Controller vs RestController in Spring Boot

@Controller vs @RestController in Spring Boot — A Practical Perspective After working on multiple Spring Boot applications over the past few years, I’ve often seen confusion around when to use @Controller vs @RestController. Here’s how I understand and use them in real projects 👇 🔹 @Controller Primarily used for MVC-based applications Returns view names (HTML/JSP pages) Requires @ResponseBody if you want to return JSON 🔹 @RestController Combines @Controller + @ResponseBody Returns data directly (JSON/XML) Mainly used for REST APIs and microservices 🔹 Key Difference (From My Experience) @Controller → Best suited for web applications with UI (server-side rendering) @RestController → Ideal for backend services, REST APIs, and microservice architecture 🔹 What I Use in Real Projects In most of my work involving REST APIs and service-to-service communication, I prefer @RestController because it simplifies development and keeps the code clean. 👉 Key Takeaway: Understanding the difference helps in choosing the right approach based on application needs rather than using annotations blindly. In my experience, selecting the right abstraction early makes applications easier to scale and maintain. Which one do you prefer in your projects — @Controller or @RestController? Let’s discuss Follow Rahul Gupta for more content on Backend Development, Java, Microservices and System Design. #Java #SpringBoot #RESTAPI #BackendDevelopment #SoftwareEngineering #Microservices #Developers #JavaDeveloper #Coding #CareerGrowth #SystemDesign #TechCareers #Java8 #SoftwareDeveloper #SoftwareEngineer #IT #Fullstackdeveloper

  • graphical user interface, application

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories