I once broke a feature by optimizing async calls. Everything worked fine until one API failed. The whole flow crashed. That’s when I realized not all Promise helpers behave the same. At first, they look similar. But their behavior under failure is very different. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲.𝗮𝗹𝗹() felt perfect until one request failed. Then everything failed. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲.𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲() was even trickier. It returned the first result success or failure and ignored the rest. And then I discovered 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲.𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗦𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗱() It didn’t fail fast. It waited. Returned everything success and failure. That’s when it clicked: `Promise.all()` → all must succeed `Promise.race()` → first one wins `Promise.allSettled()` → nothing is ignored Same problem space. Completely different intent. Sometimes bugs aren’t about async code. They’re about choosing the wrong abstraction. #JavaScript #AsyncProgramming #SoftwareEngineering
Choosing the right Promise abstraction in JavaScript
More Relevant Posts
-
𝗜 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝟯 𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝗯𝘂𝗴𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗔𝗻𝗴𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗺 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗮 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱: 𝗮𝗻𝘆. 🤦♂️ TypeScript evangelist on my team. Told juniors to "always type everything." Then I did this: // ❌ "Just for now" — famous last words getUserData(): any { return this.http.get('/api/user'); } - "Just for now" became 4 months of 𝗮𝗻𝘆 quietly spreading through the codebase like a virus. - No errors. No warnings. Just TypeScript politely stepping aside while I shot myself in the foot. - The bug? A backend team renamed 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗿.𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹𝗡𝗮𝗺𝗲 to 𝘂𝘀𝗲𝗿.𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹_𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲. TypeScript should've screamed. Instead, it shrugged — because any told it to stay out. - We found it in production. Via a client email. // ✅ What "just for now" should actually look like interface User { id: number; full_name: string; email: string; } getUser(): Observable<User> { return this.http.get<User>('/api/user'); } -Now if the backend changes that field — TypeScript breaks the build before it breaks the client. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗼𝗻: 𝗮𝗻𝘆 isn't a type. It's a debt you take on with zero interest rate — until suddenly it compounds all at once. The worst bugs aren't the ones TypeScript catches. They're the ones you told TypeScript to ignore. 💬 𝗛𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝘁𝘆𝗽𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗻𝗼𝘄? 𝗕𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘁. 𝗡𝗼𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆'𝘀 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴. #TypeScript #Angular #Frontend #WebDevelopment #CleanCode #SoftwareEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝟲/𝟳 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗱 - 𝗜 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝘁 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 𝗜𝗥𝗖𝗧𝗖-𝘀𝘁𝘆𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗲𝘁 𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺, 𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲-𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘂𝗲 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 ...𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱 🚆 This wasn’t just about writing async/await code. It helped me understand how real systems behave: • Managing 𝘀𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 flows for multiple users • Using 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗹 execution to get fastest results • Handling errors properly with validations • Designing flows closer to real backend systems The biggest takeaway - Promises finally made sense in a real-world context. This felt like a shift from just coding → to thinking in systems. Big thanks to Hitesh Choudhary, Piyush Garg and Chai Aur Code team for the guidance. #javascript #nodejs #asyncawait #backenddevelopment #learninpublic #chaicode
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
