Java null checks: style or best practice?

Java devs, quick question on null checks! 🚩 I often see two styles for null checking an object's method result: if (object.getValue() != null) if (null != object.getValue()) My team lead suggests that using null != object.getValue() helps avoid NullPointerExceptions if object is null, while object.getValue() != null won't. But from what I understand, both can throw a NullPointerException if the object itself is null because the method is called on a null reference. So, is this a matter of style only? Or is there some deeper reason or best practice behind preferring one over the other? How do you handle null checks? Would love to hear your views and experiences! #Java #NullCheck #CodingBestPractices #SoftwareEngineering #JavaTips

Yes, both will throw NPE. We need to first check the nullability of object itself to resolve NPE. Whatever close reason I got it is, maybe he is suggesting yoda style where we accidentally assign a variable to null or any value while comparing and accidentally using only single '=' operator, mostly in languages(c,js,..) that can expect truthy and falsy value in if block (unlike java which only expect predicate) can lead to buggy code. So if you use null or any constant in left side it will give compile time error. Which are better than run time errors.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories