Switching from Redux to Zustand for Simplified State Management

I switched from Redux to Zustand and I'm not going back. For context ,I've been managing state with Redux for years. Actions, reducers, dispatchers, boilerplate everywhere. It works but it's a lot. Zustand is just... ```js const useStore = create((set) => ({  count: 0,  increment: () => set((s) => ({ count: s.count + 1 })) })) ``` That's it. No Provider wrapping. No action types. No separate reducer file. I dropped it into a React Native project last week. Setup took 5 minutes. The whole team understood it immediately without any explanation. Sometimes the best solution is just the simple one. If you're still writing Redux boilerplate for small-to-mid projects, give Zustand one try. You'll feel the difference immediately. #React #ReactNative #JavaScript #Zustand #Frontend #WebDevelopment

  • No alternative text description for this image

I’ve had a similar experience. Zustand is great when you want something lightweight and easy to reason about, especially for small to mid-sized apps. The minimal API and lack of boilerplate definitely make adoption much smoother for teams. Redux still has its place though — particularly in larger systems where strict structure, devtools, and predictable flows really help. In the end it often comes down to the complexity of the state model rather than the library itself.

Usually there is almost no global state when TanStack Query is used for api calls.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories