Are you measuring GitHub Copilot usage… or real impact? 🤔💡 Many teams proudly track seats, active users, and suggestion acceptance in GitHub Copilot. That’s adoption. But leadership conversations are shifting toward something else: 👉 Is AI actually improving engineering performance? This is where gh-devlake changes the game. Built as a GitHub CLI extension, gh-devlake connects Copilot usage data with real delivery metrics across your engineering systems. More details and how to start: https://msft.it/6046QcI8j Instead of looking at AI stats in isolation, you can correlate: 📊 Copilot usage ⏱️ PR cycle time 🚀 Deployment frequency 🛠️ Change failure rate 🔁 Mean time to recovery Now we’re talking about impact. What I like about this approach is that it moves the conversation from opinion to evidence. You’re no longer asking whether AI “feels” productive. You’re analyzing how AI adoption aligns with actual delivery outcomes in your organization. For engineering leaders, this is critical. AI investments need defensible ROI narratives. DevLake Copilot gives you the foundation to build them using your own DevOps data. We are entering the phase where AI in engineering is not about experimentation anymore. It is about measurable value. Are you already correlating Copilot adoption with delivery metrics? Or still tracking usage alone? #GitHubCopilot #EngineeringLeadership #DeveloperProductivity #SoftwareEngineering #msftadvocate
Measuring GitHub Copilot's Real Impact on Engineering Performance
More Relevant Posts
-
Are you measuring GitHub Copilot usage… or real impact? 🤔💡 Many teams proudly track seats, active users, and suggestion acceptance in GitHub Copilot. That’s adoption. But leadership conversations are shifting toward something else: 👉 Is AI actually improving engineering performance? This is where gh-devlake changes the game. Built as a GitHub CLI extension, gh-devlake connects Copilot usage data with real delivery metrics across your engineering systems. More details and how to start: https://msft.it/6040QYH3E Instead of looking at AI stats in isolation, you can correlate: 📊 Copilot usage ⏱️ PR cycle time 🚀 Deployment frequency 🛠️ Change failure rate 🔁 Mean time to recovery Now we’re talking about impact. What I like about this approach is that it moves the conversation from opinion to evidence. You’re no longer asking whether AI “feels” productive. You’re analyzing how AI adoption aligns with actual delivery outcomes in your organization. For engineering leaders, this is critical. AI investments need defensible ROI narratives. DevLake Copilot gives you the foundation to build them using your own DevOps data. We are entering the phase where AI in engineering is not about experimentation anymore. It is about measurable value. Are you already correlating Copilot adoption with delivery metrics? Or still tracking usage alone? #GitHubCopilot #EngineeringLeadership #DeveloperProductivity #SoftwareEngineering #msftadvocate
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Are you measuring GitHub Copilot usage… or real impact? 🤔💡 Many teams proudly track seats, active users, and suggestion acceptance in GitHub Copilot. That’s adoption. But leadership conversations are shifting toward something else: 👉 Is AI actually improving engineering performance? This is where gh-devlake changes the game. Built as a GitHub CLI extension, gh-devlake connects Copilot usage data with real delivery metrics across your engineering systems. More details and how to start: https://msft.it/6046Qcnlp Instead of looking at AI stats in isolation, you can correlate: 📊 Copilot usage ⏱️ PR cycle time 🚀 Deployment frequency 🛠️ Change failure rate 🔁 Mean time to recovery Now we’re talking about impact. What I like about this approach is that it moves the conversation from opinion to evidence. You’re no longer asking whether AI “feels” productive. You’re analyzing how AI adoption aligns with actual delivery outcomes in your organization. For engineering leaders, this is critical. AI investments need defensible ROI narratives. DevLake Copilot gives you the foundation to build them using your own DevOps data. We are entering the phase where AI in engineering is not about experimentation anymore. It is about measurable value. Are you already correlating Copilot adoption with delivery metrics? Or still tracking usage alone? #GitHubCopilot #EngineeringLeadership #DeveloperProductivity #SoftwareEngineering #msftadvocate