TypeScript strict mode isn't about catching bugs. It's about making your team speak the same language. Without strict mode, TypeScript fills in the blanks for you. A variable without a type? It's "any" A function parameter without annotation? Also "any" The code compiles. Everything looks fine. Until someone else reads your code and has to guess what a function accepts, what it returns, and whether null is a valid input. Without strict, every developer writes their own dialect. The types technically exist but they don't communicate anything. With strict, the type system becomes a shared contract. If a function accepts a string, it accepts a string. Not string-or-null-or-undefined-or-whatever. I work on a fintech codebase with strict mode on. When I read a function signature, I know exactly what it expects. No guessing. No tracing through three files to confirm. The types do the communication that comments used to do. There's another angle now: 94% of LLM-generated compilation errors are type-check failures. Strict TypeScript isn't just team communication anymore. It's a verification layer for AI-generated code. The stricter your types, the more low-signal mistakes get rejected before review ever starts. #JavaScript #TypeScript #WebDevelopment #SoftwareArchitecture #Frontend
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Why TypeScript is non-negotiable for Scalable APIs. The "510" error is why I stopped writing pure JavaScript for production. We’ve all seen it. You expect a sum of 5 + 10 = 15, but instead, you get "510" because JavaScript decided to concatenate a string instead of adding numbers. In a small script, that’s a "funny" bug. In a mission-critical backend service, that’s a production incident. This is why TypeScript is not "nice to have" in the NestJS ecosystem but it’s an essential requirement. When you use TypeScript, you’re not just adding types; you’re building a contract for your data. Why it matters for your team: - Compile-time safety: Catch the "510" error at 2:00 PM on your machine, not at 2:00 AM in your logs. - Self-Documenting Code: When you hover over a function, you know exactly what it needs and what it returns. No more guessing what data contains. IDE Superpowers: IntelliSense, safe refactoring, and auto-completion make your team 2x faster. - TypeScript moves your debugging to the earliest possible stage. As a Senior Engineer, my job isn't to write code faster; it's to write code that stays broken for the least amount of time. Do you still feel the "pain" of debugging runtime type errors in your current stack? Let's talk about how to solve it. #TypeScript #JavaScript #NestJS #SoftwareEngineering #CodeQuality #DeveloperExperience
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Understanding Async/Await vs Promises — Writing Cleaner Asynchronous JavaScript ⚡ While working with APIs and backend services, handling asynchronous operations efficiently is critical. Recently, I revisited the differences between Promises and Async/Await to improve code readability and maintainability in real-world applications. Here’s a quick breakdown 👇 🔹 Promises (.then / .catch) • Uses chaining to handle asynchronous operations • Provides fine-grained control over execution flow • Useful for handling multiple async tasks • Can become complex with deep chaining (callback-like nesting) 🔹 Async / Await • Built on top of Promises • Makes asynchronous code look synchronous • Improves readability and debugging • Simplifies error handling using try...catch 💡 Key Learning: Async/Await doesn’t replace Promises — it simplifies how we write and manage asynchronous logic, making production code cleaner and easier to maintain. Currently exploring deeper into: ⚡ Promise.all() ⚡ Promise.race() ⚡ Error Handling Patterns ⚡ Async Performance Optimization Always learning. Always improving. 🚀 #JavaScript #AsyncAwait #Promises #WebDevelopment #FrontendDevelopment #FullStackDeveloper #MERNStack #SoftwareDeveloper #APIIntegration #NodeJS #DeveloperJourney #BuildInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🧠 Promises made async code better… But Async/Await made it feel like synchronous code. 🔹 What is Async/Await? - It’s a cleaner way to write Promises. - async → makes a function return a Promise - await → pauses execution until the Promise resolves 🔹 Example (Without Async/Await) fetch("api/data") .then((res) => res.json()) .then((data) => console.log(data)) .catch((err) => console.log(err)); 🔹 Same Example (With Async/Await) async function getData() { try { const res = await fetch("api/data"); const data = await res.json(); console.log(data); } catch (err) { console.log(err); } } 🔹 Why Async/Await? ✅ Cleaner & more readable ✅ Looks like normal (sync) code ✅ Easier error handling with try...catch 💡 Key Idea - Async/Await is just syntactic sugar over Promises. 🚀 Takeaway - async returns a Promise - await waits for it - Makes async code simple & readable Next post: Fetch API Explained Simply 🌐 #JavaScript #AsyncAwait #Promises #Frontend #WebDevelopment #LearnJS #Programming #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
⚠️ One bug took me hours to fix… but taught me this 👇 I was working on a real-time feature using WebRTC in React… Everything looked fine. But the video wasn’t showing for some users. 😶 After hours of debugging, I realized: 👉 It wasn’t a UI issue 👉 It wasn’t a state issue It was a network issue (ICE candidates & connection handling) That moment changed how I approach debugging. Here’s what I learned: 💡 Don’t assume the problem is where it “looks” 💡 Always check the full flow (frontend + backend + network) 💡 Logs are your best friend Since then, I’ve started: ✔️ Breaking problems into smaller parts ✔️ Debugging step-by-step instead of guessing ✔️ Understanding systems, not just code Debugging is frustrating… but honestly, it’s where real learning happens 🚀 Have you ever spent hours on a bug that turned out to be something unexpected? 😅 #ReactJS #WebRTC #FrontendDeveloper #Debugging #SoftwareEngineering #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🧠 Tired of messy async code like callbacks inside callbacks? That’s exactly why Promises exist. 🔹 What is a Promise? A Promise represents a value that will be available: - Now ❌ - In the future ✅ 🔹 Promise States A Promise has 3 states 👇 1️⃣ Pending → Initial state (still waiting) 2️⃣ Fulfilled → Task completed successfully 3️⃣ Rejected → Task failed 🔹 Example const promise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => { let success = true; if (success) { resolve("Task completed"); } else { reject("Task failed"); } }); promise .then((result) => console.log(result)) .catch((error) => console.log(error)); 🔹 Why Promises? Without Promises: ❌ Callback hell 😵💫 With Promises: ✅ Cleaner code ✅ Better error handling ✅ Easier async flow 💡 Key Idea - A Promise is a placeholder for a future result. 🚀 Takeaway - Promises handle async operations - They make code readable - They avoid nested callbacks Next post: Async/Await Explained Simply 🔥 #JavaScript #Promises #AsyncJS #Frontend #WebDevelopment #LearnJS #Programming #LearningInPublic
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🚀 Skill Boosters — Notes #6: Struggling to understand how Node.js handles multiple requests? Let’s simplify it 👇 Link: https://lnkd.in/ebN-Cdmy In Node.js, everything revolves around a few powerful concepts: 👉 Event Loop 👉 Single Thread 👉 Asynchronous Programming 👉 Event-Driven Architecture 💡 Here’s the magic: Node.js is single-threaded, yet it can handle thousands of users at the same time. How? Because it doesn’t wait. 🔄 Event Loop Think of it as a manager that keeps checking: “Is the main thread free?” “Yes? Let’s execute the next task.” ⚡ Async > Sync Instead of blocking: ✔ Sends heavy tasks (API, DB, file) to background ✔ Continues handling other requests ✔ Comes back when task is done 🧵 Single Thread ≠ Slow Node.js uses: 👉 Single thread for execution 👉 + Background threads (libuv) for heavy work 🎧 Event-Driven System Everything is based on events: Request comes → event triggered Task completes → callback executed 🔥 Real Power This combination makes Node.js: ✔ Fast ✔ Scalable ✔ Perfect for APIs & real-time apps 💭 One Line Takeaway: 👉 Node.js= Single Thread + Event Loop + Async = High Performance Backend If you're building backend systems, mastering this is a game changer. 💬 What confused you the most about Node.js earlier? Event loop or async? #NodeJS #BackendDevelopment #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #SystemDesign #Programming
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Why do we still talk about Callbacks, Promises, and Async/Await? 🧐 Because a blocked main thread doesn’t just slow things down — it breaks user experience. As developers, we constantly deal with API calls, file I/O, and data fetching. The real challenge isn’t what we do, but how we handle it without freezing our applications. Here’s a quick look at the evolution of asynchronous JavaScript: 🔹 Callbacks Simple and straightforward — until they scale. Nested callbacks quickly turn into “callback hell,” making debugging and maintenance painful. 🔹 Promises A significant improvement. With .then() and .catch(), we gained better control, cleaner chaining, and structured error handling. 🔹 Async/Await The modern standard. Cleaner, more readable, and closer to synchronous code — making try/catch error handling intuitive and reducing complexity. 💡 Why it matters Clean async code isn’t just a best practice — it’s essential. It reduces technical debt, improves readability, and makes collaboration across teams much smoother. Take a look at the infographic below for a clear side-by-side comparison 👇 #JavaScript #AsyncProgramming #WebDevelopment #CleanCode #SoftwareEngineering
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore content categories
- Career
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Engineering
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development
Love the breakdown here, man. Sheharyar K.