Prathamesh P. Sakhare’s Post

Excited to announce Typedrift v1.0.0! 🎉 A new kind of React data-fetching library that eliminates the most painful part of modern full-stack development: “type drift “ between your frontend components and backend queries. What’s New in v1.0.0 - Props = Query: Define your component’s data needs via TypeScript interfaces, everything else is derived automatically. - Zero boilerplate resolvers with ‘view()’, ‘batch.one()’, ‘batch.many()’ - First-class mutations using ‘action()’ with Zod validation, guards, and built-in redirects - Production-ready: middleware, caching, OpenTelemetry, rate limiting, audit logs - Full React 19 + RSC compatibility - No codegen, no separate query hooks, no manual data wiring Why Typedrift? Because the biggest source of bugs in React/Next.js apps isn’t bad code, it’s “out-of-sync types” between what your component expects and what the server actually returns. Typedrift makes the component prop shape the “single source of truth”. The server must conform. Type safety becomes structural. If you’re tired of maintaining query files, fighting stale types, or dealing with the boilerplate of TanStack Query + Zod + manual wiring… this one’s for you. Check it out: https://lnkd.in/e5HRgUgA Would love your feedback, stars, or contributions! #React #TypeScript #NextJS #FullStack #DeveloperTools

Coming in typedrift v1.1.0 Exactly one week ago, I shipped the first version of Typedrift because I got tired of the same old headaches in data fetching for React-driven frameworks. Data fetching has always felt broken. You define exactly what data a component needs in its props… then duplicate that logic in a separate query. Over time, they drift. You only discover the mismatch at runtime. Typedrift fixes that. Instead of writing queries, you define a typed view from your model. That view becomes the single source of truth for both fetching on the server and the props your component receives. No more duplication. No drift. What’s new in v1.1.0: - TanStack Adapter: seamless integration with TanStack Start - Next.js Adapter: first-class support for App Router and Server Components Clean, type-safe data fetching with zero boilerplate and zero codegen. If you’ve felt the pain of maintaining queries that drift away from your components (especially if you’ve used Relay, tRPC, or TanStack Query), I’d love your feedback. Check it out: - NPM: https://lnkd.in/drSZji_9 - GitHub: https://lnkd.in/e5HRgUgA What do you think — does this approach solve a real problem for you? #React #TypeScript #DataFetching #WebDev #NextJS #TanStack

𝗝𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗦𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗽𝘁 𝗘𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗽 𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗱 JS runs one thing at a time. This is single-threading. Long tasks freeze your screen. The event loop manages async code. It connects these parts: - Call stack: Where code runs. - Web APIs: Browser tools like timers. - Task queues: Where callbacks wait. The order is strict: - Call stack finishes first. - Microtasks run second. - Macrotasks run last. Example: 1. Start runs first. 2. setTimeout moves to the task queue. 3. Promise moves to the microtask queue. 4. End runs fourth. Result: Start, End, Promise, Timeout. A zero-millisecond timer does not run now. It waits for the stack to empty. It waits for microtasks to finish. This fixes weird bugs in your code. Source: https://lnkd.in/gjBYnFZB

Promise.all does not cancel the other promises on failure. You await four fetches. One rejects at one hundred milliseconds. The other three keep running for seconds. Nobody told them to stop. What actually happens: Promise.all behavior: rejects the returned promise on first rejection Underlying fetches: still open, still downloading, still resolving Your .then on the rejection: runs while three network calls finish in the background Per ECMAScript Promise.all ( iterable ), the aggregate promise settles on the first rejection, but the spec defines no cancellation primitive for promises. A promise is a value, not a handle to a running task, so there is nothing for the runtime to cancel. The fetches continue until their network layer completes. This silently breaks: → Dashboards that exhaust database connection pools after a partial failure → Payment flows that finish a charge after the UI shows an error → Mobile clients that burn bandwidth on responses nobody reads The fix: → Create one AbortController, pass its signal into every fetch, and call abort on rejection. Were you aware of this? 1️⃣ Yes / 2️⃣ No 👇 #JavaScript #PromiseAll #WebDev #SoftwareEngineering

Count the lines of React 18 code you write for every single form submission: const [isPending, setIsPending] = useState(false) const [error, setError] = useState(null) async function handleSubmit(e) {  e.preventDefault()  setIsPending(true)  try { await save() } catch(e) { setError(e.message) }  finally { setIsPending(false) } } Now count the React 19 version: const [state, formAction, isPending] = useActionState(saveAction, null) One line. Same behavior. Automatic pending state, error handling, and reset. That's what React 19 is: the same React, with the boilerplate removed. Here's everything that changed: ⚡ Actions + useActionState — async mutations without manual loading state 🌐 Server Actions — call server functions from client components. No custom API routes. Just 'use server'. 🪜 Server Components — render on server, ship zero JS. Default in Next.js 15. ❤️🔥 useOptimistic — instant UI updates before the server responds. Auto-rollback on failure. ⚙️ use() hook — unwrap promises and read context inside loops, conditions, early returns. 🏠 Native metadata — <title> and <meta> tags from any component. No react-helmet. ❌ No more forwardRef — ref is just a prop in React 19. forwardRef deprecated. 🔍 Better hydration errors — actual diffs instead of "tree will be regenerated". 🤖 React Compiler — automatic memoization at build time. No more useMemo busywork. I wrote the complete guide — every new API with real before/after examples, Server Actions deep dive, and the React 18 → 19 migration steps. Still on React 18? 👇 #React #JavaScript #Frontend #WebDev #ReactJS #100DaysOfBlogging

🚀 Day 17/30 – Custom Hooks (Deep Dive) Tired of repeating the same logic in multiple components? 🤔 Today I learned how to make React code reusable & clean ⚡ 👉 Custom Hooks Today I learned: ✅ Custom Hooks are reusable functions using React Hooks ✅ They help extract and reuse logic across components ✅ Must always start with "use" (naming convention) --- 💻 Problem: Same logic repeated in multiple components ❌ (e.g. fetching data, form handling) --- 💻 Solution: Create a custom hook ✅ --- 💻 Example: function useCounter() { const [count, setCount] = useState(0); const increment = () => setCount((prev) => prev + 1); const decrement = () => setCount((prev) => prev - 1); return { count, increment, decrement }; } function App() { const { count, increment, decrement } = useCounter(); return ( <> <h2>{count}</h2> <button onClick={increment}>+</button> <button onClick={decrement}>-</button> </> ); } --- 🔥 What actually happens: 1️⃣ Logic is written once inside custom hook 2️⃣ Any component can reuse it 3️⃣ Each component gets its own state --- 💡 Real Use Cases: - API fetching (useFetch) - Form handling (useForm) - Authentication logic - Debouncing input --- ⚡ Advanced Insight: Custom Hooks don’t share state ❌ 👉 They share logic, not data --- 🔥 Key Takeaway: Write logic once → reuse everywhere. Are you still repeating logic or using custom hooks? 👇 #React #CustomHooks #FrontendDevelopment #JavaScript #CleanCode

In 2026, the "React Hack" is simply Suspense + the use hook. ### 💻 The Code Shift: function UserProfile({ id }) {  const [user, setUser] = useState(null);  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);  useEffect(() => {   fetchUser(id).then(data => {    setUser(data);    setLoading(false);   });  }, [id]);  if (loading) return <Spinner />;  return <div>{user.name}</div>; } The 2026 "Clean" Way: // No state, no effect, no manual loading checks. function UserProfile({ userPromise }) {  const user = use(userPromise);   return <div>{user.name}</div>; } // Wrapped in a Parent <Suspense fallback={<Spinner />}>  <UserProfile userPromise={fetchUser(id)} /> </Suspense> Why this is a win: Readable Logic: The component only cares about the UI, not the lifecycle of the fetch. Streaming: The server starts sending HTML to the browser before the data is even finished loading. Less Bugs: No more "race conditions" where the wrong data shows up because an old fetch finished late. The best code is the code you don't have to write. Are you still a useEffect purist, or have you moved your data fetching to the server? Let's talk architecture below. 👇 #ReactJS #CleanCode #WebDevelopment #JavaScript #SoftwareEngineering #Frontend

𝐈𝐬 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 `𝐮𝐬𝐞𝐄𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭` 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐨𝐨 𝐨𝐟𝐭𝐞𝐧? 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐦𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐩. We've all been there: you put an object or array into your `useEffect`'s dependency array, thinking it's stable. But because JavaScript compares objects and arrays by reference, even if their content is identical, `useEffect` sees a new object on every render and re-runs your effect. This can lead to performance hits, stale data, or even infinite loops. 🚫 The Problem: ```javascript function MyComponent({ data }) { const options = { id: data.id, filter: 'active' }; useEffect(() => { // This runs every render if 'options' object is new fetchData(options); }, [options]); // 'options' is a new object reference each time // ... } ``` ✅ The Fix: Stabilize with `useMemo` If your object or array doesn't logically change across renders (or only changes based on specific primitives), wrap it in `useMemo`. This memoizes the object itself, ensuring its reference remains the same unless its dependencies actually change. ```javascript function MyComponent({ data }) { const stableOptions = useMemo(() => ({ id: data.id, filter: 'active' }), [data.id]); // Only re-create if data.id changes useEffect(() => { fetchData(stableOptions); }, [stableOptions]); // Now only re-runs if stableOptions' reference changes // ... } ``` This trick is a lifesaver for optimizing `useEffect` calls, especially when dealing with complex configurations or filtering logic passed down as props. It keeps your effects clean and your app performant. What's been your biggest `useEffect` headache, and how did you solve it? #React #FrontendDevelopment #JavaScript #Performance #WebDev

Who really owns your form data? In a standard HTML input, the DOM is the boss. It holds the value in its own internal memory, and you only "ask" for it when the user hits submit. But in React, we don't like hidden state. We want every piece of data to be explicit and predictable. This is where Controlled Components come in. In this pattern, the React state is the single source of truth. The input doesn't maintain its own value. Instead, you tell the input exactly what to display using the 'value' prop, and you update that value through an 'onChange' handler that modifies the state. The input is "controlled" because its behavior is entirely driven by the React component. Why go through this extra boilerplate? It gives you total coordination over the UI. Since the data lives in your state, you can perform instant field validation, disable the submit button based on specific criteria, or even format the user's input in real-time. There is no "syncing" issue between the DOM and your logic because they are never out of alignment. Of course, controlling every single character stroke in a massive form can feel like overkill. For simple, high-performance scenarios where you just need the data at the end, Uncontrolled Components using 'refs' might be faster. But for most applications, the predictability of a controlled flow far outweighs the cost of a few extra lines of code. It ensures that what the user sees is exactly what your application "knows". #ReactJS #SoftwareEngineering #WebDevelopment #FrontendArchitecture #CodingTips #Javascript

A small React JS best practice for optimizing: Try to avoid using array index as the key in a component list. Use a string id that represents the data in the list item. Why? Bcoz, when list order changes, React can track items properly only using stable keys. That helps to optimize rendering. When use index? Use index only as a last resort, when list items do not have stable ID. Check out Robin Pokorny’s article for an in-depth explanation: https://lnkd.in/gADMazk7 #ReactJSTip