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Stop Wasting Tokens: The 2026 GitHub Copilot Power Guide 🚀🛠️ Over the past few years, GitHub Copilot has evolved far beyond autocomplete. What used to be helpful suggestions is now closer to a system of specialized AI agents that can assist across your entire workflow. And with that shift, how we use it as developers is changing too. 🛠️ From prompting → to delegation Instead of relying on a single “do everything” approach, Copilot works best when you guide it clearly: • @terminal → for CLI, scripts, debugging • @docs → for accurate framework references • @test → for generating unit tests quickly 👉 Small shift, big impact on productivity ⚡ Thinking in systems, not steps One of the biggest unlocks is using tools like Composer for multi-file workflows. Instead of breaking tasks into many prompts, you can describe the outcome: “Add a Stripe webhook with a success email flow” …and let Copilot handle structure across files. 👉 Less back-and-forth, more momentum 🧠 Context matters more than ever Copilot performs best when the context is clear and focused. A few habits that help: • Keep only relevant files open • Use explicit references like #file:UserController.ts • Avoid vague descriptions when you can be precise 👉 Better context → better results 🧬 Let your types do the talking Providing structure (TypeScript interfaces, schemas) often works better than long explanations. It helps Copilot align with your system faster and more accurately. 🔁 Consistency improves results Using a simple structure for prompts: [Task] [Context] [Constraints] [Output Format] …can noticeably improve both output quality and efficiency over time. 🚀 The bigger shift As developers, the value is gradually moving from: Writing every line of code → Designing how systems get built Copilot is no longer just a tool you use. It’s something you collaborate with and guide. Curious how others are adapting their workflows—what’s been your biggest unlock so far? #GitHubCopilot #AIEngineering #SoftwareDevelopment #DeveloperProductivity #DevTools #GenerativeAI #TechLeadership #SeniorDevelopers #AIWorkflow
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 Your Next Project Could Be 3x Faster With This New AI Tool GitHub Copilot 3.0: The AI Pair Programmer That Just Got a Massive Upgrade GitHub has just released Copilot 3.0, adding real‑time multi‑language support, Docker‑Compose integration, and a new context‑aware suggestion engine that learns from your entire repository. The update also brings a 70 % faster code generation speed and a 30 % boost in pull request approvals, according to GitHub’s own metrics. Why it matters: If you’re a developer, agency, or business owner, this means you can prototype features, fix bugs, and ship releases faster while keeping code quality high. Teams that adopt Copilot 3.0 report lower turnaround times on sprint cycles and a noticeable drop in post‑deployment issues. Your take as a 9‑year veteran: I’m excited to see how Copilot can cut down boilerplate work, but I still keep a human eye on the logic. Relying solely on AI can hide subtle bugs, and the learning curve for the new Docker integration is steep for teams that haven’t used containerization before. What do you think? Overhyped or a real productivity boost? Check if your team can integrate Copilot 3.0 today and see if the speed gains match your project goals. #TechNews #WebDevelopment #AI #GitHub #Copilot3 #DeveloperTools #CodingEfficiency #SoftwareEngineering #Productivity #Innovation #DigitalTransformation #TechTrends #BusinessGrowth #RemoteWork #FutureOfWork
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
GitHub has enhanced Copilot’s usage metrics API with pull request throughput and time-to-merge data. This enables organizations to quantitatively assess how AI-powered code suggestions influence key development workflows—from review activity to merge speed. A valuable step toward data-driven software delivery optimization. #GitHub #Copilot #SoftwareDevelopment #DevOps #AI ⬇️ https://lnkd.in/dDSNtevJ
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
STOP saying your team knows GitHub. Let’s be honest. If your team is only: → Pushing code → Creating pull requests → Merging branches That’s NOT “knowing GitHub.” That’s just… basic usage. Here’s what most teams are missing: ❌ No automation (everything manual) ❌ No AI usage (slow development) ❌ No security checks (risky deployments) ❌ No structured workflows (messy collaboration) 💡 Meanwhile, high-performing teams are: ✔ Automating everything with GitHub Actions ✔ Writing code faster using Copilot ✔ Catching vulnerabilities early ✔ Shipping faster with fewer errors 👉 Same tool. 👉 Completely different outcomes. At Evolvv, we help teams move from: “Just using GitHub” → to → “building high-performance engineering workflows.” 🔥 If your team is still at the basic level, you’re already behind. #Evolvv #GitHub #DevOps #AI #GitHubCopilot #Automation #SoftwareDevelopment #TechTeams #Upskilling #EngineeringLeadership
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🌅 Github sunsets its legacy Metrics API on April 2, 2026. Here is the replacement: https://lnkd.in/ena2rGuB (open-sourced under MIT license). If you are currently using any external dashboard to track Github Copilot adoption in your team, it will likely break in 2 weeks, and a brand new built-in native dashboard announced recently is yet rudimentary. Hence, I spent some time vibe-coding alternative so you don’t have to waste tokens building your own. ⛲ Key Features: 1️⃣ Tracks activity of team members — number of interactions and output produced daily, segregating between writing code, documentation and configuration for applications under development. 2️⃣ Provides Month-over-Month comparisons and performance trends for teams and individuals, giving you insights into growing maturity of AI adoption among your peers and subordinates. 3️⃣ Updates you about most frequently used models, languages and IDEs, turning an hour-long audit into a one-minute task. 🤼 Target Audience & Use Cases: – CTOs/VPs Engineering: Justify ROI to the board. – Engineering Managers: Identify adoption gaps, track team health, spot activity spikes. – AI/Agile Coaches: find power-users to promote as mentors, see which models are trending across teams. Tech Stack: Node.js on BE, vanilla HTML/JS of FE, local JSON storage. Requires Github PAT with access rights to API and org:read scope to get your data. ☢️ Disclaimer: fully vibe-coded, not heavily tested yet. Contributors welcomed. #github #ghcp #copilot #metrics #api #dashboard #oss #llm #genai #sdlc #engineering #opensource #productivity
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
AI as a Tool for Better Craftsmanship, Not Just Speed. I recently earned the Microsoft Applied Skills: Accelerate AI-assisted development by using GitHub Copilot credential. While the "acceleration" part is great, my focus is on how this elevates the quality of my output as a developer. For me, using GitHub Copilot isn’t about writing more code—it’s about writing better code. Here is how I’m applying these skills to my daily workflow: - Enforcing Clean Code: Using Copilot to suggest refactoring patterns that align with SOLID principles and keep my methods lean and readable. - Elevating the Definition of Done: Leveraging AI to identify edge cases early, ensuring that the logic I deliver is robust before it even hits the Peer Review stage. - Deep Logic & Less Noise: By letting the tool handle the repetitive boilerplate, I can dedicate more mental energy to system architecture and solving complex business logic. The goal is simple: deliver cleaner, more maintainable code that adds long-term value to the project. This credential was a great way to refine the techniques that help me get there. #DotNet #GitHubCopilot #CleanCode #SoftwareEngineering #ContinuousImprovement
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Most organisations are letting GitHub Copilot agents loose with prompts and hoping for the best. That’s not an operating model. That’s a risk! To go deeper on the last post, I shared a repo — a practical way to train, govern, and standardise how GitHub Copilot agents behave inside your codebases. 👉 https://lnkd.in/eRQh8ms5 The premise is simple: Instead of prompting harder, codify engineering discipline so agents execute with — consistently and at scale. 🧠 What the Dojo enforces (the “Six Disciplines”): 🥋 Plan before striking → Agents must plan the work before touching code 🧩 Delegate with sub‑agents → Research & parallel analysis without flooding context 🔁 Learn from every fall → Lessons captured after corrections so mistakes don’t repeat ✅ Prove the technique → Tests, logs, diffs required before anything is “done” 🎯 Pursue elegant form → Agents challenge hacks and shortcut fixes 🐞 Fix what’s broken, solo → Reproduce → diagnose → fix → verify, no hand‑holding 📜 What’s actually in the repo: • skills.md → the core behavioral “kata” agents auto‑discover • .github/copilot-instructions.md → the house rules and workflow and lessons.md → self-improvement This is the same shift we made years ago with: • CI/CD pipelines • Cloud landing zones AI agents are next. 👀 Question for tech leaders: Are you treating AI agents as first‑class team members with standards and training? Or are they still freelancing in your organization’s repos? Because unmanaged agents don’t just move fast — they move fast in the wrong direction. #AgenticAI #GitHubCopilot #microsoft #EngineeringLeadership #AIArchitect #DevEx
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore related topics
- Impact of Github Copilot on Project Delivery
- How to Implement Copilot in Your Organization
- How Copilot can Boost Your Productivity
- Leadership Prompts for Copilot Users
- Assessing Copilot Adoption in Law Firms
- Best Practices For Implementing AI In Engineering
- Improving ERP Performance with Co-Pilot Tools
- Engineering Software Usage Metrics
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
How do I tell which code in my repo is GenAI-written?