Proper Data Splitting for Machine Learning Models

🔷A simple train test split is not always enough. I learned this the hard way when my model looked great on paper and struggled on real data. 📌Here is what nobody tells you about splitting data properly. The basic split gives you two sets. Training and testing. That works for simple projects. But what if you need to tune your model? You test different settings, pick the best one, and evaluate on the test set. The problem is that you have now indirectly used the test set to make decisions. It is no longer a fair judge. This is where a three way split becomes important. 🔹X_train, X_temp, y_train, y_temp = train_test_split( X, y, test_size=0.3, random_state=42 ) 🔹X_val, X_test, y_val, y_test = train_test_split( X_temp, y_temp, test_size=0.5, random_state=42 ) Now you have three sets. Training set. The model learns here. 70 percent of your data. Validation set. You tune and compare models here. 15 percent. Test set. You evaluate the final model here. Once. Never again. 15 percent. The test set is sacred. You look at it exactly one time at the very end. One more thing that most people miss. Always stratify your split when your target column is imbalanced. 🔹train_test_split(X, y, stratify=y, test_size=0.2) stratify=y makes sure both sets have the same proportion of each class. Without it you might end up with a training set that barely sees the minority class and a model that has no idea it exists. The split is not a formality. It is a decision that shapes every result that follows. Get it right before you touch anything else. ❓What split ratio do you use for your projects and why? #DataScience #MachineLearning #Python

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories