⚠️ The future of encryption may be closer than we think. Recent discussions around quantum computing suggest that current encryption standards protecting the internet today could become vulnerable in the coming years. Technologies securing critical systems such as: • Emails • Banking systems • HTTPS communication • VPN networks • Cryptocurrencies all rely heavily on cryptographic algorithms like RSA and ECC. With advancements in quantum computing, these traditional encryption methods could potentially be broken much faster than classical computers allow today. This is why researchers and organizations are already working on Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) to develop encryption systems that remain secure even in a quantum era. For cybersecurity professionals, this raises important questions: 🔹 How soon could quantum computing impact current security systems? 🔹 Are organizations preparing for quantum-resistant encryption? 🔹 What role will cybersecurity analysts play in this transition? One thing is certain the future of cybersecurity will evolve alongside quantum computing. 💬 Curious to hear your thoughts: Do you think quantum computing will significantly reshape cybersecurity in the next decade? #CyberSecurity #QuantumComputing #InformationSecurity #Encryption #PostQuantumCryptography #CyberThreats #TechnologyTrends #CyberSecurityAwareness
Let’s Set the Record Straight on Quantum I think the conversation around quantum is starting to drift into unnecessary panic. Yes, the risk is real. But this is not an overnight collapse. It is a transition. From where I sit, the real issue is not quantum. It is that most organizations do not know where their cryptography lives, do not understand dependencies, and do not have execution-level governance in place. That is the gap. At GCTI, we are not waiting on timelines. We are already deploying post-quantum encryption in controlled environments and enforcing it through our AEGIS control plane. This is manageable when approached correctly. If you are unsure what to do next, do not follow the noise. Learn how to course correct before it becomes a problem.
This is a terrible, click baity over exaggeration. That is infact not what Google said. The primary targets for quantum computers using Shor’s Algorithm are asymmetric (public-key) systems: RSA / ECC HTTPS, Email, Crypto Wallets High (Vulnerable to Shor's) AES-256 File/Disk Encryption Low (Needs larger keys, but relatively resistant) PQC New "Quantum-Safe" Standards None (Designed to be resistant) That's hardly all internet encryption and yes, while this is a significant development and worthy of attention. The fear mongering for engagement isn't helpful.
Sensationalised headline - this is just the earliest "Q-day" prediction to justify Google accelerating their move to post-quantum cryptography...
Insightful breakdown. The reality is that the private sector rarely jumps out of the water until it is already boiling. We have reached that point with quantum computing. The shift we are seeing toward mandatory PQC in current legislation, complete with significant fines, is the only way to ensure the frog survives. It forces CNI partners to stop seeing cybersecurity as a deferred expense and start treating it as the national security priority it actually is. The age of voluntary roadmaps, in the UK at least, is officially over with the advent of the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill.
Well, the bigger issue isn’t immediate breakage, but long term exposure via ‘harvest now, decrypt later.’ Transitioning to Post Quantum Cryptography (PQC) should be the real focus moving forward!
I believe quantum computing will significantly reshape cybersecurity but the bigger challenge is organizational readiness, not just technology. Many systems, especially in critical infrastructure, have long lifecycles and cannot be easily upgraded. That’s where early planning and phased PQC adoption become crucial. Curious to see how different sectors are approaching this.
and power grids!
You don't need a big crap of pipes to crack something a government agency can provide anyway! But the real question is what QC has solved until now ? Exactly ? Timeline : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_quantum_computing_and_communication Google : "what quantum computing have already solved ?" Answer "Quantum computers are not yet practical for real-world applications"
Let's be direct: quantum computing is not the threat to cryptocurrency that the current narrative claims. Classical number-theoretic attacks on the underlying prime architecture are a known, documented vulnerability — and the research establishing this has faced unusual resistance for decades. Congressionally mandated hardware backdoors cannot be selectively secured. Our adversaries understand this. What's being protected isn't national security — it's the coherence of a flawed policy position. Open cryptanalytic research is a defensive asset. Treating it as a liability has left us exposed in ways that classification cannot fix.