Use realistic test data, not dummy values ✔️ Add proper logging & observability ✔️ Test under load, not just functionality ✔️ Never assume—verify in production-like conditions 💡 Reality check: Most bugs are not coding issues. They’re system understanding issues. If you’ve ever said “but it was working on my machine…” You’re not alone 😄, we are on the same boat. #Developers #SoftwareEngineering #Debugging #Backend #SystemDesign #CodingLife #TechCareers #Programming #DevProblems
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Software used to be reliable. Now downtime is a feature . LLMs are generating insecure code, and developers are shipping it to production without a second look. That's just a liability at this point. The recent Claude Code source leak is a good reminder: more lines of code ≠ better software. Shipping well-tested, reliable software is the job. Anything else is noise. Remember when you'd add a new package and head to Stack Overflow? Experienced engineers would break down the tradeoffs pros, cons, alternatives. You'd actually think before committing. Now? You ask an LLM, get an answer, and push. No context. No second opinion. No ownership. Don't stop practicing the craft. Ship slower. Review harder. Own the code you deploy. and btw look at github #softwareengineering #ai #webdev #security #buildinpublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
I wrote 500+ lines of code for one feature. It worked. That was the problem. While working on a backend system, I noticed something: Big methods don’t fail immediately. They fail when you try to scale, debug, or extend them. That’s when I started using the Pipeline Pattern. Instead of one large function, I broke the flow into steps: Input → Validate → Process → Save → Notify → Output Each step does one job only. -------------------------------------- What changed? - Code became easier to read - Debugging became step-by-step - Logic became reusable - System became scalable -------------------------------------- What about performance? The pipeline pattern adds a minor execution overhead due to multiple processing steps. However, most application latency comes from: - Database interactions - External API/network calls Since these dominate overall response time, the additional overhead is insignificant. In return, you gain better structure, testability, and scalability. -------------------------------------- Key takeaway: Good code runs. Great code scales. -------------------------------------- If you are building APIs or backend systems, this pattern is worth trying. -------------------------------------- #dotnet #csharp #cleanarchitecture #pipelinepattern #softwareengineering #backenddevelopment #coding #developers
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The Developer Agent Doesn’t Just Write Code Most people think a dev agent is there to generate code. That’s not how I’m using it. I call mine Archon. Right now, Archon operates in isolation. A cloned GitHub environment. Separate from production. Every change gets reviewed before it touches anything real. Archon doesn’t just build. It reviews: Code efficiency Logical flaws Hidden bugs Unintended consequences Then it improves what already exists. The shift: I’m not asking for code. I’m asking for better code. Most people use AI to accelerate development. I’m using it to raise the quality of what gets shipped. Nothing goes straight to production. Everything passes through scrutiny first. That’s where most systems break. Not in creation. In what gets allowed to continue. Archon reduces that risk. I still decide what merges, but I’m not reviewing everything alone anymore. Without this layer, speed becomes liability. Tomorrow I’ll break down the security agent and how I make sure nothing unsafe ever gets deployed.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Handling edge cases is not optional. It’s what separates working code from reliable systems. Most of the time, your code works because you’re testing the happy path: valid input, expected flow, and no surprises. But real users don’t behave like that. They: - Leave fields empty - Send unexpected data - Click things multiple times - Break assumptions And that’s where systems fail. Why edge cases matter: bugs don’t come from normal cases. They come from what you didn’t consider. One missed edge case can lead to: - Crashes - Wrong data - Security issues - Bad user experience The real shift is from asking, “Does this work?” to “What can break this?” That question alone makes your code stronger. If your code only works in perfect conditions, it’s not ready for real users. What’s one edge case that surprised you the most? #SoftwareEngineering #BackendDevelopment #Debugging #Developers #Coding #SystemDesign
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 Unlock High-Performance Backend Systems Your backend isn’t just code — it’s the engine that powers speed, scalability, and security. Want to build systems that actually perform under pressure? Focus on these 3 core principles 👇 ⚡ 1. Asynchronous Programming Stop blocking your system with slow operations. Use async workflows to handle multiple tasks efficiently. 📊 2. Smart Data Optimization Fast systems aren’t about more data — they’re about better queries. Use indexing and analyze query performance. 🔒 3. Security-First Approach Security is not optional. Implement authentication, validate inputs, and always use secure protocols. 💡 Build systems that are: ✔ FAST ✔ SCALABLE ✔ SECURE 👇 What’s your go-to backend optimization tip? #BackendDevelopment #mr_vepari #SoftwareEngineering #WebDevelopment #TechTips #Programming #Coding #SystemDesign
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
How to Build a Secure Local-First Agent Runtime with OpenClaw Gateway, Skills, and Controlled Tool Execution #WORLDNEWS #How #Build #Secure 🗞️🤓👇 https://lnkd.in/ed4n39TM
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most bugs I fixed… weren’t actually bugs. I used to spend hours debugging issues that looked like logic errors. Something breaks. The output is wrong. Users complain. It feels like a bug. But after digging deeper, the real problem was almost always somewhere else. 1. State updates happening in multiple places 2. API responses not normalized properly 3. Components reacting to stale or duplicated data 4. No clear ownership of where data should live The code wasn’t "wrong." The system was. In one case, fixing a "bug" didn’t require changing business logic at all. I just simplified the data flow and moved state closer to where it was used. The issue disappeared. That changed how I approach debugging. I stopped asking: "Where is the bug?" And started asking: "Why does this system allow this to happen?" The lesson? If your architecture is unclear, bugs will keep reappearing in different forms. Fixing them individually won’t scale. Good engineers fix bugs. Great engineers fix the conditions that create them. #softwareengineering #frontend #react
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
“I don’t always test my code… but when I do, it’s in production.” → Funny how this still hits. Everything looks solid on localhost. Clean data. Smooth flow. No surprises. Confidence is high. Then you deploy… …and something breaks in a way you didn’t expect. Not because the code is completely wrong, but because production is just a different world. People don’t use your product the way you imagined. They click fast, skip steps, refresh at the worst time, or enter things you never planned for. The data isn’t neat either. There are missing values, duplicates, strange formats, and old records that behave differently from your test data. And your app isn’t working alone anymore. It depends on real APIs, real servers, real networks. Sometimes they’re slow. Sometimes they fail. Sometimes they respond slightly differently and that’s enough to break things. Even the environment plays its part. Different configurations, different limits, small differences that seem harmless until they aren’t. Most of the time, it’s not one big mistake. It’s a collection of small assumptions that worked locally but don’t hold up in the real world. That’s what production really does. It exposes the gap between how we think things will work and how they actually behave. Because production will always find what you missed. And once you’ve experienced that a few times, you stop testing just to confirm things work and start testing to understand how they fail. That shift changes everything. #SoftwareDevelopment #CodingLife #Developers #Programming #Tech
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development